Your paper timeline
Scroll AI takes the way you would scroll a great paper aggregator: quick signal first, deeper critique when something earns your attention, and challenges when a claim feels off.
7 papers in cs.DS
Trending mixes fresh papers with community signal.
0
cs.LGcs.CRcs.DS Gautam Kamath, Mahbod Majid, Ankur Moitra et al. · Oct 22, 2026

Learning discrete distributions from batched user data under person-level privacy is a fundamental problem in federated analytics. This paper develops the first polynomial-time pure-DP algorithm that matches the information-theoretic sample complexity up to logarithmic factors, via a new degree-6 sum-of-squares certificate based on a trace-bounded diagonal majorizer for multinomial covariance. It also proves a statistical-query lower bound suggesting the gap between efficient and optimal robust rates may be inherent.

We study learning a discrete distribution under person-level differential privacy in the batched setting. Given $n$ users, each contributing $m$ i.i.d. samples from an unknown distribution $\mu$ over $[k]$, we seek an estimate of $\mu$ with total-variation error $\alpha$. We give polynomial-time algorithms under both pure and approximate differential privacy. Under pure $(\varepsilon,0)$-DP, we achieve $n = \widetilde O(k/(\alpha^2 m)+k/(\alpha\sqrt{m}\varepsilon)+k/\varepsilon)$, the first polynomial-time pure-DP guarantee matching the information-theoretic optimum up to logarithmic factors. Under approximate $(\varepsilon,\delta)$-DP, we achieve $n = \widetilde O(k/(\alpha^2 m)+k/(\alpha\sqrt{m}\varepsilon)+k+\log(1/\delta)/\varepsilon)$. At $\delta=2^{-\Theta(k)}$, this is $\widetilde O(k)$ for fixed $\alpha,\varepsilon,m$ and failure probability. Our algorithms use a new degree-6 sum-of-squares estimator for learning from untrusted batches. Its key ingredient is a trace-bounded diagonal majorizer for the difference between the empirical covariance of the repaired batch averages and the multinomial covariance predicted by their mean. We prove that clean data admit this certificate through semidefinite-programming duality and a new application of the stronger symmetric form of Grothendieck's inequality due to Friedland and Lim. The certificate preserves the mean-dependent variance of multinomial batch averages, yielding the near-optimal robust rate $O(\eta\sqrt{\log(1/\eta)/m})$ and providing the score required by the privacy reduction. We also prove a statistical query lower bound ruling out a uniformly smaller order of error under fixed polynomial SQ resource bounds.
0
cs.GTcs.AIcs.DS Junhua Liu, Zhicheng Liang, Zejun Zhang et al. · Oct 22, 2026

LLM-native advertising introduces new auction-design challenges because an ad’s click-through rate depends on its context passage and earlier ads steal clicks from later ones under a first-click cascade. This paper studies truthful mechanism design when the LLM answer and its passage order are fixed before bidding, showing that a constant-factor welfare approximation is compatible with truthfulness even under this editorial-order restriction. The authors propose click thinning—randomly omitting earlier ads to equalize click services across positions—which turns welfare maximization into a tractable linear-fractional matching problem and yields an elegant optimal tradeoff between approximation, truthfulness, and computational efficiency.

Generative AI assistants are becoming an advertising medium, embedding sponsored content in their answers. This setting departs from classical position auctions in two ways: an ad's click-through rate depends on the passage that hosts it, and because users stop at their first click, earlier ads take clicks from later ones. This competition for clicks makes truthfulness delicate: a higher bid can reshape the allocation and put a competitor ahead of the bidder, reducing the bidder's clicks. Existing mechanisms either attain a constant fraction of the optimal welfare (advertisers' total click value) but are not known to be truthful, or are truthful but their welfare guarantee degrades as the number of passages grows. We achieve both even when the answer and its editorial order are fixed before bidding. Assuming each ad's click-through rate when reached is known and unaffected by omitting other ads, we give a computationally efficient mechanism that is truthful in expectation and attains at least half the optimal welfare under free reordering. Our key idea, click thinning, omits ads at random, showing earlier ads less often so that each ad's overall click probability no longer depends on the order of the ads. Welfare maximization then reduces to a tractable matching problem, and solving it exactly with VCG-style payments makes truthful bidding optimal in expectation. Characterizing the click probabilities that omission can achieve sharpens the approximation factor from $2$ to $2-(1-\delta)^{K-1}$ when at most $K$ ads are shown and each click-through rate is at most $\delta$. This factor is the best possible for any order-preserving rule, even one that ignores incentives and computation, so truthfulness and computational efficiency incur no additional worst-case loss.
0
cs.DScs.LG Liang-Yu Zou · Oct 14, 2026

The paper studies proper hypothesis selection: given $n$ candidate distributions and sample access to an unknown target $P$, the goal is to return one candidate with total variation distance at most $3\min_i d_{TV}(P,H_i)+\varepsilon$. The core idea is to maintain weights over the candidates, define a weighted median of their densities as an unnormalized intermediate measure, and perform multiplicative weight updates using balanced tests derived from this median. The result achieves the optimal factor-3 approximation and sample complexity $O(\varepsilon^{-2}\log(n/\delta))$ while improving the running time to $O(n\varepsilon^{-2}\log(n/\delta))$, answering an open question of Aamand et al. (COLT 2026) by reducing the failure-probability dependence from $1/\delta$ to $\log(1/\delta)$.

