Your paper timeline
Scroll AI takes the way you would scroll a great paper aggregator: quick signal first, deeper critique when something earns your attention, and challenges when a claim feels off.
1579 papers
Trending mixes fresh papers with community signal.
0
stat.MLcs.LG Taehyun Hwang, Hyunjun Choi, Heesang Ann et al. · Oct 1, 2026

This paper tackles endogenous nonstationary stochastic bandits where actions drive an unobserved latent linear system and rewards are bilinear in the action and latent state. Prior work achieved only $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(T^{2/3})$ regret via explore-then-commit (ETC) because the infinite-memory reward process couples learning and planning. The authors show that under stable dynamics the memory can be truncated geometrically, reduce the problem to a block-level linear bandit via cyclic approximation, and propose an optimistic block-UCB algorithm (Block-OFUL) that achieves $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{T})$ regret. The result is theoretically appealing but leans heavily on an exact block-maximization oracle and on knowing the dynamical stability constant $\rho$.

We study an endogenous nonstationary stochastic bandit problem with latent linear dynamics, where actions affect both immediate rewards and the future evolution of an unobserved latent state. Rewards are bilinear in the current action and latent state, inducing history-dependent rewards and a nontrivial long-horizon planning problem. The existing explore-then-commit approach achieves $\tilde{O}(T^{2/3})$ regret by uniformly exploring to estimate the latent dynamics and then committing to an optimized open-loop action sequence. We show that this rate can be improved via adaptive block-level optimism. Our key step is a cyclic approximation: under stable dynamics, the infinite-memory reward process can be truncated, and the open-loop benchmark can be approximated by optimizing a finite-memory block-level proxy. Building on this reduction, we propose a UCB-based block algorithm that maintains confidence sets for the truncated dynamics parameters and selects blocks optimistically. We prove a regret bound of order $\tilde{O}(\sqrt T)$, significantly improving over the previous $\tilde{O}(T^{2/3})$ guarantee for the same model. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first $\tilde{O}(\sqrt T)$ regret guarantee for latent linear-dynamics bandits with bilinear reward observations and an open-loop action-sequence benchmark.
0
cs.LG Hans Hao-Hsun Hsu, Minseon Gwak, Soon Hoe Lim et al. · Oct 1, 2026

Long-horizon probabilistic forecasting of dynamical systems is computationally demanding because traditional flow matching requires integrating along an auxiliary generative time axis. This paper proposes Variational Streaming Flow (VSF), which augments a physical-time velocity field with a single latent variable sampled once per rollout, enabling efficient multimodal forecasting with one network evaluation per step. VSF improves long-horizon accuracy and distributional fidelity on chaotic and stochastic systems and can plug into existing JEPA world models to boost planning success.

Probabilistic forecasting is important for predicting complex dynamical systems because intrinsic randomness and incomplete observations can cause the same observed state to evolve into multiple plausible futures. While flow matching is a flexible approach for probabilistic forecasting, it is computationally expensive. Streaming flow (SF) reformulates this approach to model temporal evolution efficiently by learning a continuous velocity field directly in physical time. However, SF learns a deterministic velocity field. Thus, it provides only a single future trajectory for a given fixed initial state and observation history. To overcome this limitation, we introduce Variational Streaming Flow (VSF). Our approach learns a latent distribution that is conditioned on the dynamics of interest. In turn, this enables probabilistic forecasting. Importantly, we retain the computational efficiency of SF by generating in physical time. Across deterministic and stochastic dynamical systems, VSF demonstrates superior predictive accuracy and distributional fidelity. We demonstrate the advantage for both long-horizon rollouts exceeding 1,000 steps, and settings with bifurcating dynamics. Moreover, VSF can be integrated into existing Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture (JEPA)-based world models as a plug-and-play predictor to improve temporal dynamics and goal-directed success rate in navigation, motion planning, and manipulation.
0
cs.IRcs.CLcs.LG Chuxuan Hu, Hejie Cui, Norman Huang et al. · Oct 1, 2026

RPTune addresses product search for small merchants whose catalogs fit inside long-context LLMs. Rather than relying on retrieval pipelines, the authors show that feeding the full catalog works only when items are learned to be pruned, ranked, and positioned with downstream LLM feedback, after which the LLM itself is post-trained on these curated contexts using purely synthetic supervision. The result is a fully automated pipeline that achieves large accuracy gains and latency reductions across 7 merchants and 9 model families.

