Your paper timeline
Scroll AI takes the way you would scroll a great paper aggregator: quick signal first, deeper critique when something earns your attention, and challenges when a claim feels off.
297 papers in cs.CL
Trending mixes fresh papers with community signal.
0
cs.CLcs.LG Bowen Chen, Namgi Han, Yusuke Miyao · Mar 23, 2026

This paper presents a large-scale comparative study of memorization across six open LLM families (Pythia, OLMo1/2/3, OpenLLaMA, StarCoder) ranging from 1B to 32B parameters. By analyzing both statistical patterns and internal mechanisms (attention heads, layer decoding), it identifies universal behaviors—such as log-linear scaling of memorization rates with model size and high compressibility of memorized sequences—while revealing family-specific signatures in memorization structure. The work bridges isolated findings from single-model studies to establish general principles of how transformers memorize training data.

Memorization is a fundamental component of intelligence for both humans and LLMs. However, while LLM performance scales rapidly, our understanding of memorization lags. Due to limited access to the pre-training data of LLMs, most previous studies focus on a single model series, leading to isolated observations among series, making it unclear which findings are general or specific. In this study, we collect multiple model series (Pythia, OpenLLaMa, StarCoder, OLMo1/2/3) and analyze their shared or unique memorization behavior at both the statistical and internal levels, connecting individual observations while showing new findings. At the statistical level, we reveal that the memorization rate scales log-linearly with model size, and memorized sequences can be further compressed. Further analysis demonstrated a shared frequency and domain distribution pattern for memorized sequences. However, different models also show individual features under the above observations. At the internal level, we find that LLMs can remove certain injected perturbations, while memorized sequences are more sensitive. By decoding middle layers and attention head ablation, we revealed the general decoding process and shared important heads for memorization. However, the distribution of those important heads differs between families, showing a unique family-level feature. Through bridging various experiments and revealing new findings, this study paves the way for a universal and fundamental understanding of memorization in LLM.
0
cs.AIcs.CL Andreas Sauter, Yuyue Zhao, Jacopo Urbani et al. · Mar 23, 2026

EvoIdeator addresses the challenge of iteratively refining scientific research ideas using LLMs by bridging the gap between scalar RL rewards and coarse language feedback. The core innovation is a dual-signal approach combining lexicographic rewards with checklist-grounded, span-level language feedback integrated directly into the RL training loop using Dr. GRPO. This allows a 4B parameter model to outperform larger frontier models like Gemini 3 Flash and DeepSeek-V3.2 on scientific rigor criteria.

Scientific idea generation is a cornerstone of autonomous knowledge discovery, yet the iterative evolution required to transform initial concepts into high-quality research proposals remains a formidable challenge for Large Language Models (LLMs). Existing Reinforcement Learning (RL) paradigms often rely on rubric-based scalar rewards that provide global quality scores but lack actionable granularity. Conversely, language-based refinement methods are typically confined to inference-time prompting, targeting models that are not explicitly optimized to internalize such critiques. To bridge this gap, we propose \textbf{EvoIdeator}, a framework that facilitates the evolution of scientific ideas by aligning the RL training objective with \textbf{checklist-grounded feedback}. EvoIdeator leverages a structured judge model to generate two synergistic signals: (1) \emph{lexicographic rewards} for multi-dimensional optimization, and (2) \emph{fine-grained language feedback} that offers span-level critiques regarding grounding, feasibility, and methodological rigor. By integrating these signals into the RL loop, we condition the policy to systematically utilize precise feedback during both optimization and inference. Extensive experiments demonstrate that EvoIdeator, built on Qwen3-4B, significantly outperforms much larger frontier models across key scientific metrics. Crucially, the learned policy exhibits strong generalization to diverse external feedback sources without further fine-tuning, offering a scalable and rigorous path toward self-refining autonomous ideation.
0
cs.CLcs.AI Ulugbek Shernazarov, Rostislav Svitsov, Bin Shi · Mar 23, 2026

Medical text summarization helps clinicians process millions of biomedical articles, but fine-tuning large language models demands prohibitive resources. This paper compares Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), Prompt Tuning, and full fine-tuning across Flan-T5-Small, Base, and Large on PubMed summarization. The counter-intuitive finding is that updating fewer than 1% of parameters via LoRA consistently outperforms full fine-tuning, suggesting that low-rank constraints provide effective regularization.