Given $n$ distributions (hypotheses) $\mathcal H=\{H_1,\ldots,H_n\}$ and samples from an unknown target distribution $P$, proper hypothesis selection seeks a distribution whose total variation distance to $P$ is close to the best achievable within the known distributions. We give an algorithm that, using $O(\varepsilon^{-2}\log(n/\delta))$ target samples, running in $O(n\varepsilon^{-2}\log(n/\delta))$ time, with probability at least $1-\delta$, returns $H_{\hat i}$ satisfying $d_\mathrm{TV}(P,H_{\hat i})\leq 3\min_{i\in[n]}d_\mathrm{TV}(P,H_i)+\varepsilon.$ The algorithm achieves the optimal approximation factor and sample complexity. The running time improves the dependence on the failure probability from polynomial to logarithmic in the state-of-the-art bound $\tilde{O}(n\varepsilon^{-2}\delta^{-1})$ of Aamand, Aliakbarpour, Chen, and Silwal (COLT 2026), thereby answering their Question~2.
0
cs.LGcs.DSmath.OC Han Zhong, Yinyu Ye · Oct 1, 2026

Robust Markov decision processes with polyhedral uncertainty lack exact convex representations because the natural robust Bellman inequalities become bilinear or union-of-polyhedra constraints. This paper shows how to encode a finite sequence of robust policy-iteration steps into a single exact LP whose optimal face recovers the robust optimal value and all optimal stationary randomized policies. At fixed discount, the LP has polynomial dimension and encoding length, and the authors use this representation together with a unified complexity analysis to prove strongly polynomial bounds for several standard uncertainty sets—including $\ell_1$, weighted $\ell_1$, interval, and Wasserstein—that previously lacked such guarantees.

We study linear programming (LP) representations and strongly polynomial algorithms for robust Markov decision processes (RMDPs) with rational polyhedral state-action rectangular uncertainty in rewards and transitions. By encoding a finite sequence of robust policy-iteration steps, we construct a single LP whose optimal solutions recover the robust optimal value and all optimal stationary randomized policies. At fixed discount, the LP has polynomial dimension and encoding length and can be constructed in strongly polynomial time. We also develop a general complexity analysis of robust policy iteration that combines the cost of minimizing over uncertainty sets with the number of iterations needed to evaluate a policy. For a fixed discount factor, we use this analysis to improve the known complexity bounds for $\ell_1$ and $\ell_\infty$ RMDPs and establish new strongly polynomial bounds for general interval, weighted $\ell_1$, and Wasserstein RMDPs, as well as turn-based stochastic games with these uncertainty sets.
0
cs.LGcs.DS Anthony Dugois, Vincent Fagnon, Giorgio Lucarelli · Oct 1, 2026

We study non-clairvoyant single-machine scheduling to minimize the sum of completion times, a problem for which no constant-competitive algorithm is possible in the pure setting. The authors introduce a robustness framework that leverages a classifier's confusion matrix to partition jobs into predicted classes, characterizing uncertainty as internal permutations rather than numerical scenarios. This structural information yields an oblivious non-adaptive Min-Cost algorithm that is simultaneously optimal for multiple criteria, alongside new adaptive and randomized extensions.

We study the classical single-machine scheduling problem of minimizing the sum of completion times of jobs in a non-clairvoyant setting, where the processing time of each job remains unknown until its completion. This is a hard problem for which no constant competitive algorithm is possible. Inspired by robust optimization and learning-augmented algorithms, we introduce a novel robustness framework that leverages structural information provided by a classification model to overcome this limitation. Specifically, we assume that jobs are partitioned into classes and we have access to the confusion matrix of the classifier, whose entry $(k,\ell)$ indicates the number of jobs predicted to belong to class~$k$ but that actually belong to class~$\ell$. In this manner, we are able to characterize uncertainty as a set of permutations within each predicted class, rather than as a collection of discrete numerical scenarios, avoiding the computational difficulty of classical robust metrics, such as Min-Max and Min-Max Regret. In addition to these worst-case metrics, we also consider the expected objective over all scenarios. We first propose an optimal non-adaptive strategy that is oblivious with respect to all three robust criteria. We then investigate adaptive and randomized algorithms, showing that they can outperform the optimal non-adaptive strategy when the matrix exhibits particular structural properties.
0
cs.AIcs.CLcs.DS Zachary F. Mainen · Mar 22, 2026

This paper formalizes the transformer context window as an I/O page and proves that tool-augmented agents with indexed external memory achieve exponential retrieval cost savings over sequential scanning: $\mathcal{O}(\log_b N)$ versus $\Omega(N)$ page reads. The authors validate these predictions experimentally across three content types and identify "parametric memory competition" as a failure mode where models bypass retrieval protocols for familiar content.