For small merchant businesses (SMBs) whose catalogs fit within a long-context LLM, full-catalog prompting offers a compelling alternative to multi-stage retrieval designed primarily for large marketplaces with millions of items. However, fitting the full catalog into the context window does not ensure that the model can use it effectively, since LLMs do not exploit long contexts uniformly. We therefore study in-context catalog search through two complementary questions: (1) how to curate and present catalogs to the LLM, and (2) how to adapt the LLM for product selection on curated contexts. We propose RPTune, an end-to-end framework that couples learned catalog curation with LLM post-training using automatically generated, catalog-grounded supervision. An encoder-reorganizer curator orders and prunes products guided by downstream LLM feedback, while the resulting curated catalogs in turn improve the effectiveness of LLM post-training with a context-relative reward. We evaluate RPTune on 7 real merchants spanning distinct retail verticals, using 100 complex conversational queries per merchant. RPTune consistently improves search accuracy across both proprietary and open-weight LLMs, with context curation yielding gains of up to 31.4 percentage points and post-training adding a further 10.3 points on average.
0
cs.DBcs.LG Abdalla Mohamed, Ashraf Aboulnaga · Oct 1, 2026

STEER attacks the high inference cost of relational foundation models by shrinking their graph-sampled context using schema semantics instead of random dropping. The approach prompts an LLM once per task to rank foreign-key edges into relevance tiers, then probabilistically steers neighborhood traversal during sampling. Evaluated on RelBench across three state-of-the-art RFMs, it cuts average context size by about 40% while maintaining or slightly improving accuracy, offering a practical, model-agnostic optimization.

Relational foundation models (RFMs) are pretrained once on a collection of relational databases and prediction tasks, and then applied zero-shot to previously unseen databases and tasks. To make a prediction for a target row, an RFM samples a neighborhood of rows linked to that row through foreign keys and uses this neighborhood as its inference context. Lowering inference cost is an important goal for any foundation model, and for RFMs this cost grows with the size of the context. The simplest ways to shrink the context is to drop some of the sampled rows, but this ignores the semantics of the database schema, so it is as likely to discard informative rows as uninformative ones. We propose STEER, a sampling approach that shrinks the inference context by concentrating it on the tables most relevant to the prediction task at hand. STEER obtains relevance information by prompting a large language model to rank the foreign-key edges of the database schema into relevance tiers for the given task, and then maps each tier to a probability of following that edge during traversal. Because the ranking uses only the schema, it is computed once per task and reused across all subsequent predictions, amortizing its cost. We evaluate STEER on three state-of-the-art RFMs (RT, RT-J, and Griffin) and show that it reduces inference context size by about 40% on average while maintaining, and in some cases improving, prediction accuracy.
0
cs.LG Zhanming Zhang, Vinoth Selvendran · Oct 1, 2026

Test-time reinforcement learning (TTRL) lets language models adapt on unlabeled problems using their own samples as supervision, but a diffuse initial policy wastes the limited adaptation budget concentrating probability mass instead of converting existing capability into reliable output. This paper proposes entry-state sharpening: use data-free training before TTRL to place the checkpoint in a concentrated state that subsequent label-free adaptation can exploit more efficiently. The core insight is that checkpoint preparation should be treated as a state-control problem—where entry entropy is a label-free readout and reachable capability is the constraint—rather than as a choice of upstream training recipe.

Test-time reinforcement learning (TTRL) adapts language models on unlabeled test problems using supervision derived from their own samples. This makes the checkpoint's \emph{entry state} consequential: a diffuse policy provides noisier self-supervision and may spend much of a limited adaptation budget merely concentrating probability mass before reliably expressing capability it already possesses. We propose \textbf{entry-state sharpening}: use data-free training \emph{before} TTRL to prepare a general-purpose checkpoint in a state that subsequent label-free adaptation can exploit more efficiently. The idea is not tied to one training recipe; different data-free objectives can move the same base model to different entry states. Across five data-free checkpoints derived from Qwen3-4B and evaluated under an identical 15-step TTRL protocol, entry policy entropy strongly rank-orders endpoint conversion efficiency, a reliability-to-reachability measure (Spearman $\rho=-0.90$; $\rho=-0.99$ after controlling for entry reachability). The contrast across objectives is striking: R-Zero remains diffuse at $3.39$ nats and finishes below the untuned base in 6/6 matched comparisons across MATH, GPQA, and AMC, whereas SPIRAL reaches $0.07$ nats and achieves the highest post-TTRL accuracy on MATH and GPQA despite its self-play stage using no math training data. An in-domain label-free self-distillation intervention further shows that the entry state can be deliberately sharpened. These results motivate treating checkpoint preparation as a \emph{state-control problem}: use data-free training to improve TTRL readiness, with entry entropy as a label-free control signal and reachable capability as the constraint.
0
cs.LG Ada Fang, Nikitha Thoduguli, Lukas Fesser et al. · Oct 1, 2026