Fine-tuning large language models for domain-specific tasks such as medical text summarization demands substantial computational resources. Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods offer promising alternatives by updating only a small fraction of parameters. This paper compares three adaptation approaches-Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), Prompt Tuning, and Full Fine-Tuning-across the Flan-T5 model family on the PubMed medical summarization dataset. Through experiments with multiple random seeds, we demonstrate that LoRA consistently outperforms full fine-tuning, achieving 43.52 +/- 0.18 ROUGE-1 on Flan-T5-Large with only 0.6% trainable parameters compared to 40.67 +/- 0.21 for full fine-tuning. Sensitivity analyses examine the impact of LoRA rank and prompt token count. Our findings suggest the low-rank constraint provides beneficial regularization, challenging assumptions about the necessity of full parameter updates. Code is available at https://github.com/eracoding/llm-medical-summarization
0
cs.CLcs.LG Saketh Vinjamuri, Marielle Fis Loperena, Marie C. Spezia et al. · Mar 22, 2026

Time toxicity—the cumulative healthcare contact days imposed by clinical trial participation—is an important patient-centric metric buried in dense Schedule of Assessments (SoA) tables. This work proposes TimeTox, a Gemini-based LLM pipeline that extracts time toxicity from protocol PDFs at scale, comparing a single-pass architecture against a two-stage structure-then-count approach. The authors deploy their system on 644 real-world oncology protocols and find that synthetic benchmark accuracy is a poor predictor of real-world reliability, a lesson critical for clinical NLP deployment.

Time toxicity, the cumulative healthcare contact days from clinical trial participation, is an important but labor-intensive metric to extract from protocol documents. We developed TimeTox, an LLM-based pipeline for automated extraction of time toxicity from Schedule of Assessments tables. TimeTox uses Google's Gemini models in three stages: summary extraction from full-length protocol PDFs, time toxicity quantification at six cumulative timepoints for each treatment arm, and multi-run consensus via position-based arm matching. We validated against 20 synthetic schedules (240 comparisons) and assessed reproducibility on 644 real-world oncology protocols. Two architectures were compared: single-pass (vanilla) and two-stage (structure-then-count). The two-stage pipeline achieved 100% clinically acceptable accuracy ($\pm$3 days) on synthetic data (MAE 0.81 days) versus 41.5% for vanilla (MAE 9.0 days). However, on real-world protocols, the vanilla pipeline showed superior reproducibility: 95.3% clinically acceptable accuracy (IQR $\leq$ 3 days) across 3 runs on 644 protocols, with 82.0% perfect stability (IQR = 0). The production pipeline extracted time toxicity for 1,288 treatment arms across multiple disease sites. Extraction stability on real-world data, rather than accuracy on synthetic benchmarks, is the decisive factor for production LLM deployment.
0
cs.CLcs.AI Pengfei Cao, Mingxuan Yang, Yubo Chen et al. · Mar 23, 2026

This paper introduces SemEval-2026 Task 12, Abductive Event Reasoning (AER), a shared task requiring systems to identify the most plausible direct cause of a target event from noisy multi-document evidence. The task is cast as an evidence-grounded multiple-choice benchmark with multiple correct answers allowed, capturing challenges like distributed evidence, indirect background factors, and semantically related distractors. With 122 participants and 518 submissions, it represents a significant community effort to benchmark real-world causal reasoning in long-context settings.

Understanding why real-world events occur is important for both natural language processing and practical decision-making, yet direct-cause inference remains underexplored in evidence-rich settings. To address this gap, we organized SemEval-2026 Task 12: Abductive Event Reasoning (AER).\footnote{The task data is available at https://github.com/sooo66/semeval2026-task12-dataset.git} The task asks systems to identify the most plausible direct cause of a target event from supporting evidence. We formulate AER as an evidence-grounded multiple-choice benchmark that captures key challenges of real-world causal reasoning, including distributed evidence, indirect background factors, and semantically related but non-causal distractors. The shared task attracted 122 participants and received 518 submissions. This paper presents the task formulation, dataset construction pipeline, evaluation setup, and system results. AER provides a focused benchmark for abductive reasoning over real-world events and highlights challenges for future work on causal reasoning and multi-document understanding.
0
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL Xinyan Wang, Xiaogeng Liu, Chaowei Xiao · Mar 23, 2026

ROM tackles overthinking in Large Reasoning Models, where models generate redundant reasoning after reaching correct answers. The core idea is a lightweight streaming detector—an 8.13M parameter head attached to late-layer hidden states of a frozen LLM—that predicts overthinking probability token-by-token and triggers early stopping. It matters because it promises 47% token reduction without full model retraining. We find the method empirically effective but note concerns regarding data scaling limits and labeling costs.

