Pos4CHD: A Positive-Free Mask-Guided Counterfactual Synthesis Framework for Fetal Congenital Heart Defect Analysis

cs.CV Wenjie Xuan, Yapeng Li, Hang Su, Chen Cheng, Juhua Liu, Sheng Zhao, Ziming Huang, Bo Du · Oct 22, 2026
Local to this browser
What it does
Fetal congenital heart defect diagnosis is severely bottlenecked by the scarcity of positive cases, especially for rare subtypes that can occur in fewer than 1 in 10,000 births. This paper proposes Pos4CHD, a framework that synthesizes...
Why it matters
This paper proposes Pos4CHD, a framework that synthesizes pseudo-positive echocardiography samples using only normal images and semantic masks, completely bypassing the need for real pathological training data. By combining clinically...
Main concern
Pos4CHD addresses a genuinely hard clinical problem-positive-free fetal CHD synthesis-and delivers a well-engineered pipeline comprising rule-based mask manipulation and the custom FE-Gen generator. Quantitative results on in-house...
Community signal
0
0 up · 0 down
Sign in to vote with arrows
AI Review AI reviewed
Plain-language introduction

Fetal congenital heart defect diagnosis is severely bottlenecked by the scarcity of positive cases, especially for rare subtypes that can occur in fewer than 1 in 10,000 births. This paper proposes Pos4CHD, a framework that synthesizes pseudo-positive echocardiography samples using only normal images and semantic masks, completely bypassing the need for real pathological training data. By combining clinically guided mask manipulation with a specialized generator called FE-Gen, the authors demonstrate that synthetically augmented models can approach or exceed real-data baselines on classification, detection, and segmentation tasks.

Critical review
Verdict
Bottom line

Pos4CHD addresses a genuinely hard clinical problem-positive-free fetal CHD synthesis-and delivers a well-engineered pipeline comprising rule-based mask manipulation and the custom FE-Gen generator. Quantitative results on in-house datasets show strong generation fidelity and downstream gains, including zero-shot classification ($93.25\%$ ACC on EbA) and segmentation ($+10.49\%$ DSC). Nevertheless, the approach hinges on manually designed transformation rules per subtype and very small real-positive validation sets, which temper the breadth of the claimed generalizability across the more than 27 CHD subtypes.

“Extensive experiments on in-house datasets, together with expert evaluations, demonstrate the visual fidelity (−12.97\-12.97 FID) and anatomical consistency (+3.96%+3.96\% DSC) of synthesized images. Further validations across diverse real-world CHD diagnosis tasks exhibit promising results and consistent increments, including zero-shot classification (achieving 93.25% ACC on EbA and 72.92% ACC on TAPVC), lesion detection (+6.95% mAP50 on VSD), and anatomy segmentation (+10.49% DSC on fetal heart) compared with baselines.”
paper · Abstract
“Given the wide range of CHD subtypes (≥27), although normal cases are accessible through clinical efforts, positive cases for rare CHDs are often out of reach owing to low incidence rates (<1/10,000) and privacy constraints.”
paper · Section I
What holds up

The clinical motivation is compelling and the technical contributions are well-targeted. FE-Gen introduces two specific, principled improvements for ultrasound adaptation—histogram regularization and learnable semantic queries—which tangibly improve over naive ControlNet adaptation. The downstream evaluation is unusually broad for a synthesis paper, spanning zero-shot rare-CHD classification, lesion detection, and anatomy segmentation, and the authors transparently report failure modes such as subtle VSD structural misses.

“We notice two limitations during implementation: (1) Histogram distribution drift: generated images tend to be low-contrast and blurry, with histogram distributions deviating from real ultrasound as shown in Fig. 6, which remains under-explored in previous literature; (2) Sub-optimal image-mask alignment: Recent studies [18] neglect quantitative measurement of spatial alignment between generated images and conditions, and conventional binary or RGB embeddings for spatial guidance may interfere with anatomy semantics and degrade spatial control precision. To address these issues, we propose FE-Gen, which is tailored for high-fidelity and spatially consistent fetal ultrasound synthesis with two key designs: 1) learnable semantic queries, and 2) histogram distribution regularization.”
paper · Section III-C2
“Most occur in pseudo-VSD samples, where the IVS remains visually continuous despite the defect specified by the counterfactual mask, attributed to: (1) the inherent stochasticity of diffusion sampling and (2) the difficulty of precise spatial control over subtle, localized structures.”
paper · Section IV-D6
Main concerns

Generalization claims are constrained by a reliance on expert-crafted, subtype-specific mask transformation rules ($R(\cdot, c, \psi_c)$) whose hyperparameters are not fully specified, and by very small validation cohorts: the zero-shot EbA and TAPVC classifiers are tested on only 42 and 40 positive cases respectively, and the VSD detection training set contains merely 28 real positives. Additionally, the in-house datasets are not publicly available, making independent reproduction difficult.