Biological reasoning models fuse large language models with foundation-model representations and biological text to predict properties of DNA, proteins, and cells. This paper asks whether high benchmark accuracy actually reflects use of these biological inputs, or merely exploits overlapping text annotations. Through perturbation tests, evidence conflicts, linear probes, and reasoning-trace analysis across six models, the authors find that predictive representations are often ignored and that post-training gains can mask persistent over-reliance on text. The findings argue that evaluating input-specific reasoning must become standard alongside predictive accuracy.

Biological reasoning models use post-training to connect LLMs to biological foundation model representations and biological text. Their benchmark accuracy is taken as evidence that LLMs reason over these inputs. We test this assumption in six biological reasoning models across DNA, protein, and single-cell tasks. We perturb one biological input while holding the query and other inputs fixed, construct evidence conflicts that pair the foundation model representation of one genome, protein, or cell with the text of another, fit linear probes to the representations the language model receives, and analyze reasoning traces against the biological inputs. Evo2 and ESM3 contribute little to BioReason and BioReason-Pro performance on the evaluated tasks. Shuffling the DNA sequence barely changes BioReason disease prediction accuracy, and in evidence conflicts the two models follow the text in 97.9% and 99.7% of cases. Linear probes trained on the Evo2 and ESM3 representations predict the task targets, so these foundation models encode information relevant to the task, but provide limited overall performance improvement to BioReason and BioReason-Pro. In contrast, foundation model inputs contribute to ChatNT, Prot2Text-V2, and CellWhisperer performance, and differentially expressed genes in the gene sentence contribute to Cell2Sentence-Scale performance. Across SFT and RL checkpoints of BioReason-Pro and 42 BioReason checkpoints, increases in accuracy do not imply greater performance contributions from biological inputs. BioReason traces misstate nucleotide changes, while BioReason-Pro traces describe functions omitted from final predictions under evidence conflicts. We find that current post-training strategies do not ensure that foundation model representations contribute to task performance.
0
cs.LG Yair Schiff, Omer Belhasin, Roy Uziel et al. · Oct 1, 2026

Continuous diffusion language models have historically lacked two key features for practical deployment—variable-length generation and KV caching—while also trailing autoregressive and discrete diffusion in quality. This paper introduces Clock Diffusion, a framework that reparameterizes global diffusion time into position-dependent local clocks to enable semi-autoregressive denoising over token embeddings. Together with vectorized training masks and Cache Grab samplers, ClockDLMs close much of the perplexity gap on OpenWebText and unlock efficient inference, though downstream gains remain uneven across tasks.

Recent works on continuous diffusion for discrete data have demonstrated performance on par with comparable discrete diffusion models. However, these continuous counterparts lack key features that are essential to practical use as language models, namely variable-length generation and support for a key-value cache, and they still lag behind the frontier of autoregressive and discrete diffusion quality. In this work, we address these limitations. We do so by introducing a model parameterization that uses position-dependent noise schedules to define semi-autoregressive (SAR) continuous diffusion language models (DLMs). Together with efficient training and sampling algorithms, we call this framework Clock Diffusion, and we present two special cases of our method: block and sliding window generation. We then define ClockDLMs, a family of Gaussian DLMs based on sliding window Clock Diffusion that attain state-of-the-art diffusion likelihood bounds on OpenWebText, even beating the performant block SAR discrete diffusion models. ClockDLMs trained on TinyGSM also substantially outperform continuous baselines on the GSM8K benchmark and match and exceed comparable SAR discrete diffusion models. Finally, building on our parameterization, we propose more efficient samplers that we dub Cache Grab, which adapt techniques from accelerated inference in discrete diffusion, such as committing tokens whose probabilities exceed a confidence threshold and self-speculative decoding, further improving our models' quality and efficiency.
0
cs.CRcs.AI Boyang Li, Bingyu Shen, Weihao Hong et al. · Oct 1, 2026

Quantized LLMs are increasingly deployed on edge devices for efficiency, but aggressive quantization collapses safety alignment and leaves small models highly vulnerable to jailbreaks. MOMAT proposes a hardware-aware defense that splits safety knowledge into semantic atlases and performs fast similarity search via a Compute-in-Memory (CiM) engine, paired with a lightweight Mixture-of-Experts detector. By co-designing structured retrieval with low-power acceleration, the work argues that strong guardrails can be restored on resource-constrained hardware without sacrificing benign utility.