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) achieve strong accuracy on challenging tasks by generating long Chain-of-Thought traces, but suffer from overthinking. Even after reaching the correct answer, they continue generating redundant reasoning steps. This behavior increases latency and compute cost and can also lead to answer drift. Existing mitigation methods either require training-heavy backbone modification or rely on hand-crafted heuristics that do not truly capture overthinking patterns. We propose ROM, the first method that formulates overthinking mitigation as a streaming prediction-and-control problem. ROM attaches a lightweight detection head to the late-layer hidden states of a frozen large language model backbone. It monitors tokens in real time and triggers an early transition to the final answer once overthinking is detected. We also introduce token-level supervision based on solution correctness boundaries and a data augmentation strategy that reduces distilled-data bias. Across seven benchmarks, ROM achieves the highest accuracy (93.51%), the shortest responses (1,159 tokens), and the best response efficiency. Compared with the vanilla baseline, it reduces response length by 47.2% and improves efficiency by 121%. These results show that streaming detection is a promising approach to real-time overthinking mitigation.
0
cs.HCcs.AIcs.CL David M. Markowitz · Mar 23, 2026

Dyadic is a web-based platform for studying human-human and human-AI conversations through text or voice-based interaction. It attempts to solve the methodological gap in conversation research by providing turnkey tools for experimental manipulation, live monitoring, and in-situ survey delivery during ongoing chats. The core value proposition is lowering barriers to entry for researchers studying dyadic interaction processes without requiring programming expertise.

Conversation is ubiquitous in social life, but the empirical study of this interactive process has been thwarted by tools that are insufficiently modular and unadaptive to researcher needs. To relieve many constraints in conversation research, the current tutorial presents an overview and introduction to a new tool, Dyadic (https://www.chatdyadic.com/), a web-based platform for studying human-human and human-AI conversations using text-based or voice-based chats. Dyadic is distinct from other platforms by offering studies with multiple modalities, AI suggestions (e.g., in human-human studies, AI can suggest responses to a participant), live monitoring (e.g., researchers can evaluate, in real time, chats between communicators), and survey deployment (e.g., Likert-type scales, feeling thermometers, and open-ended text boxes can be sent to humans for in situ evaluations of the interaction), among other consequential features. No coding is required to operate Dyadic directly, and integrations with existing survey platforms are offered.
0
cs.LGcs.CL Florent Draye, Abir Harrasse, Vedant Palit et al. · Mar 22, 2026

Cross-Layer Transcoders (CLTs) compress the attribution graphs used in mechanistic interpretability by sharing features across transformer layers, but their quadratic parameter scaling ($N_{\text{CLT}} \propto L^2$) makes training and analysis prohibitively expensive for most researchers. This paper introduces CLT-Forge, an open-source library that combines feature-sharded distributed training, compressed activation caching (int8/int4/int2 with zstd), automated interpretability pipelines, and integration with Circuit-Tracer to provide the first unified workflow for end-to-end CLT analysis at scale.

Mechanistic interpretability seeks to understand how Large Language Models (LLMs) represent and process information. Recent approaches based on dictionary learning and transcoders enable representing model computation in terms of sparse, interpretable features and their interactions, giving rise to feature attribution graphs. However, these graphs are often large and redundant, limiting their interpretability in practice. Cross-Layer Transcoders (CLTs) address this issue by sharing features across layers while preserving layer-specific decoding, yielding more compact representations, but remain difficult to train and analyze at scale. We introduce an open-source library for end-to-end training and interpretability of CLTs. Our framework integrates scalable distributed training with model sharding and compressed activation caching, a unified automated interpretability pipeline for feature analysis and explanation, attribution graph computation using Circuit-Tracer, and a flexible visualization interface. This provides a practical and unified solution for scaling CLT-based mechanistic interpretability. Our code is available at: https://github.com/LLM-Interp/CLT-Forge.
0
cs.CVcs.AIcs.CL Umair Nawaz, Ahmed Heakl, Ufaq Khan et al. · Mar 23, 2026

WorldCache addresses the prohibitive latency of Diffusion Transformers (DiTs) for video world models by replacing static feature caching with a content-aware dynamical approximation framework. The method introduces motion-adaptive thresholds, saliency-weighted drift estimation, and optimal feature blending to eliminate ghosting artifacts during fast motion. Achieving 2.3× speedup on Cosmos-Predict2.5 with 99.4% quality retention, it offers a training-free path toward interactive world simulation.

