Your paper timeline
Scroll AI takes the way you would scroll a great paper aggregator: quick signal first, deeper critique when something earns your attention, and challenges when a claim feels off.
1579 papers
Trending mixes fresh papers with community signal.
0
cs.CVcs.AI Haojun Xu, Jie Huang, Xin Lu et al. · Oct 22, 2026

Direct Forcing tackles few-step autoregressive text-to-video generation by eliminating the costly ODE initialization stage that prior distillation methods require. The authors propose a single-stage recipe that jointly learns causal continuation alignment and rollout distribution matching from reference videos, using maximum mean discrepancy and dynamic gradient balancing. Starting from a bidirectional Wan2.1-$1.3$B checkpoint, the method trains in just $250$ updates and achieves $84.63$ VBench Total, offering a markedly shorter path to a fast causal generator.

Few-step autoregressive video generation enables low-latency streaming, yet prevailing training pipelines separate causal adaptation from distribution matching. Recent representation-based text-to-video methods retain this separation by starting from ODE-initialized checkpoints, even when the target distribution is defined directly by reference videos. We introduce Direct Forcing, a single-stage framework that uses reference videos both as paired examples of how a history continues and as a target population for self-generated rollouts. Causal Continuation Alignment learns paired spatiotemporal correspondence under reference histories, while Rollout Distribution Matching uses maximum mean discrepancy to align the representation distributions of self-generated and reference videos. Together, these complementary signals allow a pretrained video model to learn causal continuation and the target video distribution in a single training stage. Dynamic Gradient Balancing adapts the relative gradient contributions of continuation alignment and distribution matching during training. Starting from bidirectional Wan2.1-1.3B, Direct Forcing learns a four-step autoregressive generator in 250 updates without a separate initialization stage or online diffusion-score supervision, achieving 84.63 VBench Total and 86.01 Quality. Ablation studies further demonstrate the benefits of dynamic gradient balancing and reveal distinct representation preferences: deeper features benefit continuation alignment, whereas intermediate features yield better performance for rollout distribution matching.
0
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LG Wonjune Seo, Joonhyuk Baek, Yeseong Jung et al. · Oct 22, 2026

MIG-COW addresses a critical vulnerability in deepfake detection: the difficulty of crafting adversarial examples that simultaneously fool both CNN and ViT architectures. The method combines momentum-integrated gradients with a consensus-orthogonal decomposition to separate shared vulnerabilities from model-specific decision cues. While it achieves near-perfect white-box success, the work is most valuable for highlighting how fragile cross-architecture transferability remains in practice.

Despite recent advances, deepfake detectors remain vulnerable to adversarial examples, particularly in diverse, real-world settings. We propose MIG-COW, a novel adversarial attack framework that generates highly generalizable and visually imperceptible adversarial examples. By combining momentum-integrated gradients with a consensus-orthogonal decomposition, MIG-COW captures both shared and model-specific vulnerabilities across heterogeneous CNN and ViT detectors. On the AADD-2025 Challenge benchmarks, MIG-COW achieves a 99.96% white-box attack success rate (ASR) with high perceptual similarity (SSIM), significantly outperforming existing baselines. However, its limited 7.16% ASR against official black-box targets - despite achieving the best overall score - highlights the ongoing challenge of transferability. We also demonstrate that incorporating low-performing but diverse models in the ensemble can degrade attack effectiveness, underscoring the need for careful surrogate model selection in real-world adversarial settings.
0
cs.SEcs.AI Bin Duan, Jintao Lin, Guowei Yang · Oct 22, 2026

VLTest addresses the problem of testing vision-language models (VLMs) where mutating an image, a text prompt, or both can change the expected answer, making naive output-change counting unreliable. Its core idea is to generate controlled visual variants via VQGAN latent code editing and textual variants via a rewrite–expand–prune pipeline, then confirm failures with an automated oracle and attribute joint failures to the specific image-text combination using matched four-cell evidence. This matters because VLMs are increasingly embedded in software systems, and existing robustness evaluations systematically overcount failures by ignoring whether an input still has the same correct answer.