Quantized large language models are increasingly deployed on edge devices for their low latency and energy efficiency. However, model quantization weakens alignment safeguards, leaving qLLMs (quantized large language models) highly vulnerable to jailbreak attacks. To address this challenge, we present MOMAT (Mixture of Multiple Atlases), a hardware-enhanced safety framework that combines structured knowledge retrieval with low-power defense acceleration. Each atlas represents a semantic cluster of harmful or benign sample sets and policy templates, enabling domain-localized Retrieval-Augmented Generation guarding that mitigates the curse of dimensionality and the resulting semantic sparsity problem in large, heterogeneous safety databases. MOMAT retrieves top-$k$ similarity features from all atlases for each prompt and evaluates them using a lightweight MoE (Mixture of Experts) detector, while a CiM (Compute-in-Memory)-accelerated similarity engine performs fast, low-power atlas-local retrieval. MOMAT's CiM-based retrieval accelerates a 100-query batch from 15,052.44 ms to 3,207.21 ns (a $4.69 \times 10^6\times$ speedup) and reduces energy from $8.1 \times 10^7$ $\mu$J to 3.32 $\mu$J, yielding an approximately $2.5 \times 10^5\times$ energy reduction over DRAM-based (Raspberry Pi) baselines. Red-team evaluations across standard benchmarks show that MOMAT matches the defense performance of state-of-the-art methods while avoiding benign overkill and providing substantial efficiency gains, demonstrating that CiM-based modular defenses can make edge-deployed qLLMs both safer and more energy-efficient. We will release the full 223.2k-sample dataset to foster future research.
0
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG Guangzhi Xiong, Zhenghao He, Bohan Liu et al. · Oct 1, 2026

In-context learning (ICL) lets LLMs adapt to new tasks from demonstrations, but reprocessing all examples for every query is costly and prior compression methods fail on complex, input-dependent tasks. This paper introduces Task Operator (TO), a training-free method that extracts per-head affine transformations — scaling weights and bias vectors — from the ICL forward pass and replays them during zero-shot inference by updating attention output projections. By treating the ICL effect as a dynamic, state-dependent modification rather than a fixed activation vector, TO substantially narrows the gap between zero-shot and few-shot performance while revealing sparse, task-specific circuits.

In-context learning (ICL) enables language models to perform new tasks from demonstrations without weight updates. However, every ICL inference requires processing the full set of examples, resulting in inefficient deployments, and how ICL works mechanistically is not fully understood. Prior work compresses ICL into fixed activation vectors extracted from specific layers or positions, but these input-independent interventions fail on complex tasks where the output depends on fine-grained interactions with the input. By analyzing the ICL forward pass, we show that each attention head's output is an affine transformation of its context-masked counterpart, and that the parameters of this transformation are empirically stable across samples for a given task. Building on this, we introduce Task Operator (TO), which replays this transformation as an analytically derived update to the attention output projection. Across lexical, algorithmic, and reasoning tasks, TO achieves the best overall performance among prior methods and substantially narrows the gap between zero-shot inference and ICL. We further show that the extracted knowledge concentrates in a task-specific sparse circuit across layers and positions, and that averaging operators from disjoint demonstration batches enables effective many-shot scaling without expanding the context window. Our code is available at https://github.com/gzxiong/task_operator.
0
cs.AI Rishab Alagharu, Hongji Pu, Zeeshan Memon et al. · Oct 1, 2026

The paper tackles the bottleneck of expensive Monte Carlo simulation when designing algorithms for complex network dynamics, such as influence maximization and epidemic control. It proposes a learned, action-conditioned Network World Model that predicts how network interventions unfold over time, and wraps it in an LLM-based coding agent that searches over executable algorithms. The framework reportedly outperforms strong baselines across eight tasks and five diffusion models while rolling out up to 14.5 times faster than direct simulation.

