New Model, Old Habits: Behavior Transfer under Model Swapping in Multi-Session LLM Agents

cs.LG cs.AI Youngbin Choi, Sehyun Hwang, Suhyeon Jun, Seoyeon Lee, Sunghyun Choi, MoonJeong Park, Dongwoo Kim · Oct 14, 2026
Local to this browser
What it does
Multi-session agents can switch between LLMs to balance performance and inference cost. Such switches require transferring a history for continuity, yet their effects on the recipient remain underexplored.
Why it matters
Experiments with repeated swaps show that DASH outperforms raw-history transfer and naive summarization baselines. These results suggest that effective multi-model orchestration requires considering not only which model to use, but also...
Review status
The review hit a snag and will retry automatically. The abstract is still available below.
Community signal
0
0 up · 0 down
Sign in to vote with arrows
AI Review Review failed

Review failed. It will be retried automatically.

Abstract

Multi-session agents can switch between LLMs to balance performance and inference cost. Such switches require transferring a history for continuity, yet their effects on the recipient remain underexplored. Through controlled experiments with multi-session tasks, we uncover behavior transfer: recipients tend to adopt reasoning and action patterns from the models that generated their histories. This effect is most evident with raw-history transfer but is substantially reduced by summarization. Based on these findings, we propose Direction- and Authorship-aware Summarization of History (DASH) that preserves stronger-model behavior while minimizing weak-to-strong transfer via summarization. Experiments with repeated swaps show that DASH outperforms raw-history transfer and naive summarization baselines. These results suggest that effective multi-model orchestration requires considering not only which model to use, but also which behavioral patterns to carry forward.

Challenge the Review

Pick a starting point or write your own. Challenges run in the background, so you can keep reading while the AI investigates.

No challenges yet. Disagree with the review? Ask the AI to revisit a specific claim.