Scaling Multilingual Mixture-of-Experts: How Language Coverage Changes Capacity and Compute Allocation

cs.CL cs.LG Joel Dag, Nikit Srivastava, Hamada M. Zahera, Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo · Oct 14, 2026
Local to this browser
What it does
Multilingual models share capacity across languages, so adding languages can hurt performance on existing ones. Mixture-of-experts models expand this capacity with little additional per-token computation.
Why it matters
At matched number of active parameters and training tokens per language, 32 experts reduce the loss penalty of expanding from 12 to 200 languages by 83% compared with a dense model. Our law further shows that broader language coverage...
Review status
The review hit a snag and will retry automatically. The abstract is still available below.
Community signal
0
0 up · 0 down
Sign in to vote with arrows
AI Review Review failed

Review failed. It will be retried automatically.

Abstract

Multilingual models share capacity across languages, so adding languages can hurt performance on existing ones. Mixture-of-experts models expand this capacity with little additional per-token computation. Given this extra capacity, does adding experts reduce what each additional language costs? To answer this question, we propose a repetition-aware joint scaling law relating number of active parameters, training tokens per language, number of experts, and language coverage. Fitted on 26,300 per-language loss observations from 64 pretrained configurations, our law reduces prediction error on held-out configurations by 28% relative to the strongest evaluated baseline. At matched number of active parameters and training tokens per language, 32 experts reduce the loss penalty of expanding from 12 to 200 languages by 83% compared with a dense model. Our law further shows that broader language coverage favors more experts across a wider range of compute budgets, guiding capacity allocation as multilingual models scale.

Challenge the Review

Pick a starting point or write your own. Challenges run in the background, so you can keep reading while the AI investigates.

No challenges yet. Disagree with the review? Ask the AI to revisit a specific claim.