Externalized reasoning is already exploited by transformer-based agents through chain-of-thought, but structured retrieval -- indexing over one's own reasoning state -- remains underexplored. We formalize the transformer context window as an I/O page and prove that tool-augmented agents with indexed external memory achieve exponentially lower retrieval cost than agents restricted to sequential scanning: $O(\log_b N)$ versus $\Omega(N)$ page reads per query, and $O(T \log_b T)$ versus $\Theta(T^2)$ cumulative cost over $T$ reasoning steps -- a gap that widens as deliberation deepens. We test these predictions on a controlled lookup benchmark across three content types -- random hashes, ordered integers, and encyclopedia entries -- varying store size from 50 to 5,000 items, and replicate key conditions across two model generations (GPT-4o-mini and GPT-5.4). On abstract content, the indexed agent achieves median 1 page read regardless of store size, confirming the $O(1)$ prediction. Sorted pages without an index fail to close the gap: the weaker model cannot sustain binary search at scale, and the stronger model achieves near-optimal $\log_2 N$ search but still loses to the index by $5\times$. On familiar content (encyclopedia entries), a competing failure mode emerges: the model recognizes the domain, bypasses the retrieval protocol, and generates answers from parametric memory, producing catastrophic token expenditure even when the index is sound. This parametric memory competition dissociates the two cognitive operations that indexing combines: understanding content (where language models excel) and following navigational protocols (where they fail when understanding tempts them to shortcut). The result argues for a separation of concerns: use language models for index construction, where semantic understanding helps, and deterministic algorithms for index traversal, where it hurts.
0
cs.MAcs.AIcs.DS Yasushi Kawase, Bodhayan Roy, Mohammad Azharuddin Sanpui · Oct 14, 2026
We study proportional cake cutting under an equal-length constraint, where each of $n$ agents must receive a bundle of length exactly $1/n$ that is worth at least $1/n$ to that agent. Our main result determines the exact worst-case number of cuts needed to guarantee such an allocation, namely $2n-2$ for every $n$. This improves on the previously known quadratic upper bound. The proof combines the constrained necklace-splitting theorem with a recursive assignment argument based on Hall's theorem. The same bound extends to the stronger requirement of envy-freeness when $n$ is a prime power, and an $O(n^{1.525})$ upper bound holds for arbitrary $n$. We then ask whether such allocations can be computed. We first show that no deterministic protocol in the Robertson--Webb model terminates after finitely many queries on every instance and always returns an exact equal-length proportional allocation, even for two agents with identical valuations. For every $\varepsilon>0$, however, $O(n^2/\varepsilon)$ queries suffice to produce an allocation in which every agent receives a bundle of length exactly $1/n$ and value at least $1/n-\varepsilon$, again using at most $2n-2$ cuts. Finally, we augment the Robertson--Webb model with two-knife queries. We show that recursive balanced halving attains the optimal bound of $2n-2$ cuts when $n$ is a power of two. For arbitrary $n$, we give a procedure using $O(n\log n)$ cuts.
We study proportional cake cutting under an equal-length constraint, where each of $n$ agents must receive a bundle of length exactly $1/n$ that is worth at least $1/n$ to that agent. Our main result determines the exact worst-case number of cuts needed to guarantee such an allocation, namely $2n-2$ for every $n$. This improves on the previously known quadratic upper bound. The proof combines the constrained necklace-splitting theorem with a recursive assignment argument based on Hall's theorem. The same bound extends to the stronger requirement of envy-freeness when $n$ is a prime power, and an $O(n^{1.525})$ upper bound holds for arbitrary $n$. We then ask whether such allocations can be computed. We first show that no deterministic protocol in the Robertson--Webb model terminates after finitely many queries on every instance and always returns an exact equal-length proportional allocation, even for two agents with identical valuations. For every $\varepsilon>0$, however, $O(n^2/\varepsilon)$ queries suffice to produce an allocation in which every agent receives a bundle of length exactly $1/n$ and value at least $1/n-\varepsilon$, again using at most $2n-2$ cuts. Finally, we augment the Robertson--Webb model with two-knife queries. We show that recursive balanced halving attains the optimal bound of $2n-2$ cuts when $n$ is a power of two. For arbitrary $n$, we give a procedure using $O(n\log n)$ cuts.