Your paper timeline
Scroll AI takes the way you would scroll a great paper aggregator: quick signal first, deeper critique when something earns your attention, and challenges when a claim feels off.
91 papers in cs.CL
Trending mixes fresh papers with community signal.
0
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG Tin Van Huynh, Kiet Van Nguyen, Ngan Luu-Thuy Nguyen · Mar 22, 2026

ViCLSR adapts supervised contrastive learning (SimCSE-style) to Vietnamese NLU by converting NLI entailment and contradiction pairs into positive and negative training signals. Built on XLM-R Large (550M), the framework improves sentence embeddings for low-resource Vietnamese, reporting gains of +6.97% F1 over PhoBERT on ViNLI and state-of-the-art results across five downstream tasks including fact-checking and machine reading comprehension.

High-quality text representations are crucial for natural language understanding (NLU), but low-resource languages like Vietnamese face challenges due to limited annotated data. While pre-trained models like PhoBERT and CafeBERT perform well, their effectiveness is constrained by data scarcity. Contrastive learning (CL) has recently emerged as a promising approach for improving sentence representations, enabling models to effectively distinguish between semantically similar and dissimilar sentences. We propose ViCLSR (Vietnamese Contrastive Learning for Sentence Representations), a novel supervised contrastive learning framework specifically designed to optimize sentence embeddings for Vietnamese, leveraging existing natural language inference (NLI) datasets. Additionally, we propose a process to adapt existing Vietnamese datasets for supervised learning, ensuring compatibility with CL methods. Our experiments demonstrate that ViCLSR significantly outperforms the powerful monolingual pre-trained model PhoBERT on five benchmark NLU datasets such as ViNLI (+6.97% F1), ViWikiFC (+4.97% F1), ViFactCheck (+9.02% F1), UIT-ViCTSD (+5.36% F1), and ViMMRC2.0 (+4.33% Accuracy). ViCLSR shows that supervised contrastive learning can effectively address resource limitations in Vietnamese NLU tasks and improve sentence representation learning for low-resource languages. Furthermore, we conduct an in-depth analysis of the experimental results to uncover the factors contributing to the superior performance of contrastive learning models. ViCLSR is released for research purposes in advancing natural language processing tasks.
0
cs.CLcs.AIcs.SD Tianle Yang, Chengzhe Sun, Phil Rose et al. · Mar 22, 2026

This paper investigates whether neural text-to-speech systems capture consonant-induced F0 perturbation—fine-grained phonetic effects where voiceless obstruents raise and voiced obstruents lower fundamental frequency relative to sonorants. The authors propose a segmental-level prosodic probing framework comparing Tacotron 2 and FastSpeech 2 against natural speech, stratifying by lexical frequency to test memorization versus abstraction. This matters because TTS evaluation often misses sub-phonemic articulatory detail that distinguishes human-like phonetic competence from surface pattern matching.

This study proposes a segmental-level prosodic probing framework to evaluate neural TTS models' ability to reproduce consonant-induced f0 perturbation, a fine-grained segmental-prosodic effect that reflects local articulatory mechanisms. We compare synthetic and natural speech realizations for thousands of words, stratified by lexical frequency, using Tacotron 2 and FastSpeech 2 trained on the same speech corpus (LJ Speech). These controlled analyses are then complemented by a large-scale evaluation spanning multiple advanced TTS systems. Results show accurate reproduction for high-frequency words but poor generalization to low-frequency items, suggesting that the examined TTS architectures rely more on lexical-level memorization than on abstract segmental-prosodic encoding. This finding highlights a limitation in such TTS systems' ability to generalize prosodic detail beyond seen data. The proposed probe offers a linguistically informed diagnostic framework that may inform future TTS evaluation methods, and has implications for interpretability and authenticity assessment in synthetic speech.
0
cs.CLcs.AI Vinay Sharma, Manish Jain · Mar 22, 2026

This paper evaluates three inference-time strategies—self-consistency with temperature/top-p sampling, dual-model cross-verification, and iterative self-reflection—to improve multi-step reasoning in LLMs without parameter updates. The core premise is that aggregating diverse reasoning traces or validating across models yields more reliable outputs than single-pass decoding. The work addresses a practical need for deployment scenarios where retraining is infeasible, though the experimental scope is limited by unclear model specifications and dataset choices.