Diffusion Transformers (DiTs) power high-fidelity video world models but remain computationally expensive due to sequential denoising and costly spatio-temporal attention. Training-free feature caching accelerates inference by reusing intermediate activations across denoising steps; however, existing methods largely rely on a Zero-Order Hold assumption i.e., reusing cached features as static snapshots when global drift is small. This often leads to ghosting artifacts, blur, and motion inconsistencies in dynamic scenes. We propose \textbf{WorldCache}, a Perception-Constrained Dynamical Caching framework that improves both when and how to reuse features. WorldCache introduces motion-adaptive thresholds, saliency-weighted drift estimation, optimal approximation via blending and warping, and phase-aware threshold scheduling across diffusion steps. Our cohesive approach enables adaptive, motion-consistent feature reuse without retraining. On Cosmos-Predict2.5-2B evaluated on PAI-Bench, WorldCache achieves \textbf{2.3$\times$} inference speedup while preserving \textbf{99.4\%} of baseline quality, substantially outperforming prior training-free caching approaches. Our code can be accessed on \href{https://umair1221.github.io/World-Cache/}{World-Cache}.
0
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL Kexian Tang, Jiani Wang, Shaowen Wang et al. · Mar 23, 2026

Large language models often lack coverage in specialized, data-scarce domains where web text is limited. This paper proposes SPA (Scaling Prompt-engineered Augmentation), a baseline that generates large-scale synthetic corpora using just seven carefully designed prompt templates grounded in cognitive learning strategies (Concept Learning, Critical Thinking, and Generative Learning). The core finding is that this simple approach consistently outperforms complex RL-based methods like SEAL and multi-stage pipelines like EntiGraph across Wikipedia QA, long-document comprehension, and multi-hop reasoning benchmarks, suggesting that careful prompt design combined with straightforward scaling is surprisingly effective for knowledge injection.

While large language models (LLMs) are pretrained on massive amounts of data, their knowledge coverage remains incomplete in specialized, data-scarce domains, motivating extensive efforts to study synthetic data generation for knowledge injection. We propose SPA (Scaling Prompt-engineered Augmentation), a simple but tough-to-beat baseline that uses a small set of carefully designed prompts to generate large-scale synthetic data for knowledge injection. Through systematic comparisons, we find that SPA outperforms several strong baselines. Furthermore, we identify two key limitations of prior approaches: (1) while RL-based methods may improve the token efficiency of LLM-based data augmentation at small scale, they suffer from diversity collapse as data scales, leading to diminishing returns; and (2) while multi-stage prompting may outperform simple augmentation methods, their advantages can disappear after careful prompt tuning. Our results suggest that, for knowledge injection, careful prompt design combined with straightforward large-scale augmentation can be surprisingly effective, and we hope SPA can serve as a strong baseline for future studies in this area. Our code is available at https://github.com/Tangkexian/SPA.
0
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL Hung-Hsuan Chen · Mar 23, 2026

Standard Transformers apply fixed-depth computation regardless of problem difficulty, limiting their ability to solve tasks requiring variable-depth reasoning like multi-hop traversal or nested logic. This paper proposes a depth-recurrent Transformer that iteratively applies a shared-weight block in latent space—enabling 'vertical Chain-of-Thought' where models trade recurrence steps for deeper reasoning without consuming context window. The work demonstrates strong compositional generalization on three synthetic tasks and offers a mechanistic alternative to horizontal token-generation paradigms.