The user study-while showing a $46.4\%$ real-vs-synthetic discrimination rate-used only 20 images per category, which is underpowered for strong perceptual fidelity claims, and the failure cases in Fig. 14 confirm that subtle pathological structures are not yet reliably synthesized.

“we design morphological transformation rules R(·, c, ψc) based on clinical prior knowledge... where ψc denotes category-specific transformation hyperparameters.”
paper · Section III-B
“CLS-EbA-test84 and CLS-TAPVC-test80 consist of 42/40 normal and 42/40 positive cases from 5 and 7 patients separately... DET-VSD-908, with a training set (760 negative/ 28 positive) and a test set (60 negative/ 60 positive)”
paper · Section IV-A1
“For 20 real and 20 synthesized images of each type (Normal, VSD, EbA, and TAPVC), clinicians are asked to classify them as real or synthesized independently. The overall average accuracy is 46.4%, comparable to the 50% chance level, indicating it is hard to distinguish synthesized samples from real data, reflecting our high perceptual fidelity.”
paper · Section IV-B1
Evidence and comparison

The evidence supports FE-Gen's superiority over generic text-to-image baselines such as DreamBooth, SD-LoRA, T2I-Adapter, and standard ControlNet in fine-grained mask alignment and histogram fidelity. However, the paper fails to quantitatively compare against the most closely related fetal ultrasound synthesis methods it discusses-namely FetalFlex and FVEDM-in either generation quality or downstream task performance, weakening the claim of SOTA applicability. Moreover, the downstream baselines are trained without synthesized data rather than competing counterfactual synthesis pipelines, so the gains reflect data-augmentation utility rather than methodological dominance over alternative CHD synthesis frameworks.

“Although similar to FetalFlex [18] in motivation, we adopt a fine-grained mask-to-image paradigm for ultrasound synthesis to achieve precise spatial control, and we mitigate the histogram shift to improve fidelity. Besides, Pos4CHD targets the more challenging fetal CHD synthesis for downstream analysis, where fine-grained anatomical fidelity is critical for distinguishing heterogeneous subtypes with complex cardiac structures.”
paper · Section II-B
Reproducibility

Although the authors state that code and models are publicly available, the core datasets-WHU-4CH-8k, WHU-4CH-Seg517, and the CHD evaluation sets-are in-house and not publicly released, which blocks independent reproduction of the training and evaluation pipeline. The paper does report training hyperparameters such as learning rates, LoRA rank, and regularization weight ($\omega_h=0.1$), but the clinical mask-manipulation rules and filtering thresholds are described only at a high level, leaving critical implementation details underspecified.

“Codes and models are publicly available on GitHub.”
paper · Abstract
“Due to the lack of public fetal echocardiography data, we collect an in-house dataset of fetal heart ultrasound from the hospital, namely WHU-4CH-8k.”
paper · Section III-C1
“The regularization weight ωh is set to 0.1”
paper · Section IV-A3
Abstract

The scarcity of positive cases remains a major bottleneck in developing automated diagnostic systems for fetal Congenital Heart Defects~(CHDs), particularly for rare subtypes. Although normal cases are accessible with effort, positive cases are hard to collect due to low incidence rates and privacy concerns, causing severe class imbalance or absence of positive training samples. Existing works resort to synthesizing positives with conditional generative models, but they are task-specific and require positive training samples, hindering application for fetal CHDs. To this end, we propose a positive-free mask-guided counterfactual generation framework for fetal echocardiography, namely Pos4CHD, which enables realistic, high-quality synthesis of pseudo-positive samples from semantic masks, with only normal samples at hand. Technically, we first develop FE-Gen, a mask-guided generative model tailored for fetal heart ultrasound synthesis that mitigates histogram drift and enhances image-mask spatial alignment. Building on FE-Gen, Pos4CHD employs a mask-to-image generation paradigm for CHD synthesis. It first manipulates semantic masks to simulate fetal-heart structural anomalies and then renders anatomically consistent images. Extensive experiments on in-house datasets, together with expert evaluations, demonstrate the visual fidelity~($-12.97$ FID) and anatomical consistency~($+3.96\%$ DSC) of synthesized images. Further validations across diverse real-world CHD diagnosis tasks exhibit promising results and consistent increments, including zero-shot classification~(achieving $93.25\%$ ACC on EbA and $72.92\%$ ACC on TAPVC), lesion detection~($+6.95\%$ mAP50 on VSD), and anatomy segmentation~($+10.49\%$ DSC on fetal heart) compared with baselines. Codes and models are publicly available on \href{https://github.com/DREAMXFAR/Pos4CHD}{GitHub}.

Challenge the Review

Pick a starting point or write your own. Challenges run in the background, so you can keep reading while the AI investigates.

No challenges yet. Disagree with the review? Ask the AI to revisit a specific claim.