Large Language Models (LLMs) often exhibit strong linguistic abilities while remaining unreliable on multi-step reasoning tasks, particularly when deployed without additional training or fine-tuning. In this work, we study inference-time techniques to improve the reasoning accuracy of LLMs. We systematically evaluate three classes of inference-time strategies: (i) self-consistency via stochastic decoding, where the model is sampled multiple times using controlled temperature and nucleus sampling and the most frequent final answer is selected; (ii) dual-model reasoning agreement, where outputs from two independent models are compared and only consistent reasoning traces are trusted; and (iii) self-reflection, where the model critiques and revises its own reasoning. Across all evaluated methods, we employ Chain-of-Thought (CoT) [1] prompting to elicit explicit intermediate reasoning steps before generating final answers. In this work, we provide a controlled comparative evaluation across three inference-time strategies under identical prompting and verification settings. Our experiments on LLM [2] show that self-consistency with nucleus sampling and controlled temperature value yields the substantial gains, achieving a 9% to 15% absolute improvement in accuracy over greedy single-pass decoding, well-suited for low-risk domains, offering meaningful gains with minimal overhead. The dual-model approach provides additional confirmation for model reasoning steps thus more appropriate for moderate-risk domains, where higher reliability justifies additional compute. Self-reflection offers only marginal improvements, suggesting limited effectiveness for smaller non-reasoning models at inference time.
0
cs.CLcs.AI Runze Sun, Yu Zheng, Zexuan Xiong et al. · Mar 22, 2026

This paper tackles multimodal hate speech detection where hateful intent emerges from complex interactions between text and images—what the authors call "more than the sum of its parts." The core innovation is the Stratified Multimodal Interaction (SMI) paradigm, which categorizes eight distinct cross-modal interaction patterns into three difficulty levels (Easy, Normal, Hard), coupled with the ARCADE framework that simulates an asymmetric courtroom debate between Prosecutor, Defender, and Judge agents to decipher subtle intent shifts. This matters because current detection systems fail when hateful content is constructed implicitly through benign-seeming modalities that only become toxic in combination.

Combating hate speech on social media is critical for securing cyberspace, yet relies heavily on the efficacy of automated detection systems. As content formats evolve, hate speech is transitioning from solely plain text to complex multimodal expressions, making implicit attacks harder to spot. Current systems, however, often falter on these subtle cases, as they struggle with multimodal content where the emergent meaning transcends the aggregation of individual modalities. To bridge this gap, we move beyond binary classification to characterize semantic intent shifts where modalities interact to construct implicit hate from benign cues or neutralize toxicity through semantic inversion. Guided by this fine-grained formulation, we curate the Hate via Vision-Language Interplay (H-VLI) benchmark where the true intent hinges on the intricate interplay of modalities rather than overt visual or textual slurs. To effectively decipher these complex cues, we further propose the Asymmetric Reasoning via Courtroom Agent DEbate (ARCADE) framework. By simulating a judicial process where agents actively argue for accusation and defense, ARCADE forces the model to scrutinize deep semantic cues before reaching a verdict. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ARCADE significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on H-VLI, particularly for challenging implicit cases, while maintaining competitive performance on established benchmarks. Our code and data are available at: https://github.com/Sayur1n/H-VLI
0
cs.CLcs.AIcs.HC Pranav Hemanth, Sampriti Saha · Mar 22, 2026

This paper tackles logical context poisoning—the degradation of LLM responses when flat, linear conversation structures force topically distinct threads to accumulate in a single unbounded context window. The core idea is the Conversation Tree Architecture (CTA), which models conversations as a directed rooted tree $\mathcal{T}=(V,E,r,W)$ where each node $v \in V$ maintains an isolated local context window $w_v$. Structured flow operations—downstream passing $\phi_{\downarrow}$, upstream merging $\psi_{\uparrow}$, and volatile nodes—govern how context moves between branches. This matters because current interfaces offer no middle ground between discarding context (new chat) and accumulating noise (linear threads).