Standard Transformers have a fixed computational depth, fundamentally limiting their ability to generalize to tasks requiring variable-depth reasoning, such as multi-hop graph traversal or nested logic. We propose a depth-recurrent Transformer that decouples computational depth from parameter count by iteratively applying a shared-weight Transformer block in latent space -- enabling the model to trade recurrence steps for deeper reasoning at inference time. Our architecture incorporates three mechanisms to make deep recurrence (20+ steps) stable: (1) a silent thinking objective that supervises only the final output, forcing genuine multi-step reasoning rather than intermediate heuristic shortcuts; (2) LayerScale initialization to protect fragile reasoning states from untrained layer noise; and (3) an identity-biased recurrence that creates a gradient highway across many steps. We evaluate on three compositional reasoning domains with decreasing inductive biases: graph reachability (strict adjacency masking), nested boolean logic (relative positioning), and unstructured relational text (where sequence position provides no structural hints). Across all tasks, we observe a clear \emph{computational frontier} -- a boundary where performance transitions from chance to near-perfect as thinking steps scale with task complexity. Moreover, these tasks reveal qualitatively different generalization behaviors: precise but brittle (graph), approximate but robust (logic), and autonomous latent routing without structural hints (text). This progression illuminates how the interplay between a task-invariant recurrent reasoning core and task-specific perceptual interfaces shapes out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization, offering a mechanistic perspective on vertical chain-of-thought that complements the prevailing horizontal token-generation paradigm.
0
physics.opticscs.AIcs.AR Hyoseok Park, Yeonsang Park · Mar 23, 2026

Long-context LLM inference hits a memory wall: each decode step requires scanning the entire KV cache, incurring $O(n)$ memory bandwidth that cannot be solved by faster arithmetic. PRISM proposes a thin-film lithium niobate photonic accelerator that performs the block-selection similarity search in $O(1)$ optical latency using a broadcast-and-weight architecture, eliminating the $O(n)$ scan entirely. The work claims $16\times$–$32\times$ traffic reduction at 64K–128K tokens and a four-order-of-magnitude energy advantage over GPU baselines by matching photonic hardware capabilities—passive query broadcast, quasi-static microring weights, and low-precision rank output—to the selection task.

Long-context LLM inference is bottlenecked not by compute but by the O(n) memory bandwidth cost of scanning the KV cache at every decode step -- a wall that no amount of arithmetic scaling can break. Recent photonic accelerators have demonstrated impressive throughput for dense attention computation; however, these approaches inherit the same O(n) memory scaling as electronic attention when applied to long contexts. We observe that the real leverage point is the coarse block-selection step: a memory-bound similarity search that determines which KV blocks to fetch. We identify, for the first time, that this task is structurally matched to the photonic broadcast-and-weight paradigm -- the query fans out to all candidates via passive splitting, signatures are quasi-static (matching electro-optic MRR programming), and only rank order matters (relaxing precision to 4-6 bits). Crucially, the photonic advantage grows with context length: as N increases, the electronic scan cost rises linearly while the photonic evaluation remains O(1). We instantiate this insight in PRISM (Photonic Ranking via Inner-product Similarity with Microring weights), a thin-film lithium niobate (TFLN) similarity engine. Hardware-impaired needle-in-a-haystack evaluation on Qwen2.5-7B confirms 100% accuracy from 4K through 64K tokens at k=32, with 16x traffic reduction at 64K context. PRISM achieves a four-order-of-magnitude energy advantage over GPU baselines at practical context lengths (n >= 4K).
0
cs.AIcs.CL Yiling Wu · Mar 23, 2026

This paper examines representation genesis—the transition from non-representational physical systems to those with content-manipulable states. It argues that major frameworks in philosophy of mind (Language of Thought, teleosemantics, predictive processing, enactivism, and genetic phenomenology) share a 'Representation Presupposition' structure that prevents them from explaining this first acquisition without circularity. With large language models now achieving high cognitive performance without clear genesis events, the absence of a satisfactory theory becomes urgent.

Large language models are the first systems to achieve high cognitive performance without clearly undergoing representation genesis: the transition from a non-representing physical system to one whose states guide behavior in a content-sensitive way. Prior cognitive systems had already made this transition before we could examine it, and philosophy of mind treated genesis as a background condition rather than an explanatory target. LLMs provide a case that does not clearly involve this transition, making the genesis question newly urgent: if genesis did not occur, which cognitive capacities are affected, and why? We currently lack the conceptual resources to answer this. The reason, this paper argues, is structural. Major frameworks in philosophy of mind, including the Language of Thought hypothesis, teleosemantics, predictive processing, enactivism, and genetic phenomenology, share a common feature when applied to the genesis question: at some explanatory step, each deploys concepts whose explanatory purchase depends on the system already being organized as a representer. This pattern, which we call the Representation Presupposition structure, generates systematic explanatory deferral. Attempts to explain the first acquisition of content-manipulable representation within the existing categorical vocabulary import resources from the representational side of the transition itself. We call this the Representation Regress. The paper offers a conceptual diagnosis rather than a new theory, establishing the structure of the problem and deriving two minimum adequacy conditions for any account that avoids this pattern. LLMs make the absence of such a theory consequential rather than merely theoretical.
0
cs.AIcs.CL Yiliang Song, Hongjun An, Jiangan Chen et al. · Mar 23, 2026