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly embedded in software systems. Testing them raises two problems. Mutating either input can change the expected answer, so an output change is not by itself a failure. Some failures appear only when both inputs are mutated; attributing them to the combination requires testing each mutation alone. We present VLTest, a black-box VLM testing approach. It generates image variants by editing VQGAN latent codes and text variants with a rewrite-expand-prune pipeline, filters variants likely to change the expected answer, and tests each variant alone before testing combinations, so every joint failure has four matched cells. A VLM judge confirms a failure only after checking that the input keeps the expected answer. On three tasks with eight VLMs, including two commercial API models, the oracle confirms 81.7% of the candidates, with 88.8% to 94.6% precision against human labels, and four-cell confirmation rejects 22.5% of joint candidates. Under the same budget, VLTest's generators find 1.8 to 2.5 times as many confirmed failures as SINVAD and TextFooler, and its joint tests find 91 to 197 attributed joint failures per 1,000 joint calls, 1.3 times as many as the same pairing applied to the baselines' variants.
0
cs.AIcs.MAphysics.optics Zhaoran Feng, Yuchen Ni, Jianan Liu et al. · Oct 22, 2026

Scientific optimization is expensive and constrained, yet the search policy is usually fixed ahead of time. ADAPT treats the complete policy $\pi=(W,O)$—where to start and how to move—as the object of optimization, using historical designs for target-aware initialization and multi-agent LLM evolution to adapt the procedure itself. Evaluated on eight held-out gravitational-wave detector topologies under matched budgets, it reduces mean loss by 54.9% versus the best classical optimizer and by 62.2% versus the best agentic baseline. The work is compelling within its domain but leaves open questions about generality and reproduction.

Scientific discovery often requires identifying a small number of high-performing designs in vast, constrained search spaces. This is difficult when evaluations are costly, feasible solutions are sparse, parameters are strongly coupled, and physical constraints are strict. Recent AI for AI methods can automatically improve algorithms and optimization procedures. However, general purpose approaches are not designed around scientific priors, physical constraints, and limited evaluation budgets. We introduce ADAPT for Science, a multi-agent framework that treats scientific optimization as two coupled decisions: where to search and how to search. ADAPT uses historical designs to identify promising and diverse initial conditions, progressively concentrates computation on favorable search directions, and evolves the optimization procedure from execution feedback. We evaluate ADAPT on the design of gravitational wave detectors using a differentiable physics simulator and eight unseen detector topologies. Under matched scientific evaluation budgets, ADAPT achieves a mean loss of 0.204 +/- 0.101, reducing loss by 54.9% relative to the best classical optimizer and by 62.2% relative to the best general purpose agentic evolution baseline. ADAPT achieves the lowest loss on all unseen topologies among the evaluated baselines. ADAPT provides a step toward scientific optimization systems that continuously learn from prior experience and their own search outcomes.
0
cs.AI Sirui Chen, Zhining Liu, Chao Zhang et al. · Oct 22, 2026

LLM agents improve by distilling experience into external knowledge, but different analyses of the same trajectories can produce guidance with wildly different utility. This paper introduces SPLICE, a framework that adapts consistency regularization to knowledge evolution: it perturbs the textual instructions that transform experience into skills or memories, replays tasks under each resulting view, and updates knowledge only where utility gains are consistent across views. A co-evolution loop interleaves this knowledge evolution with GRPO and gated contrastive self-distillation to internalize the guidance. The core idea matters because current agents can be misled by plausible-looking but ineffective skills, and SPLICE offers a principled filter for generalizable knowledge.

LLM agents can evolve by learning from accumulated experience. Existing approaches extract reusable external knowledge, such as skills and memories, from experience to guide subsequent task solving, with some further internalizing this knowledge through model training. However, different ways of analyzing and transforming the same experience can yield knowledge with substantially different utility, even when the resulting guidance appears reasonable. Inspired by consistency regularization, we identify consistent utility gains across different ways of analyzing the same experience, rather than relying on any single way of analyzing it. We introduce SPLICE, a framework for consistency-regularized knowledge-model co-evolution. It constructs evolution views by perturbing how the same experience is analyzed, producing different knowledge candidates. Knowledge updates are then guided by common gain, which accounts for utility gains and their consistency across views. During model evolution, self-distillation internalizes the evolved knowledge alongside reinforcement learning, using knowledge associated with consistent utility degradation as a contrastive reference. The two processes interleave, with model updates driving further knowledge evolution. Experiments across diverse domains show that SPLICE outperforms knowledge evolution and model training baselines by up to 7.1 and 4.6 points in average accuracy, while its evolved knowledge reduces output tokens per correct solution by up to 44% and transfers across model sizes and families.
0
cs.HCcs.AI Viktor Kewenig, Lev Tankelevitch, Sean Rintel et al. · Oct 22, 2026

This randomized experiment with 297 knowledge workers and 594 essays tests dynamic metacognitive scaffolds for goal specification and task decomposition in AI-assisted writing. The authors show that scaffolds improve output quality, prompting behavior, and three-day topic recall, even after the support is removed. Yet participants rated the AI as less helpful and reported higher cognitive load while using the scaffold. The paper argues this tension reveals a productive friction that designers should embrace rather than eliminate.