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed for extended, multi-topic conversations, yet the flat, append-only structure of current conversation interfaces introduces a fundamental limitation: all context accumulates in a single unbounded window, causing topically distinct threads to bleed into one another and progressively degrade response quality. We term this failure mode logical context poisoning. In this paper, we introduce the Conversation Tree Architecture (CTA), a hierarchical framework that organizes LLM conversations as trees of discrete, context-isolated nodes. Each node maintains its own local context window; structured mechanisms govern how context flows between parent and child nodes, downstream on branch creation and upstream on branch deletion. We additionally introduce volatile nodes, transient branches whose local context must be selectively merged upward or permanently discarded before purging. We formalize the architecture's primitives, characterize the open design problems in context flow, relate our framework to prior work in LLM memory management, and describe a working prototype implementation. The CTA provides a principled foundation for structured conversational context management and extends naturally to multi-agent settings.
0
cs.CLcs.AIcs.DL Sai Koneru, Jian Wu, Sarah Rajtmajer · Mar 22, 2026

Extracting hypotheses and their supporting statistical evidence from full-text scientific articles is challenging due to document length and the distribution of scientific arguments across sections. This paper proposes a two-stage retrieve-and-extract pipeline that first links an abstract finding to its corresponding hypothesis, then extracts the statistical evidence supporting that hypothesis. Through controlled ablations varying context quantity ($k \in \{5, 10, 20\}$), retrieval quality (standard RAG, reranking, fine-tuned retriever), and oracle paragraph settings, the authors demonstrate that hypothesis extraction is primarily bounded by retrieval quality, while evidence extraction faces persistent extractor limitations even with perfect paragraph selection.

Extracting hypotheses and their supporting statistical evidence from full-text scientific articles is central to the synthesis of empirical findings, but remains difficult due to document length and the distribution of scientific arguments across sections of the paper. The work studies a sequential full-text extraction setting, where the statement of a primary finding in an article's abstract is linked to (i) a corresponding hypothesis statement in the paper body and (ii) the statistical evidence that supports or refutes that hypothesis. This formulation induces a challenging within-document retrieval setting in which many candidate paragraphs are topically related to the finding but differ in rhetorical role, creating hard negatives for retrieval and extraction. Using a two-stage retrieve-and-extract framework, we conduct a controlled study of retrieval design choices, varying context quantity, context quality (standard Retrieval Augmented Generation, reranking, and a fine-tuned retriever paired with reranking), as well as an oracle paragraph setting to separate retrieval failures from extraction limits across four Large Language Model extractors. We find that targeted context selection consistently improves hypothesis extraction relative to full-text prompting, with gains concentrated in configurations that optimize retrieval quality and context cleanliness. In contrast, statistical evidence extraction remains substantially harder. Even with oracle paragraphs, performance remains moderate, indicating persistent extractor limitations in handling hybrid numeric-textual statements rather than retrieval failures alone.
0
cs.AIcs.CLcs.DS Zachary F. Mainen · Mar 22, 2026

This paper formalizes the transformer context window as an I/O page and proves that tool-augmented agents with indexed external memory achieve exponential retrieval cost savings over sequential scanning: $\mathcal{O}(\log_b N)$ versus $\Omega(N)$ page reads. The authors validate these predictions experimentally across three content types and identify "parametric memory competition" as a failure mode where models bypass retrieval protocols for familiar content.