The paper critiques the institutionalization of LLM benchmarks as "Silicon Bureaucracy" and "AI Test-Oriented Education", arguing high scores often conflate exam-oriented competence with genuine generalization due to data contamination. It proposes an audit framework using a router-worker setup: clean-control routers transmit full questions while noisy routers delete, rewrite, and perturb before aggregation. For clean benchmarks, noisy aggregation should not systematically exceed the baseline; persistent above-baseline gains suggest contamination-related memory activation. The core finding—that 10 of 12 models exceed clean baselines under multi-router noisy conditions—challenges the interpretability of raw benchmark scores.

Public benchmarks increasingly govern how large language models (LLMs) are ranked, selected, and deployed. We frame this benchmark-centered regime as Silicon Bureaucracy and AI Test-Oriented Education, and argue that it rests on a fragile assumption: that benchmark scores directly reflect genuine generalization. In practice, however, such scores may conflate exam-oriented competence with principled capability, especially when contamination and semantic leakage are difficult to exclude from modern training pipelines. We therefore propose an audit framework for analyzing contamination sensitivity and score confidence in LLM benchmarks. Using a router-worker setup, we compare a clean-control condition with noisy conditions in which benchmark problems are systematically deleted, rewritten, and perturbed before being passed downstream. For a genuinely clean benchmark, noisy conditions should not consistently outperform the clean-control baseline. Yet across multiple models, we find widespread but heterogeneous above-baseline gains under noisy conditions, indicating that benchmark-related cues may be reassembled and can reactivate contamination-related memory. These results suggest that similar benchmark scores may carry substantially different levels of confidence. Rather than rejecting benchmarks altogether, we argue that benchmark-based evaluation should be supplemented with explicit audits of contamination sensitivity and score confidence.
0
cs.CLcs.AI Jiayi Geng, Graham Neubig · Mar 23, 2026

CAID tackles long-horizon software engineering tasks where single agents struggle with accuracy and wall-clock time. The core idea is Centralized Asynchronous Isolated Delegation: a manager decomposes tasks into dependency graphs and delegates to multiple engineer agents working in isolated git worktrees, integrating progress via branch-and-merge. The system improves accuracy by 26.7% absolute on PaperBench and 14.3% on Commit0, demonstrating that structured coordination grounded in SWE primitives outperforms simply scaling single-agent iteration budgets.

AI agents have become increasingly capable at isolated software engineering (SWE) tasks such as resolving issues on Github. Yet long-horizon tasks involving multiple interdependent subtasks still pose challenges both with respect to accuracy, and with respect to timely completion. A natural approach to solving these long-horizon tasks in a timely manner is asynchronous multi-agent collaboration, where multiple agents work on different parts of the task at the same time. But effective application of multi-agent systems has proven surprisingly difficult: concurrent edits by multiple agents interfere with each other, dependencies are difficult to synchronize, and combining partial progress into a coherent whole is challenging. On the other hand, human developers have long relied on mature collaboration infrastructure to manage these challenges in large software projects. Inspired by these collaboration primitives, we introduce Centralized Asynchronous Isolated Delegation (CAID), a structured multi-agent coordination paradigm grounded in three core SWE primitives: centralized task delegation, asynchronous execution, and isolated workspaces. CAID constructs dependency-aware task plans through a central manager, executes subtasks concurrently in isolated workspaces, and consolidates progress via structured integration with executable test-based verification. In empirical evaluation, we find that CAID improves accuracy over single-agent baselines by 26.7% absolute on paper reproduction tasks (PaperBench) and 14.3% on Python library development tasks (Commit0). Through systematic analysis, we find that branch-and-merge is a central coordination mechanism for multi-agent collaboration, and that SWE primitives such as git worktree, git commit, and git merge enable it to be realized in a reliable and executable manner.
0
cs.AIcs.CL Liang Ding · Mar 22, 2026

AdaRubric solves the static-rubric bottleneck in LLM-as-Judge evaluation by dynamically generating task-specific evaluation dimensions from task descriptions. It scores agent trajectories step-by-step with confidence-weighted per-dimension feedback and filters preference pairs using the DimensionAwareFilter—a provably necessary mechanism to prevent high-scoring dimensions from masking failures. The approach achieves Pearson $r=0.79$ correlation with human judgments and yields substantial downstream gains: +6.8–8.5 percentage points in DPO task success and +6.6 pp faster PPO convergence at 5K steps.