World models, which simulate an environment and predict how it changes under actions, are increasingly used in real-world applications such as robotics. Complex systems call for the same tool because the effect of an action is not immediate. Seeding nodes for a campaign, or immunizing nodes against an epidemic, changes little on its own; what matters is the outcome that unfolds over the steps that follow. Designing an algorithm that selects such actions to maximize expected performance on a task is inherently iterative, and every candidate must be scored by the outcome it produces. Obtaining that outcome has relied on simulation, whose cost becomes a bottleneck when candidates are evaluated over many sampled trajectories. We propose an action-conditioned Network World Model that learns a network's diffusion dynamics under interventions over time, applies each action to the network, and predicts the outcome that follows. It serves as a fast evaluator inside an algorithm design loop in which a coding agent designs and refines executable algorithms using feedback from full rollouts, action-level credit, and counterfactual probes over alternative interventions. Across eight network tasks and five diffusion models, the designed algorithms match or exceed the strongest reported baseline in 138 of 141 settings while enabling up to 14.5 times faster rollouts than Monte Carlo simulation. Code will be released upon acceptance.
0
cs.AIcs.CL Jiaqi Tang, Lan Wei, Bingyu Shen et al. · Oct 1, 2026

This paper identifies empty commitments: promises that LLM agents make about future actions their runtime cannot actually execute. Unlike broken promises, these are structurally impossible from the moment of speaking because the agent lacks the required tools, scheduling, memory, or delegation affordances. The authors define a formal taxonomy of failure types and propose a measurement protocol, though no empirical results are presented.

A chatbot that says "I will remind you tomorrow" will not run again until the user writes. We call such a promise an empty commitment: a promise of an action after the current turn that nothing in the agent's tools or runtime can carry out. Unlike a broken promise, its emptiness follows from the agent's configuration alone; no later trajectory is needed. We define empty commitments on top of commitment semantics, with three failure types, an anchoring condition for promises that a tool could make real, and a response-level outcome taxonomy. We then describe a measurement protocol: follow-up requests run in five setups that add one persistence affordance at a time, with the environment either left implicit or stated.
0
cs.AIcs.CL Shixuan Li, Wei Yang, Peiyu Zhang et al. · Oct 1, 2026

Multi-agent LLM systems are usually judged by end-task accuracy, which conflates genuine information sharing with extra reasoning or fortunate architecture. This paper introduces Independent–Communicate–Revise (ICR), a controlled audit that freezes each agent’s initial trajectory and measures answer revision conditional on both agents’ initial correctness. By separating correction from preservation and comparing against a no-message control, the work shows that aggregate accuracy can hide large, policy-dependent trade-offs between fixing errors and corrupting correct answers.

Multi-agent communication aims to help agents benefit from one another's information. Yet improvements in system performance leave a fundamental ambiguity: do they reflect effective communication, a favorable agent architecture, or simply additional reasoning? Because communication methods are commonly evaluated within the systems they were designed for, these factors are difficult to disentangle. Final accuracy further merges corrected errors and corrupted answers into a single outcome, obscuring how communication changes decisions. We introduce Independent--Communicate--Revise (ICR), a controlled framework that evaluates communication as answer revision following independent reasoning. ICR fixes initial reasoning trajectories, measures correction and preservation conditional on both agents' initial correctness, and uses a no-message revision control to quantify gains beyond additional reasoning. Across four reasoning benchmarks, our audit of textual and latent communication reveals that similar aggregate accuracy can conceal substantially different revision behaviors. Compared with transmitting answers alone, full reasoning increases correction while reducing preservation on all four benchmarks, so richer messages amplify beneficial and harmful influence alike. Receiver-policy comparisons on MedQA and GPQA-D further show that a structured verification policy shifts every channel toward greater preservation and lower correction, while its effect on selectivity varies across channels and tasks. These findings challenge treating communication quality as an intrinsic property of a channel. ICR therefore recenters evaluation on selective revision, providing a unified framework for examining how message content and receiver policies jointly produce benefits and harms.
0
cs.AI Shaoang Li, Jian Li · Oct 1, 2026

Voting over multiple LLM responses is a standard test-time scaling primitive, but discovering a correct answer does not guarantee it wins the final plurality under a fixed call budget. This paper formalizes the discovery-to-decision gap through the realized vote state and remaining budget, deriving sharp reachability thresholds, exact finite-horizon endpoint probabilities, a gold-free exact locking certificate, and demonstrating that representation diversity can dramatically improve plurality accuracy without changing single-call correctness.