Externalized reasoning is already exploited by transformer-based agents through chain-of-thought, but structured retrieval -- indexing over one's own reasoning state -- remains underexplored. We formalize the transformer context window as an I/O page and prove that tool-augmented agents with indexed external memory achieve exponentially lower retrieval cost than agents restricted to sequential scanning: $O(\log_b N)$ versus $\Omega(N)$ page reads per query, and $O(T \log_b T)$ versus $\Theta(T^2)$ cumulative cost over $T$ reasoning steps -- a gap that widens as deliberation deepens. We test these predictions on a controlled lookup benchmark across three content types -- random hashes, ordered integers, and encyclopedia entries -- varying store size from 50 to 5,000 items, and replicate key conditions across two model generations (GPT-4o-mini and GPT-5.4). On abstract content, the indexed agent achieves median 1 page read regardless of store size, confirming the $O(1)$ prediction. Sorted pages without an index fail to close the gap: the weaker model cannot sustain binary search at scale, and the stronger model achieves near-optimal $\log_2 N$ search but still loses to the index by $5\times$. On familiar content (encyclopedia entries), a competing failure mode emerges: the model recognizes the domain, bypasses the retrieval protocol, and generates answers from parametric memory, producing catastrophic token expenditure even when the index is sound. This parametric memory competition dissociates the two cognitive operations that indexing combines: understanding content (where language models excel) and following navigational protocols (where they fail when understanding tempts them to shortcut). The result argues for a separation of concerns: use language models for index construction, where semantic understanding helps, and deterministic algorithms for index traversal, where it hurts.
0
cs.AIcs.CL Jianing Wang, Jianfei Zhang, Qi Guo et al. · Mar 22, 2026

LongCat-Flash-Prover is a 560B-parameter MoE open-source model targeting native formal reasoning in Lean4. The core innovation is decomposing formal theorem proving into three agentic capabilities—auto-formalization, sketching, and proving—trained via a Hybrid-Experts Iteration Framework and a novel RL algorithm called HisPO. The work claims state-of-the-art results on MiniF2F-Test (97.1%), ProverBench (70.8%), and PutnamBench (41.5%) with remarkably low inference budgets compared to prior open-source provers.

We introduce LongCat-Flash-Prover, a flagship 560-billion-parameter open-source Mixture-of- Experts (MoE) model that advances Native Formal Reasoning in Lean4 through agentic tool-integrated reasoning (TIR). We decompose the native formal reasoning task into three independent formal capabilities, i.e., auto-formalization, sketching, and proving. To facilitate these capabilities, we propose a Hybrid-Experts Iteration Framework to expand high-quality task trajectories, including generating a formal statement based on a given informal problem, producing a whole-proof directly from the statement, or a lemma-style sketch. During agentic RL, we present a Hierarchical Importance Sampling Policy Optimization (HisPO) algorithm, which aims to stabilize the MoE model training on such long-horizon tasks. It employs a gradient masking strategy that accounts for the policy staleness and the inherent train-inference engine discrepancies at both sequence and token levels. Additionally, we also incorporate theorem consistency and legality detection mechanisms to eliminate reward hacking issues. Extensive evaluations show that our LongCat-Flash-Prover sets a new state-of-the-art for open-weights models in both auto-formalization and theorem proving. Demonstrating remarkable sample efficiency, it achieves a 97.1% pass rate on MiniF2F-Test using only 72 inference budget per problem. On more challenging benchmarks, it solves 70.8% of ProverBench and 41.5% of PutnamBench with no more than 220 attempts per problem, significantly outperforming existing open-weights baselines.
0
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG Jinquan Zheng, Jia Yuan, Jiacheng Yao et al. · Mar 22, 2026

This paper addresses selection bias (position and label bias) in large language models during discrete-choice tasks like multiple-choice questions and pairwise evaluation. The authors propose Permutation-Aware GRPO (PA-GRPO), which extends Group Relative Policy Optimization by treating different permutations of the same question as a single training group rather than independent instances. The method enforces semantic consistency across permutations through two mechanisms: a cross-permutation advantage that computes rewards relative to the group mean, and a consistency-aware reward that penalizes disagreement across permutations. Experiments across seven benchmarks and three models (Llama-3.1-8B, Qwen3-8B, Qwen3-32B) demonstrate that PA-GRPO reduces selection bias while maintaining accuracy.