LLM-as-Judge evaluation fails agent tasks because a fixed rubric cannot capture what matters for this task: code debugging demands Correctness and Error Handling; web navigation demands Goal Alignment and Action Efficiency. We present ADARUBRIC, which closes this gap by generating task-specific evaluation rubrics on the fly from task descriptions, scoring trajectories step-by-step with confidence-weighted per-dimension feedback, and filtering preference pairs with the novel DimensionAwareFilter - a provably necessary condition for preventing high-scoring dimensions from masking dimension-level failures. On WebArena and ToolBench, ADARUBRIC achieves Pearson r=0.79 human correlation (+0.16 over the best static baseline) with deployment-grade reliability (Krippendorff's $\alpha$=0.83). DPO agents trained on ADARUBRIC preference pairs gain +6.8 to +8.5 pp task success over Prometheus across three benchmarks; gains transfer to SWE-bench code repair (+4.9 pp) and accelerate PPO convergence by +6.6 pp at 5K steps - both without any rubric engineering. Code: https://github.com/alphadl/AdaRubrics.
0
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG Mariela M. Nina, Caio Veloso Costa, Lilian Berton et al. · Mar 22, 2026

This paper addresses computational barriers for Brazilian Portuguese question answering by systematically evaluating Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods on BERTimbau models using the SQuAD-BR dataset. The authors test LoRA, DoRA, QLoRA, and QDoRA across Base (110M) and Large (335M) variants, demonstrating that LoRA achieves 95.8% of full fine-tuning performance while reducing training time by 73.5%. A key finding is that PEFT methods require substantially higher learning rates ($2\times 10^{-4}$) than standard BERT fine-tuning to achieve optimal results, with quantization resilience favoring larger models.

Although large language models have transformed natural language processing, their computational costs create accessibility barriers for low-resource languages such as Brazilian Portuguese. This work presents a systematic evaluation of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) and quantization techniques applied to BERTimbau for Question Answering on SQuAD-BR, the Brazilian Portuguese translation of SQuAD v1. We evaluate 40 configurations combining four PEFT methods (LoRA, DoRA, QLoRA, QDoRA) across two model sizes (Base: 110M, Large: 335M parameters). Our findings reveal three critical insights: (1) LoRA achieves 95.8\% of baseline performance on BERTimbau-Large while reducing training time by 73.5\% (F1=81.32 vs 84.86); (2) higher learning rates (2e-4) substantially improve PEFT performance, with F1 gains of up to +19.71 points over standard rates; and (3) larger models show twice the quantization resilience (loss of 4.83 vs 9.56 F1 points). These results demonstrate that encoder-based models can be efficiently fine-tuned for extractive Brazilian Portuguese QA with substantially lower computational cost than large generative LLMs, promoting more sustainable approaches aligned with \textit{Green AI} principles. An exploratory evaluation of Tucano and Sabi\'a on the same extractive QA benchmark shows that while generative models can reach competitive F1 scores with LoRA fine-tuning, they require up to 4.2$\times$ more GPU memory and 3$\times$ more training time than BERTimbau-Base, reinforcing the efficiency advantage of smaller encoder-based architectures for this task.
0
cs.CLcs.AIcs.CY K. M. Jubair Sami, Dipto Sumit, Ariyan Hossain et al. · Mar 22, 2026

This paper tackles the problem of measuring dialectal bias in LLMs for Bengali, a low-resource language with nine major regional variants. The authors propose a two-phase framework combining RAG-based translation to create dialectal benchmarks with an RLAIF-inspired evaluation protocol that uses CoT-first reasoning and multi-judge validation. They expose the catastrophic failure of traditional metrics like BLEU and WER for agglutinative dialectal Bengali, showing that LLM-as-judge better predicts human quality assessments.

