Your paper timeline
Scroll AI takes the way you would scroll a great paper aggregator: quick signal first, deeper critique when something earns your attention, and challenges when a claim feels off.
2 papers in q-fin.TR
Trending mixes fresh papers with community signal.
0
cs.GTcs.LGq-fin.TR Matteo Onger, Luigi Foscari · Oct 22, 2026

Onger and Foscari analyze competitive market making as a two-sided pricing game where strategic liquidity providers face a non-strategic informed trader with inelastic demand. Because bid and ask quotes jointly set the market mid-price that determines trade direction, standard equilibrium existence theorems fail and payoffs are non-convex and discontinuous. The authors prove that pure-strategy Nash equilibria exist via a novel fixed-point argument on a midpoint operator, derive a structural linear scaling of spreads with asset volatility, and show that no-internal-regret learning on fine price grids recovers the competitive benchmark as tick size vanishes.

We propose a market-making game played among $N \ge 2$ strategic market makers and a single non-strategic representative trader. In a continuous quote space, standard finite-game arguments do not apply, while non-convex and discontinuous payoffs rule out classical continuous existence results and complicate learning. Nonetheless, we characterize pure-strategy Nash equilibria (PSNEs) and show that at least one PSNE always exists under minimal assumptions on the underlying asset value distribution, and that the equilibrium bid-ask spread widens strictly with asset value volatility. To obtain a tractable learning framework, we discretize prices and, under an additional regularity condition, show that the time-averaged play of no-internal-regret learners approaches the continuous Nash price envelope as the tick size vanishes. Finally, we empirically validate our theoretical results through numerical simulations.
0
q-fin.TRcs.LGq-fin.CP Hongyang Yang, Boyu Zhang, Yang She et al. · Mar 22, 2026

FinRL-X tackles the engineering gap between quantitative trading research and live deployment by introducing a weight-centric modular architecture that unifies data ingestion, strategy composition (selection–allocation–timing–risk), backtesting, and broker execution within a single protocol. The core insight is treating portfolio weights $w_t \in \mathbb{R}^n$ as the sole interface contract, enabling composable strategies without recoding execution logic.

We present FinRL-X, a modular and deployment-consistent trading architecture that unifies data processing, strategy construction, backtesting, and broker execution under a weight-centric interface. While existing open-source platforms are often backtesting- or model-centric, they rarely provide system-level consistency between research evaluation and live deployment. FinRL-X addresses this gap through a composable strategy pipeline that integrates stock selection, portfolio allocation, timing, and portfolio-level risk overlays within a unified protocol. The framework supports both rule-based and AI-driven components, including reinforcement learning allocators and LLM-based sentiment signals, without altering downstream execution semantics. FinRL-X provides an extensible foundation for reproducible, end-to-end quantitative trading research and deployment. The official FinRL-X implementation is available at https://github.com/AI4Finance-Foundation/FinRL-Trading.