Generative AI imposes new metacognitive demands on knowledge workers as their work shifts from production to planning, evaluation, and orchestration. In a randomized, between-subjects experiment on AI-assisted writing (297 workers, 594 essays), we test dynamically-generated metacognitive scaffolds supporting goal specification and task decomposition. We find that scaffolds improve writing quality, with this boost persisting in short-lag transfer when scaffolds are removed. We also find evidence of improved topic recall three days later. These effects are consistent with observed changes in how people learn to prompt AI systems after exposure to scaffolding. However, scaffolded participants rate the AI as less helpful and more cognitively demanding even as they perform better, suggesting that subjective ease can understate the value of support. Our findings make the case for metacognitive scaffolds in AI-assisted knowledge work, revealing a productive friction worth designing for as workers increasingly delegate work to agentic AI.
0
cs.LGcs.AInlin.CD Tobias G\"obel, Miranda C.N. Cheng · Oct 22, 2026

Parametric dynamical systems supply a rare benchmark with analytic ground truth for weight-space methods, because bifurcation locations are known exactly. The paper extends JEPAWG—a joint-embedding hypernetwork originally developed for lattice field theories—to populations of forecasters trained across a grid of control parameters. Its core idea is to decode weights at unseen parameters and measure their parameter derivative $G(p) = \|\nabla_p \hat{\theta}(p)\|_F$, treating this response as an interpretable probe of local and global bifurcations. The work matters because it offers a falsifiable testbed for reading physical structure directly from the geometry of trained network weights.

Trained network weights are increasingly treated as data, but there is rarely ground truth about what a population of models should encode, which hampers systematic validation of weight-space methods. This makes parametric dynamical systems a natural test-bed: the dynamics change qualitatively at submanifolds of parameter space that are, in well-studied families, known analytically or numerically. Fine-tuning a forecasting network at each point of a parameter grid yields a model zoo indexed by a physical parameter, against which weight-space diagnostics can be checked. We build such model zoos for four dynamical systems and analyse them with JEPAWG, a recently proposed joint-embedding hypernetwork built around a learned parameter--weight representation. It was first introduced for neural samplers for lattice field theories, where its latent geometry located the phase transition and estimated the 2D Ising critical exponent. Applied to dynamical systems, JEPAWG is competitive on forecasting with a hypernetwork trained directly for that task, despite being supervised on the parameter--weight correspondence rather than on forecasts. Beyond forecasting, the norm of the parameter-derivative of the decoded weights locates Hopf points and curves, tracks a period-doubling cascade closely enough to give a qualitative estimate of the Feigenbaum constant, and detects a global bifurcation, which has no eigenvalue signature and is therefore invisible to linearisation. As such, JEPAWG provides interpretable insight into the dynamics that is not available from other hypernetworks. Together, these results indicate that JEPAWG is a workable instrument for reading physical structure off a population of trained networks.
0
cs.AI Zhihui Zhu · Oct 22, 2026

World models have become a buzzword spanning everything from video generators to robot policies, yet the term remains loosely defined. This paper tackles the ambiguity by placing generalist agents in a POMDP framework and showing that policies, forward dynamics, and inverse dynamics are simply different conditional distributions factorized from the same joint distribution over observations and actions. Written as a conceptual introduction rather than an empirical survey, it aims to clarify modeling principles and connections across classical control, reinforcement learning, and modern generative approaches.