Large language models (LLMs) frequently exhibit performance biases against regional dialects of low-resource languages. However, frameworks to quantify these disparities remain scarce. We propose a two-phase framework to evaluate dialectal bias in LLM question-answering across nine Bengali dialects. First, we translate and gold-label standard Bengali questions into dialectal variants adopting a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipeline to prepare 4,000 question sets. Since traditional translation quality evaluation metrics fail on unstandardized dialects, we evaluate fidelity using an LLM-as-a-judge, which human correlation confirms outperforms legacy metrics. Second, we benchmark 19 LLMs across these gold-labeled sets, running 68,395 RLAIF evaluations validated through multi-judge agreement and human fallback. Our findings reveal severe performance drops linked to linguistic divergence. For instance, responses to the highly divergent Chittagong dialect score 5.44/10, compared to 7.68/10 for Tangail. Furthermore, increased model scale does not consistently mitigate this bias. We contribute a validated translation quality evaluation method, a rigorous benchmark dataset, and a Critical Bias Sensitivity (CBS) metric for safety-critical applications.
0
cs.CLcs.AI Ravi Ranjan, Utkarsh Grover, Mayur Akewar et al. · Mar 23, 2026

Large Language Models often inherit societal biases that manifest as stereotyped associations across demographic groups. This paper proposes CatRAG, a dual-mechanism debiasing framework that combines a category-theoretic functor-guided projection—collapsing protected-attribute directions in embedding space via spectral decomposition—with diversity-aware Retrieval-Augmented Generation to ground inference in balanced evidence. Evaluated on the BBQ benchmark across Llama-3, GPT-OSS, and Gemma-3, the method claims to reduce bias scores from ~60% to near zero while improving accuracy by up to 40% over base models.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are deployed in high-stakes settings but can show demographic, gender, and geographic biases that undermine fairness and trust. Prior debiasing methods, including embedding-space projections, prompt-based steering, and causal interventions, often act at a single stage of the pipeline, resulting in incomplete mitigation and brittle utility trade-offs under distribution shifts. We propose CatRAG Debiasing, a dual-pronged framework that integrates functor with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) guided structural debiasing. The functor component leverages category-theoretic structure to induce a principled, structure-preserving projection that suppresses bias-associated directions in the embedding space while retaining task-relevant semantics. On the Bias Benchmark for Question Answering (BBQ) across three open-source LLMs (Meta Llama-3, OpenAI GPT-OSS, and Google Gemma-3), CatRAG achieves state-of-the-art results, improving accuracy by up to 40% over the corresponding base models and by more than 10% over prior debiasing methods, while reducing bias scores to near zero (from 60% for the base models) across gender, nationality, race, and intersectional subgroups.
0
cs.AIcs.CL Liang Ding · Mar 22, 2026

AgentHER tackles the data waste problem in LLM agent training by adapting Hindsight Experience Replay (HER) from RL to natural-language trajectories. The core insight is that failed trajectories—typically 60–75% of collected data—often represent valid demonstrations for achievable alternative goals. The paper proposes a four-stage pipeline with multi-judge verification that converts discarded failures into SFT and DPO training data, yielding +7.1–11.7 pp gains over success-only fine-tuning across four model families on WebArena and ToolBench.

LLM agents fail on the majority of real-world tasks -- GPT-4o succeeds on fewer than 15% of WebArena navigation tasks and below 55% pass@1 on ToolBench (Zhou et al., 2024; Qin et al., 2024) -- yet every failed trajectory is routinely discarded, wasting the dominant source of collected experience. We introduce AgentHER, a framework that recovers this lost training signal by adapting the Hindsight Experience Replay (HER; Andrychowicz et al., 2017) principle to natural-language agent trajectories for offline data augmentation. The key insight is simple: a trajectory that fails goal A is often a correct demonstration for some achievable alternative goal B. AgentHER realises this idea through a four-stage pipeline -- failure classification, outcome extraction, LLM-guided prompt relabeling with confidence gating, and data packaging -- that converts discarded failures into high-quality SFT, DPO, and ShareGPT training data, with both zero-cost rule-based and LLM-judge implementations. On WebArena (Zhou et al., 2024) and ToolBench (Qin et al., 2024), AgentHER improves over success-only SFT by +7.1-11.7 pp across four model families (GPT-4o, Qwen2.5-72B/7B, LLaMA-3.1-8B), while achieving 2x data efficiency -- matching baseline performance with only 50% of successful demonstrations. Gains are consistent from 1.5B to 72B parameters (+5.8-9.2 pp) and compound under iterative redeployment (+2.1 pp over additional rounds). Human evaluation confirms 97.7% relabeling precision under multi-judge verification.