Your paper timeline
Scroll AI takes the way you would scroll a great paper aggregator: quick signal first, deeper critique when something earns your attention, and challenges when a claim feels off.
5 papers in q-bio.QM
Trending mixes fresh papers with community signal.
0
cs.LGq-bio.QM Sam Gijsen, Moritz Seiler, Kerstin Ritter · Oct 14, 2026

Conditional generative models are increasingly used to predict biological and scientific responses under unseen experimental conditions. This paper investigates whether flow-matching models accurately recover non-additive interactions between factors or instead hallucinate them when extrapolating beyond the training support. The authors propose decomposing interaction errors into recovery and hallucinated components and find that aggregate fidelity metrics often conceal failures to learn interactions, while successful extrapolation depends critically on whether condition structure continues smoothly from observed to held-out regions.

Conditional generative models are increasingly used for scientific prediction beyond the direct training support. Yet scientific questions often concern whether one intervention changes the effect of another. Such interactions can be of primary interest while explaining little of the total variation, allowing models to appear accurate overall without recovering the relevant scientific effect. It remains unclear how these models learn interactions and when these successfully extrapolate to unseen conditions. We therefore study interaction recovery in flow-matching models using a physiological time-series simulator, drug dose-response data, combinatorial cell perturbations, and molecular conformer generations, where we separate recovery from hallucinated interaction structure. In the controlled setting, individual effects are learned much earlier than interactions and models hallucinate interactions where none exist. Across settings, we find qualitatively different generalization problems, with successful prediction depending on whether condition structure continues from observed to held-out targets. When it does, interactions are recoverable. If not, models can generate plausible responses while missing the interaction. We furthermore find that hallucinations increase as targets become less identifiable, and that successful interaction recovery in output space can fail under nonlinear readouts. Finally, we show that aggregate fidelity metrics can conceal whether models learn and extrapolate interactions.
0
cs.LGcs.AIq-bio.QM Alberto Mart\'inez, Natalia Flechas Manrique, Lloren\c{c} Espinosa-Portal\'es et al. · Oct 14, 2026

ProtModernBERT tackles the high cost of training protein language models by porting modern NLP encoder improvements—RoPE, FlashAttention, GeGLU, and bias-free layers—into a BERT-style protein model. The authors pre-train on the UR100P corpus and show that a 140M-parameter model can match ProtBert and Amplify-120M on structural benchmarks while using roughly one-tenth the pre-training FLOPs of ProtBert. The work matters because it tests whether architectural modernization alone can lower the barrier to custom protein LMs for resource-constrained labs, and it uses random-initialization baselines to separate inductive biases from transfer-learned features.

Large protein language models provide a powerful framework for learning sequence-function relationships and guiding experimental design. However, architectural improvements are underexplored, especially in low-compute regimes of relevance for resource-constrained research laboratories. We show that the training cost for encoder-only transformer architectures can be reduced by leveraging modern architectural refinements, offering an encouraging performance / compute-efficiency trade-off. We introduce ProtModernBERT, a modernized BERT-style model pre-trained on amino acid sequences, and compare it with ProtBert, Amplify, and ESM2 across a set of supervised structural tasks -encompassing secondary structure prediction, disorder prediction, and subcellular localization- and ProteinGym's zero-shot functional benchmark. We find that ProtModernBERT matches or closely tracks the performance of Amplify-120M and ProtBert with up to 80-90\% reduction in pre-training FLOPs, and narrows the gap to ESM2 when controlling for pre-training. Our analysis using a cluster-based validation protocol for hyperparameter selection and randomly initialized models disentangles the contributions of architecture and data, showing that modern components provide stronger inductive biases that are more consequential than parameter count in low-compute regimes.
0
cs.AIq-bio.QM Ashish Acharya, Aman Al Amin, Hong Qin · Oct 14, 2026

This paper tackles the problem that agentic scientific workflows can finish without crashing yet still emit scientifically invalid results due to silent faults, stale inputs, or contaminated shared ancestors. The core idea is a directed acyclic graph harness that treats trust as a release decision: it enforces mandatory checks, contains failures to affected branches, and uses a fixed risk model plus optional validators to decide whether a deliverable may be released. Language-model agents operate inside this layer, choosing corrective actions and reviewing releases, but cannot override it. On two synthetic workflows with injected faults, the authors decompose which harness component supplies which property, finding that structure, not the LLM, drives reliability.