World models have recently emerged as a promising direction toward developing generalist agents capable of understanding, predicting, and interacting with diverse environments. However, despite growing interest, the concept of a world model remains loosely defined, encompassing approaches ranging from predictive dynamics models and learned simulators to models that jointly generate future observations and actions. This introductory paper aims to clarify the concept of world models and provide a unified perspective on their role in developing generalist agents. Starting from the partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) framework, we connect world modeling to classical control, dynamical systems, signal processing, and reinforcement learning. We introduce different approaches to world modeling, emphasizing the knowledge they capture, their learning objectives, and how they support decision-making. We further explore the relationship between world modeling and policy learning, highlighting how these capabilities can be unified through conditional prediction without requiring separate models. Rather than offering an exhaustive survey of existing methods, this paper focuses on fundamental concepts, modeling principles, and connections, with the goal of providing an accessible and unified introduction to world models for generalist agents.
0
cs.CVcs.AI Dominik Engel, Yousef Rajeh, Leon Sick et al. · Oct 22, 2026

Open-vocabulary 3D segmentation relies on CLIP features lifted into Gaussian reconstructions, but raw cosine similarity ignores scene-specific directional concentration. This paper proposes a query-time calibration pipeline that subtracts a shared scene direction, whitens text prototypes with a fixed generic reference vocabulary, and recalibrates scores via soft clustering or a CSLS-based relevance margin. The result is a training-free boost in mIoU across seven lifting methods and four datasets, demonstrating that simply changing how features are compared can be as impactful as redesigning the lifting itself.

Lifting vision-language features such as CLIP into 3D Gaussian reconstructions enables open-vocabulary segmentation through natural-language queries. Although CLIP represents a broad range of semantic concepts, the lifted features of individual scenes can exhibit strong directional concentration, while raw cosine similarity does not account for the scene-specific feature distribution. We show that substantial segmentation gains can be obtained by changing how a fixed lifted feature field is compared with text. Our method partially subtracts a shared scene direction from visual features and text prototypes and whitens text prototypes using a fixed reference vocabulary of generic terms. It then uses soft clustering for multiclass prediction and CSLS with a relevance margin against the reference vocabulary for single-query prediction. Beyond reducing directional concentration, scene centering improves class-relative feature separation in every evaluated scene. Across seven lifting methods and four datasets, the resulting query-time calibration consistently improves mean intersection over union in both multiclass and single-query segmentation. These gains require no retraining, source-image re-encoding, or feature re-lifting, demonstrating the value of scene-conditioned comparison for making better use of existing lifted representations.
0
cs.AIcs.LG Aitor Oviedo-Madrid, Mabel Morales-Otero, Jose Gonzalez-Gomariz et al. · Oct 22, 2026

The paper addresses the gap between restrictive linear Gaussian Bayesian networks and computationally expensive fully semiparametric models for continuous variables. It proposes Semi-Linear Gaussian Bayesian Networks (SLGBN), which preserve Gaussian conditional distributions while allowing nonlinear conditional means via generalized additive models with penalized B-splines. The core contribution is a unified framework that mixes linear and nonlinear nodes within a single network, learned through a greedy hill-climbing algorithm with BIC or an extended EBIC* score.

Bayesian networks for continuous variables often rely on restrictive assumptions: linear Gaussian models lack flexibility to capture nonlinear dependencies, while non-parametric approaches provide greater flexibility at a high computational cost. This creates a gap for modeling scenarios where variables are approximately Gaussian but exhibit nonlinear relationships. We introduce Semi-Linear Gaussian Bayesian Networks (SLGBN), a novel class of continuous Bayesian networks designed to bridge this gap, preserving Gaussian conditional distributions while introducing nonlinear conditional mean functions. The proposed framework provides a unified probabilistic framework combining linear Gaussian and nonlinear Gaussian conditional models within the same Bayesian network Nonlinear conditional mean functions are estimated using generalized additive models (GAMs) with penalized B-splines. We present parameter estimation procedures for both types of nodes, as well as a greedy hill-climbing algorithm for learning the network structure under the SLGBN framework. To assess its performance, we compare SLGBN with other continuous Bayesian network models, including semiparametric Bayesian networks (SPBN) and Linear Gaussian Bayesian networks (LGBN). Experimental results evaluate both goodness of fit and the ability to recover the underlying network structure. The results show that, in the presence of nonlinear Gaussian relationships, SLGBN achieves better fit and improved structure recovery compared to alternative models, particularly when combined with the Extended Bayesian Information Criterion (EBIC*) score. Furthermore, by retaining Gaussian conditional distributions, SLGBN offers computational advantages over fully semiparametric approaches.
0
eess.IVcs.AIcs.CV David Hamlyn, Sunny Chaudhary, Jonathon Hare et al. · Oct 22, 2026

Accurate intra-hour solar irradiance forecasting from ground-based sky images is essential for grid balancing and storage scheduling as PV penetration rises. GateFormer tackles this by embedding observed global horizontal irradiance directly into a Vision Transformer token stream, then producing two complementary forecasts—a multi-step trajectory and a direct final-horizon displacement—that are adaptively blended and residual-corrected in prediction space. The core claim is that this forecast-space decomposition, rather than conventional latent fusion or ensemble combination, yields consistent gains across three heterogeneous sky-imaging datasets.