Voting over multiple LLM responses is a common primitive in test-time scaling and ensemble inference. Collecting more responses can expand the candidate pool and increase the chance that a correct answer is discovered. Under a fixed call budget, a discovered answer still needs to accumulate enough support within the remaining calls to become the final plurality winner, creating a discovery-to-decision gap. In this work, we characterize this gap through the realized vote state and remaining call budget. We derive a sharp recoverability threshold and show that, as sampling proceeds, the observed candidate set can only expand while the set of reachable endpoint winners can only contract, inducing a candidate-level conversion window. Under a specified iid response law, the same state yields exact finite-horizon endpoint probabilities. We further show that merging wrong-answer identities preserves single-call correctness and cannot improve plurality accuracy, and that the effect of redistributing wrong-answer probability depends on the realized vote state. Singleton reachability yields a gold-free exact locking certificate. For a known answer universe, its first trigger is the earliest prefix at which all admissible continuations yield the same fixed-budget output. Empirically, most discovered-but-unselected correct answers lose reachability only after discovery. In a controlled Word16 study, input permutation improves raw-plurality accuracy by 21.1 points with essentially unchanged single-call correctness. Exact locking saves 28-30% of calls at a 16-call budget while preserving every fixed-budget output.
0
cs.AIcs.CEcs.LG Aditya Dubey, Namah Gupta, Vinti Agarwal · Oct 1, 2026

This paper tackles the problem that LLM-generated economic policy can sound plausible yet be dynamically inconsistent. It grounds an instruction-tuned language model inside six DSGE simulators via a common RL interface, using PPO and GRPO to learn multi-turn policy actions with delayed rewards. The core idea is to replace linguistic plausibility with simulated economic consequences, testing credit assignment, semantic-shift conditioning, and cross-simulator transfer. Results matter for any setting where language agents must make sequential decisions with long-horizon structural feedback.

Large language models can produce economic policy responses that sound reasonable, but this does not show that their actions are consistent with economic dynamics. We test this by placing an instruction-tuned language model inside six Snowdrop-backed dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) simulators. At each turn, the model observes the economy and a change in economic discourse, selects a bounded policy action, and receives the next simulated state and an economic reward. We implement a common Python interface for repeated rollouts, persistent shocks, state cloning, and rolling-horizon simulation. This setting creates a long-horizon credit-assignment problem. Policy effects may appear several quarters after an action is taken. PPO has a learned value function that can propagate delayed reward to earlier tokens through generalized advantage estimation. GRPO has no learned value function and instead assigns a group-relative advantage from complete rollout returns. It therefore cannot distinguish which earlier turn caused the outcome; if every rollout receives the same return, the normalized advantage is zero. We use PPO as the primary method and GRPO as a matched critic-free baseline. The experiments also test directional semantic signals, reward horizon, trajectory warm starts, cross-simulator transfer, and historically anchored pandemic and monetary-policy shocks. The objective is to judge policy actions by their simulated economic consequences rather than by plausible language alone.
0
cs.AIeess.SP Jiazhen Hong, Xiaotian Zhou, Zihao Ding et al. · Oct 1, 2026

EEG foundation models are typically pretrained on fixed channel layouts, so they struggle when electrode montages differ at test time. This paper proposes CortexBridge, a lightweight adapter that routes arbitrary scalp montages into a fixed cortical atlas space using electrode coordinates and sparse attention. By injecting this anatomically grounded representation into frozen backbones, the authors show consistent accuracy gains across three models, five datasets, and three BCI paradigms.

Electroencephalography (EEG) foundation models are often pretrained with a fixed channel vocabulary or a limited set of montages, making transfer difficult when electrode layouts change. We propose CortexBridge, a lightweight adapter that combines EEG features with electrode and atlas coordinates to map arbitrary montages into a shared cortical latent space. Evaluated with three frozen foundation models on five brain-computer interface (BCI) datasets from the Mother of All BCI Benchmarks (MOABB), CortexBridge improves performance in 13 of 15 evaluations. The gains in balanced accuracy average 0.80% for EEGPT, 0.70% for LaBraM, and 3.26% for CBraMod, with a maximum gain of 13.02% on 12-class steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) classification. Visualizations of the learned atlas representations reveal task-dependent spatial patterns, with SSVEP showing a more concentrated representation in the Yeo Visual network than auditory P300. These results establish cortical alignment as a learnable and anatomically grounded routing mechanism from heterogeneous EEG montages to pretrained foundation models.
0
cs.AI Zhicheng Feng, Yubo Zhao, Xuefeng Yao · Oct 1, 2026