An agentic scientific workflow can run to completion and still release wrong results: a silent numerical error, a stale input, or a defect in a shared upstream step can contaminate several outputs while a sibling branch stays correct. We treat trust in such results as a release decision. A harness around the workflow's directed acyclic graph (DAG) decides which outputs may be used: it enforces mandatory checks, contains failures to the affected branch, recomputes from tracked versions, adds validators, and releases a result only if a risk model estimates its probability of being invalid as low. Language-model agents work inside the harness, choosing corrective actions and reviewing releases, but cannot override it. On 60 held-out paired instances of two workflows with injected faults, we switched components on and off. Each supplied a different property. Containment and recovery raised the number of correct results. Validation supplied safety: fixed rules without validation released 37 invalid results, while validating every candidate released none. Risk estimation supplied efficiency, matching that safety with 31% fewer validators at somewhat lower yield, although better targeting than random validation was not shown. Lineage evidence helped on one workflow. The language model added no measurable benefit: whether invalid results escaped depended on the harness, not the model. This proof of concept points to a practical path: placing agents inside explicit release-control structure can keep released scientific results trustworthy, and it gives more capable agents a measurable baseline to improve on.
0
eess.IVcs.CVq-bio.QM Song Zhiying, Ling Hanyi, Wu Junyi et al. · Oct 1, 2026

MorphoBranch tackles the problem of accurately quantifying fine, weakly labeled, and densely branched cellular structures—such as neuronal axons and microglial processes—from fluorescence microscopy images. The core idea is an integrated workbench that pairs a deterministic image-to-graph Morphometry Engine (multiscale ridge evidence, hysteresis segmentation, and evidence-constrained skeleton refinement) with an optional LLM-assisted Refinement Engine that translates natural-language instructions into editable, human-reviewable analysis plans. This separation of flexible interaction from deterministic computation aims to reduce operator-dependent bias while keeping morphometric workflows inspectable and reproducible.

Background and Objectives: Fluorescence-labeled cellular arbors provide readouts of neuronal and microglial morphology, but fine and weakly labeled processes are prone to fragmentation and false connections that bias skeleton-based measurements. We present MorphoBranch, a fine-structure-preserving, human-reviewable workbench for morphometry of branched cellular structures. Methods: MorphoBranch combines a deterministic Morphometry Engine with an LLM-assisted Refinement Engine. The Mor- phometry Engine implements an image-to-graph workflow integrating multiscale structural evidence extraction, hysteresis segmen- tation, evidence-constrained skeleton refinement, and graph-based morphometry. The Refinement Engine maps natural-language requests to registered actions for parameter adjustment, preview execution, metric reporting, and unsupported-request handling, while image processing and quantitative computation remain deterministic and reviewable. Results: MorphoBranch was evaluated on two public neuronal axon datasets, AxonMIP and AxonStack, and the in-house Cell- Morph dataset of microglial fluorescence images. It achieved the highest Skeleton F1 and clDice and the lowest length-estimation error among the evaluated methods on all three datasets, while also achieving the highest Dice and IoU on AxonMIP and Axon- Stack. Across 150 natural-language tasks, the Refinement Engine achieved a 94.0% end-to-end success rate. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that MorphoBranch provides a reproducible, human-reviewable workflow for mor- phometric analysis of branched cellular structures. It supports fine-structure-preserving quantification across neuronal axon and microglial fluorescence images while maintaining inspectable and reproducible analysis workflows.
0
cs.LGq-bio.QM Dongxia Wu, Shiye Su, Yuhui Zhang et al. · Mar 23, 2026

Virtual cell modeling aims to simulate cellular responses to drug perturbations in silico, but existing flow-matching models optimize only pixel-level reconstruction and can produce biologically implausible outputs like nuclei outside cytoplasm. CellFluxRL addresses this by post-training the state-of-the-art CellFlux model with reinforcement learning, using seven manually designed reward functions spanning biological function (mode of action), structural validity (nuclear containment), and morphological statistics (size/count). The approach reveals a systematic framework for enforcing physical constraints through differentiable optimization, achieving consistent improvements across all biological metrics while maintaining image quality.

Building virtual cells with generative models to simulate cellular behavior in silico is emerging as a promising paradigm for accelerating drug discovery. However, prior image-based generative approaches can produce implausible cell images that violate basic physical and biological constraints. To address this, we propose to post-train virtual cell models with reinforcement learning (RL), leveraging biologically meaningful evaluators as reward functions. We design seven rewards spanning three categories-biological function, structural validity, and morphological correctness-and optimize the state-of-the-art CellFlux model to yield CellFluxRL. CellFluxRL consistently improves over CellFlux across all rewards, with further performance boosts from test-time scaling. Overall, our results present a virtual cell modeling framework that enforces physically-based constraints through RL, advancing beyond "visually realistic" generations towards "biologically meaningful" ones.