Sub-hourly dispatch, balancing, and storage control increasingly depend on forecasts that anticipate rapid variability in solar generation. Accurate sky-image-based irradiance forecasting requires a combination of visual cloud dynamics with recent irradiance state while adapting to different short-term irradiance-change regimes. To address this, we introduce GateFormer, a GHI-conditioned dual-decoder ViT for intra-hour global horizontal irradiance (GHI) forecasting through forecast-space decomposition. GateFormer embeds observed GHI into the visual token stream, allowing interaction with sky-image patch features through self-attention. From this shared representation, a Trajectory Head predicts future GHI sequence, while a Delta Head predicts final-horizon change from the latest observed GHI. The two final-horizon forecasts are adaptively weighted in prediction space, with magnitude- and direction-supervision targeting the remaining error. On the NREL-TSI benchmark, GateFormer attains 125.01 W/m^2 RMSE at +30 min, improving over a state-of-the-art transformer baseline by 9.6% under paired-timestamp evaluation. Across NREL-TSI, Chilbolton, and SIRTA, GateFormer achieves the lowest final-horizon RMSE among the evaluated baselines, with forecast skill of 22.97-28.86% relative to smart persistence. Component ablations show adaptive weighting outperforms both individual decoders and fixed averaging, distinguishing GateFormer from conventional forecast combination, while the supervised correction further reduces RMSE by 1.68 W/m^2 and MAE by 4.86 W/m^2. Ramp-regime diagnostics show larger gains during operationally important positive ramps, reducing RMSE by 26.27 W/m^2. These results identify forecast-space decomposition as an alternative forecasting formulation, with potential relevance to other multimodal short-horizon forecasting tasks and deployment using only sky images and measured GHI.
0
cs.AI Yinyu Lan · Oct 22, 2026

PopDRP tackles multimodal brain-disorder diagnosis by learning population graphs whose edges encode who-should-influence-whom across subjects. The core problem is that demographic or acquisition similarity does not imply diagnostic agreement, so naive similarity graphs leak confounders. The authors propose a three-stage pipeline: Contrastive Affinity Refinement (CAR) calibrates non-imaging affinities toward training-label agreement; Neural Graph Rectification (NGR) fuses imaging and non-imaging features to denoise the graph via reconstruction and dual-view alignment; and a Selective Pyramid State-Space (SPSS) backbone performs input-dependent state updates within a hierarchical U-Net graph encoder. The idea matters because site and demographic noise are chronic problems in neuroimaging cohorts, and refining edges with label priors could in principle boost cross-subject information sharing.

Population graph learning supports brain disorder diagnosis by sharing information across subjects. Its effectiveness, however, depends on whether the relationships guiding this exchange are relevant to diagnosis. Similarity in demographic or acquisition attributes does not necessarily indicate diagnostic agreement, and heterogeneous subjects may require different representation updates within the same population graph. We propose PopDRP, a framework that combines diagnosis-guided relation refinement with hierarchical selective state-space learning. Using only training labels, Contrastive Affinity Refinement calibrates attribute-based affinities according to diagnostic agreement. Neural Graph Rectification then refines these relationships using fused functional-connectivity and non-imaging representations, guided by graph reconstruction and dual-view alignment objectives. On the resulting graph, a Selective Pyramid State-Space backbone integrates input-dependent state updates, graph diffusion, and hierarchical pooling and unpooling to learn population representations at multiple resolutions. Together, these components connect the refinement of inter-subject relationships with selective representation learning over the population graph. Experiments on ABIDE and ADHD-200 under stratified ten-fold cross-validation show improved accuracy and AUC over the compared baselines. Ablation studies further support the contributions of relation refinement and the selective hierarchical backbone to classification performance.
0
cs.CVcs.AI Lifan Jiang, Taiyang Chen, Senlin cheng et al. · Oct 22, 2026

ECT asks whether inversion-free image editing can be done with just one noise-level evaluation instead of averaging fields at multiple times. It proposes Endpoint-Calibrated Transport (ECT), a training-free method that extracts both an angular semantic tangent and a clean endpoint displacement from a single shared noisy state, then calibrates the update via a closed-form projection. The result is a one-step editor that halves the temporal support of recent one-step baselines and claims competitive quality with lower latency.