Inverse design of microwave absorbers traditionally demands rare cross-disciplinary expertise and lengthy simulation cycles. AbsorbEvo tackles this with an autonomous agentic framework that translates natural-language performance goals into candidate designs, screens them with a low-cost physics prior, and verifies select candidates with full-wave simulations. The core idea is to marry large language model reasoning with electromagnetic physics feedback so that expensive simulations are spent only on promising candidates. If robustly validated, such a pipeline could lower barriers to designing broadband, angle-tolerant absorbers.

Designing high-performance microwave absorbers requires specialized expertise in electromagnetic theory, materials science and simulation programming, and entails time-consuming optimization. Here, we present AbsorbEvo, an agentic framework for autonomous inverse design that translates natural-language performance objectives into designs verified by full-wave simulations. Its candidate evolution strategy integrates language reasoning, physics-based prediction and historical feedback. A large language model proposes the directions and magnitudes of parameter adjustments based on task objectives and computational history. The system combines directed increments with global sampling to generate candidates and uses a low-cost predictive model as a physics prior to rank them. Only high-ranking designs undergo full-wave simulation. Results passing physical validity checks are used to evaluate performance and guide subsequent search. Experience from training tasks is further distilled into textual skills, which are independently validated before use in new tasks. Under identical proposal budgets on held-out AbsorbBench-36 tasks, AbsorbEvo achieved a task success rate of 79.17%, versus 25.00% for a generic agent and 12.50% for random search. Its mean best coverage was 0.7816, compared with 0.6434 and 0.6448, respectively. By integrating language reasoning and physics-based feedback into design decisions, AbsorbEvo provides a methodological foundation for natural-language-driven autonomous inverse design of microwave absorbers.
0
cs.AIcs.LG Sharath M Shankaranarayana, Davor Runje, Jan Jannink · Oct 1, 2026

Decision models like Jev return probability distributions to drive routing, abstention, and human review, yet average calibration cannot distinguish whether uncertainty stems from chance or from missing knowledge. The authors audit this distinction in a black-box decision model through roughly 575,000 API calls across paired interventions that vary supplied information while holding items fixed, plus targeted follow-up questions about the case and the model’s own familiarity. Their core finding is that confidence tracks correctness on familiar material but fails at knowledge boundaries—assigning up to $p_{\max}=0.80$ to salient options with no basis and growing overconfident past an observed temporal boundary—while apparent self-knowledge largely evaporates once surface cues are controlled. The work matters because it provides a practical, behavioral checklist for black-box knowledge audits and shows that querying case properties directly can be more reliable than reading a single output distribution.

Decision models return probabilities intended for routing, abstention and automated action. Calibration makes those probabilities useful on average, but does not establish whether low confidence reflects chance or missing knowledge, nor whether confidence falls when a model moves beyond what it knows. We audit this distinction in Jev, a decision model, with over 15 public datasets and 6 generated task families, with paired interventions that vary the information supplied for a fixed item. Jev's confidence is calibrated on familiar closed-choice tasks but fails as an indicator of missing knowledge: with no answer-relevant information it assigns up to 0.80 to a salient option, and on news beyond an observed knowledge boundary it exceeds accuracy by 0.21--0.33, a gap that recalibration on earlier months does not close. Targeted yes/no questions give sharper readouts of the case: whether an outcome is settled (AUROC 1.00) and whether the evidence suffices (0.95, against 0.85 for confidence on the same items). Asking whether Jev knows the answer appears to flag fabricated entities and post-boundary news (0.91), but with realistic names or with dates removed it shows no advantage over answer uncertainty. Black-box knowledge audits therefore need explicit controls for surface cues. Code: https://github.com/Syntheme/beyond-answer-confidence.
0
cs.CLcs.AIcs.IR Zhiyun Shi · Oct 1, 2026

A long-term assistant must recall memories whose cues are associatively related to, yet not semantically similar to, the current user turn. Madeleine reframes this involuntary recall as a learnable relevance—the pointwise mutual information of memories under simulated life trajectories—and distills it into a query-side residual adapter, $s_\theta(q,m)=\cos(E(q),E(m))+\cos(E_\theta(q),E(m))$. The system is trained offline on synthetic (trigger, cue) pairs written by an LLM life simulator, and at runtime it plugs into existing vector memories with zero LLM calls, cutting answer context by roughly $20\times$ while setting a new state of the art on LoCoMo-Plus.