Large language models (LLMs) used for multiple-choice and pairwise evaluation tasks often exhibit selection bias due to non-semantic factors like option positions and label symbols. Existing inference-time debiasing is costly and may harm reasoning, while pointwise training ignores that the same question should yield consistent answers across permutations. To address this issue, we propose Permutation-Aware Group Relative Policy Optimization (PA-GRPO), which mitigates selection bias by enforcing permutation-consistent semantic reasoning. PA-GRPO constructs a permutation group for each instance by generating multiple candidate permutations, and optimizes the model using two complementary mechanisms: (1) cross-permutation advantage, which computes advantages relative to the mean reward over all permutations of the same instance, and (2) consistency-aware reward, which encourages the model to produce consistent decisions across different permutations. Experimental results demonstrate that PA-GRPO outperforms strong baselines across seven benchmarks, substantially reducing selection bias while maintaining high overall performance. The code will be made available on Github (https://github.com/ECNU-Text-Computing/PA-GRPO).
0
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL Abhinaba Basu · Mar 22, 2026

This paper investigates why compressing different weight matrices in transformers leads to wildly different outcomes—from negligible impact to 20,000× perplexity increases. The authors map this structural sensitivity across five architectures, revealing that early-layer MLP up-projections are catastrophically fragile while value projections are nearly free to compress. Using Lyapunov stability theory, they explain how residual connections contract errors, and they provide machine-checked formal bounds in Lean 4 to guarantee per-matrix approximation quality.

A single matrix out of 468 in GPT-2 Small can increase perplexity by 20,000x when compressed, revealing that transformer compression sensitivity spans five orders of magnitude. We map this sensitivity landscape across five architectures (117M-8B parameters), finding a consistent hierarchy: early-layer MLP up-projections are catastrophically sensitive while value projections compress nearly for free. This hierarchy is stable across compression levels, evaluation scales (2K-51K tokens), and datasets (WikiText-103, C4). Using Lyapunov stability theory, we show that residual connections contract compression errors by growing the hidden state faster than the error. Error contraction is necessary but not sufficient for compression tolerance: architecture-specific redundancy plays an equally important role, as demonstrated by the hybrid LFM2-2.6B degrading only 7x despite higher amplification than the fully-contracting GPT-2 Small (120x). Ten machine-checked Lean 4 theorems formalize per-matrix error bounds with no sorry markers; all bounds produce zero violations across 14,040+ configurations. We validate with downstream task evaluation (HellaSwag, ARC-Easy, Winogrande), activation-aware pruning on two architectures, and a Compression Fragility Index that rank-orders model robustness.
0
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG NVIDIA, :, Aaron Blakeman et al. · Dec 24, 2025

NVIDIA introduces Nemotron 3, a family of open language models (Nano, Super, Ultra) built on a hybrid Mamba-Transformer MoE architecture. The core innovation is using selective attention layers combined with Mamba-2 state space layers to achieve high throughput while maintaining accuracy. Key technical contributions include LatentMoE (dimensionality-reduced expert routing), NVFP4 training for efficiency, and multi-environment RL post-training. The paper positions these models as optimized for agentic AI with up to 1M token contexts and granular inference-time reasoning budget control.

We introduce the Nemotron 3 family of models - Nano, Super, and Ultra. These models deliver strong agentic, reasoning, and conversational capabilities. The Nemotron 3 family uses a Mixture-of-Experts hybrid Mamba-Transformer architecture to provide best-in-class throughput and context lengths of up to 1M tokens. Super and Ultra models are trained with NVFP4 and incorporate LatentMoE, a novel approach that improves model quality. The two larger models also include MTP layers for faster text generation. All Nemotron 3 models are post-trained using multi-environment reinforcement learning enabling reasoning, multi-step tool use, and support granular reasoning budget control. Nano, the smallest model, outperforms comparable models in accuracy while remaining extremely cost-efficient for inference. Super is optimized for collaborative agents and high-volume workloads such as IT ticket automation. Ultra, the largest model, provides state-of-the-art accuracy and reasoning performance. Nano is released together with its technical report and this white paper, while Super and Ultra will follow in the coming months. We will openly release the model weights, pre- and post-training software, recipes, and all data for which we hold redistribution rights.