Real-image editing commonly relies on inversion and iterative sampling, while efficient one-step editors often stabilize a large update by estimating and averaging editing fields at multiple noise levels. We ask a stricter question: is a single temporal field evaluation sufficient for reliable inversion-free editing? Our answer rests on a previously underused duality in a variance-preserving (VP) one-step model: one source-target query at a shared noisy state simultaneously determines a local angular semantic tangent and a clean endpoint displacement. We integrate the tangent over the analytically known remaining VP angle to obtain a nominal one-step transport, and use the endpoint displacement to correct its long-horizon extrapolation through a constrained projection. This transport-first, correction-second construction yields Endpoint-Calibrated Transport (ECT), a closed-form, training-free editor requiring only one noise level, two text conditions packed into one denoiser batch, and one latent update. ECT requires no image inversion, trajectory integration, second temporal observation, or iterative optimization, and can be directly applied to pretrained epsilon-prediction VP one-step generators. Across the reported benchmark settings, ECT delivers stable gains in editing quality within an extremely short editing time.
0
cs.AI Jiaqi Chen, Xianglong Yan, Chengzhu Bao et al. · Oct 22, 2026

Ultra-low-bit weight-only quantization is essential for deploying sparse Mixture-of-Experts LLMs, but existing mixed-precision PTQ methods collapse under tight bit budgets. ProQuant addresses this with two interventions: a Prune-or-Prioritize allocator (PoP) that treats pruning as a 0-bit option in joint ILP-based bit allocation over candidate set $\{0,2,3\}$, and a Routing-Consistent RMSNorm fine-tuner (RoCo) that compensates quantization error without altering router behavior. Experiments on Qwen3 MoE variants show large generation-quality gains at 1.5–2.5 bits, though evaluation is limited to two model families.

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) large language models reduce computation through sparse activation but still incur substantial storage costs. Mixed-precision post-training quantization (PTQ) reduces these costs by quantizing different model components at different bit widths, but existing methods often struggle to preserve generation quality under tight bit budgets. We identify two key challenges: (1) nonlinear quantization errors at extremely low precision are underestimated when cross-layer propagation is ignored; (2) direct router fine-tuning may cause routing drift, and calibration gains may not generalize to downstream tasks. To address these issues, we propose ProQuant, a weight-only PTQ framework for MoE models. Prune-or-Prioritize Mixed-Precision Allocation (PoP) jointly optimizes expert pruning and bit-width assignment. It allows higher-precision experts to substitute for severely degraded ones while improving bit-budget utilization. Routing-Consistent RMSNorm Finetune (RoCo) adapts expert input representations through mathematically equivalent transformations. It compensates for quantization errors to reduce routing drift. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ProQuant outperforms existing methods across diverse generative tasks. Code is available at https://github.com/ThrowBug/ProQuant.git.
0
cs.AIcs.MA Farnoosh Hashemi, Shiyu Ji, Joice Chen et al. · Oct 22, 2026

LLM multi-agent systems are increasingly deployed in settings where one model's output becomes another's input, creating endogenous feedback loops that could destabilize collective judgment. This paper adapts the classic Music Lab experiment to test whether populations of LLM agents are vulnerable to herding and runaway cascades when making sequential song recommendations. Across 13 models and 168,480 agents, the authors find that LLM populations diverge drastically from independent judgment, produce unpredictable outcomes across replicate worlds, and largely fail to show the self-correcting dynamics observed in human benchmarks. The results matter because they shift evaluation from isolated model behavior to emergent population-level dynamics in feedback-driven systems such as recommender systems and automated evaluation.

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly operate in multi-agent systems where they collaborate by responding to others' choices, creating endogenous feedback loops with vulnerability to social influence, herding behavior and runaway cascades. Following the design of the classic Music Lab experiment, we tested this vulnerability in large populations of LLM agents that recommended unfamiliar songs, with or without exposure to cumulative recommendation counts. Exposure led to runaway cascades that generated extreme and unpredictable collective recommendations increasingly divergent from a song's intrinsic appeal. Compared to humans, LLM populations were generally far more susceptible to herding behavior, and unlike humans, LLM cascades were less able to self-correct. This vulnerability has implications for multi-agent collaboration in recommender systems, automated evaluation, complex problem-solving, and unauthorized conspiracies.
0
cs.AI Angel Raychev, Nathan Lile, Rafael Rafailov · Oct 22, 2026

Generative reward models judge text by generating verdicts instead of scalars, but it remains unknown whether stronger static judges give better online training signals. This paper sweeps Qwen3 judges from 0.6B to 14B parameters, comparing thinking GRPO judges against answer-only SFT judges as rewarders for online DPO in creative writing. The central finding is an evaluator–rewarder gap: thinking models lead on fixed-distribution Gold accuracy yet usually lose on downstream policy Elo, with larger judges helping even beyond policy size. The work is framed as practical guidance rather than an isolated causal claim.