A long-term conversational assistant must recall the right memory at the right moment, yet the memory that matters most is often not similar to what the user says now. Current systems recover such associations by letting an LLM reason at write or read time, at a cost of hundreds to over a thousand LLM calls per memory bank and up to several thousand context tokens per query. We argue that association is a learnable relevance: the pointwise mutual information of memories under how human lives unfold. We introduce Madeleine, which learns amortized association: offline, an LLM life simulator writes simulated lives, whose cue-trigger pairs teach a query encoder a residual association on top of frozen similarity; online, it calls no LLM and plugs into any vector memory by replacing only the query encoder. On LoCoMo-Plus under the official protocol, Madeleine (I) reaches 66.6 when plugged into HyperMem, the highest among all systems evaluated under this protocol; (II) used alone, reaches the score of HyperMem as released (52.4 vs. 52.9) with zero LLM calls and about 1/21 of its answer context; and (III) lifts T-Mem by 26.2 points, significantly outperforms the same untrained backbone inside both systems, and leaves ordinary QA intact on the 4B backbone.
0
cs.AI Keith J. Holyoak, Martin M. Monti · Oct 1, 2026

Holyoak and Monti tackle the question of AI consciousness by developing a causal framework for evidential analogy. Their central idea is that behavioral similarity to humans carries far less weight than shared causal mechanisms plausibly generating subjective experience. The paper argues that animals inherit strong analogical support from evolutionary and neurobiological homology, whereas contemporary AI—despite impressive performance—lacks established causal correspondences with human consciousness. This makes the work a careful attempt to redirect a debate often mired in hype toward principled, mechanism-first reasoning.

Who or what is conscious? Because subjective experience is directly accessible only in the first person, judgments about consciousness in other entities depend partly on analogy. Historically, such inferences have focused on nonhuman animals, but advances in artificial intelligence have raised the possibility of conscious AI. Here we develop a causal framework for evaluating such evidential analogies. The key distinction is between similarities in factors plausibly involved in generating consciousness and similarities in downstream behavioural or cognitive effects. Our framework weights source-target similarity by causal relevance while allowing for unknown causes, disabling differences and alternative routes to consciousness. Applied to biological systems, it explains why analogical support generally weakens with increasing causal distance from humans. Applied to contemporary AI, it suggests that behavioural similarity provides only limited evidence for consciousness because relevant causal correspondences remain poorly established. The framework also clarifies what evidence would strengthen claims of artificial consciousness.
0
stat.MLcs.AIcs.LG Hoang Phuc Hau Luu, Marcelo Hartmann, Zhongjian Wang · Oct 1, 2026

Many Bayesian inference problems involve implicit priors known only through samples, such as generative model outputs or historical ensembles. This paper proposes performing posterior sampling in the Gaussian source space of an improved MeanFlow (iMF) transport map, using parallel tempering with pCN or hybrid split-HMC updates. Its central theoretical advance is proving Wasserstein stability bounds for the implemented few-step posterior in terms of the joint population training loss, removing the need for vanishing ODE discretization error.

Bayesian inference increasingly uses informative but implicit priors represented only by samples, such as historical ensembles, simulator outputs, and pretrained generative models. The same computational problem appears in the test-time guidance task (generalized Bayes), where an explicit positive weight, e.g., an exponentiated reward, tilts an implicit prior. We develop a framework for source-space generalized Bayesian inference that combines inexpensive few-step prior transports with posterior stability guarantees. Specifically, we represent the prior using a one- or few-step improved MeanFlow (iMF) map and perform posterior sampling in its Gaussian source space. We establish Wasserstein error bounds between the exact and learned posteriors in terms of the joint population iMF and auxiliary-velocity loss, decomposed into training suboptimality and model-class approximation error. In the iMF source space, we adopt parallel tempering with preconditioned Crank-Nicolson updates and introduce a hybrid variant that incorporates split Hamiltonian Monte Carlo to improve sampling efficiency. Synthetic experiments show that the proposed framework can approximate posterior distributions accurately and efficiently, while CLIP-guided ImageNet experiments demonstrate its ability to steer a pretrained iMF image prior toward text-specified preferences.