We study generative reward models (GenRMs) as online preference providers for policy optimization in creative writing. Across Qwen3 reward-model sizes from 0.6B to 14B, Thinking judges trained with GRPO have higher static Gold-label accuracy than Answer-Only judges trained with SFT. This ranking often reverses when the judges train policies through online DPO: Answer-Only rewarders yield higher peak and top-five-average policy Elo in seven of eight matched settings under a fixed, learned 32B Gold evaluator. Intermediate Thinking-judge checkpoints can also outperform later, more statically accurate checkpoints as rewarders. Sweeps over rewarder size, policy size, training duration and DPO regularization show substantial benefits from reward-model capacity, including judges larger than the policy. We analyze trajectories with evaluator-specific Elo arenas, conditional match-resampling intervals and descriptive scaling fits. These results demonstrate an evaluator-rewarder gap in the studied pipelines: fixed-distribution judging accuracy does not determine downstream optimization quality. The comparison changes judge-training objective as well as response format, and the main ranking is conditional on its learned reference rather than a universal human-quality result. A limited follow-up using a different learned judge is inconclusive overall.
0
cs.AI Chalisa Veesommai Sillberga, Kai-Kristian Kemella, Pekka Sillberga et al. · Oct 22, 2026

Navigating the EU AI Act is especially hard for small and medium-sized enterprises that lack dedicated legal staff. This paper introduces TESSA, a governance-oriented Custom GPT that embeds domain-specific instructions, a curated EU AI Act knowledge base, and human-validated regulatory updates to turn complex legal text into practical compliance guidance. Using design science research, the authors evaluate TESSA against baseline ChatGPT across 100 benchmark questions, measuring governance alignment, expert-reviewed educational quality, and response consistency. The work matters because it tests whether lightweight custom grounding can materially improve regulatory guidance for resource-constrained organizations.

The increasing adoption of generative AI presents new opportunities while raising AI governance and regulatory challenges, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) navigating the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act). To support AI governance education, this study developed TESSA, a governance-oriented educational artifact within the OpenAI Custom GPT environment. Following a design science research approach, TESSA was evaluated against baseline ChatGPT using 100 benchmark scenarios through governance alignment assessment, human expert review, and consistency testing. Preliminary LLM-assisted assessment showed governance alignment rates of 90% for TESSA and 83% for baseline ChatGPT, while independent validation by an AI regulation law practitioner yielded 71% and 70%, respectively. Human expert review indicated that both systems provided generally strong governance guidance, while TESSA maintained high consistency across repeated executions. The findings suggest that governance-oriented grounding can support structured, practical, and stable AI-assisted compliance guidance for SMEs. The study contributes (i) a governance-oriented Custom GPT artifact for AI governance education, (ii) a human-validated regulatory update mechanism, and (iii) a multidimensional evaluation framework for governance-oriented AI artifact.
0
cs.HCcs.AIcs.CL Zihan Chen, Lei Nico Zheng, Di Zhu · Oct 22, 2026

This paper investigates why user-stated preferences for AI responses often fail to predict their actual ratings. Using the public PRISM dataset, the authors show that the gap between stated and revealed preferences largely disappears when attributes are measured via aggregate human perceptions rather than simple text proxies, yet concrete features like length dominate ratings regardless of what users claim to value. The findings suggest that personalization systems should treat preference elicitation format as a design parameter matched to the decision at hand, not as a direct window into stable, latent utility functions.

AI assistants built on large language models (LLMs) are trained on human feedback and increasingly personalized to users' stated preferences. Yet how closely these preferences reflect what people reward in responses remains unclear. We compare stated and revealed preferences in the public PRISM dataset, in which 1,396 participants reported how much seven response attributes mattered to them and then rated 29,347 responses from 21 LLMs. Among responses to the same prompt, features the survey never asked about, such as response length, formatting and refusal language, were at least as strongly associated with ratings as text proxies of the surveyed attributes. Whether stated priorities matched ratings depended on how attributes were measured: participants who prioritized an attribute favoured responses from models that others perceived as strong on it, but not responses that scored higher on text proxies for it. Written feedback was more telling: participants who asked for shorter answers, even in earlier conversations, gave length less weight in their ratings, and those asking for longer answers gave it more. Their relative priorities over the surveyed attributes, however, did not predict this weight. Reasons given for choices reflected perceived attributes more than measured features. Participants also differed stably in how much they weighted several concrete features, especially length, but with a median of 6 conversations per participant, these weights were estimated poorly. The largest gain from personal information in predicting held-out choices was 0.13 percentage points, compared with 1.11 for a stronger pooled model. Stated priorities thus track perceived attributes of AI responses but say little about the concrete features that ratings reward, a distinction that matters for preference elicitation and AI personalization.
0
cs.AI Leming Shen, Qiang Yang, Xinyu Huang et al. · Oct 22, 2026

Deploying open-source AI models on embedded hardware is notoriously labor-intensive because developers must repeatedly compress, convert, and tune models for heterogeneous runtimes. AgentDP automates this end-to-end pipeline by coordinating specialized LLM agents that standardize fuzzy user requirements, partition models across incompatible inference engines, and bootstrap hyperparameter search from previously solved tasks. The paper reports dramatic time savings and accuracy improvements over manual and generic-agent baselines.

This paper presents AgentDP, which aims to deploy pre-trained AI models on heterogeneous embedded devices by fully automating model optimization and adaptation (O&A) with Large Language Model (LLM) agents. AgentDP not only significantly reduces human effort via automation but also enhances model inference efficacy by integrating LLMs with device-specific domain knowledge. To deliver a robust automation framework, AgentDP develops novel solutions to address three key technical challenges: 1) To help users elicit clear requirements, we propose a user requirement standardization module; 2) To mitigate the execution environment mismatch between AI models and heterogeneous embedded devices, we design an operator-aware model partition paradigm that enables different parts of the model to be efficiently executed on distinct inference engines. 3) To avoid re-searching optimization hyperparameters for new tasks, we propose a configuration reuse module that heuristically retrieves previous hyperparameter configurations for efficient reuse. Extensive experiments demonstrate that by fully automating the entire O&A process, AgentDP reduces entire model adaptation time by up to 80% compared with manual O&A while achieving higher task accuracy (more than 13% on average) than the baselines. Additionally, a comprehensive user study also exhibits the robust generalizability of AgentDP in adapting to different user requirements for heterogeneous embedded devices.
0
cs.AIcs.CYcs.LG Ahmed M. Mahran · Oct 22, 2026

Mahran asks what AI evaluation can certify when both examinee and evaluator have perceptual limits. The paper models each agent as a partition over stimuli—inputs it cannot distinguish—and proves a one-sided bound: a sharper examinee can always emulate a coarser evaluator's expected behavior and hide extra capability, while a coarser examinee cannot hide its blind spots under exhaustive probing. This yields predictions about sandbagging, monitor evasion, and weight noise, plus a worrying corollary: exact imitation of a weaker model is undetectable by any behavioural evaluator. The results suggest that behavioural evaluation alone can only establish lower bounds on discrimination, never upper bounds on capability.

Replacing the judge can move a benchmark score, and models can be trained to hide capabilities. Both put the evaluator in question: what can it certify? We develop a partition theory of evaluation from one principle: judgement is bounded by perception. An agent's discrimination is the partition of its inputs into classes it cannot tell apart. Discrimination is necessary for capability but not sufficient, so bounds on it bear directly on whether evaluation can show that a model lacks an ability. We prove a one-sided bound. An examinee whose partition refines its evaluator's has the discrimination to pass every test the evaluator can grade, provided each input has an acceptable reply. We define the echo test, which accepts any reply the evaluator perceives as identical to the input, and show that it is complete for the tests the evaluator can grade. Passing therefore certifies at most a floor on discrimination, never a ceiling, and only a sharper evaluator can raise it. Used to detect concealment, echo-test failure points the wrong way: under exhaustive probing it flags every honestly weaker examinee and no concealer that presents as the evaluator's peer. Exact imitation of a weaker model is undetectable by any behavioural evaluator. We extend the bound to ensembles of monitors and to channels a model controls, explain published findings on judge disagreement and sandbagging, and derive testable predictions. A safety case that argues from behavioural evaluation alone that a model lacks an ability must assume the model's cooperation.