Your paper timeline
Scroll AI takes the way you would scroll a great paper aggregator: quick signal first, deeper critique when something earns your attention, and challenges when a claim feels off.
698 papers in cs.AI
Trending mixes fresh papers with community signal.
0
cs.AI Jingyuan Li, Dongzhan Zhou, Minting Pan et al. · Oct 14, 2026

LabCompiler targets the translation of imperfect natural-language laboratory protocols into verifiable, executable human-machine workflows. The framework introduces a staged "diagnose-represent-execute" architecture: a protocol firewall repairs defects before compilation, a two-level device-agnostic graph separates experimental intent from hardware details, and a capability-grounded router assigns actions to automated devices or human operators. Reliable protocol execution across heterogeneous, partially automated labs is essential for closing the loop in AI-driven science.

Closing the loop of AI-driven science requires reliably translating natural-language protocols into executable laboratory workflows despite protocol defects and heterogeneous hardware. Existing approaches often couple scientific interpretation with device-specific code generation, making errors difficult to localize and limiting reuse across laboratory platforms. We introduce LabCompiler, a robust protocol-to-execution framework that transforms imperfect natural-language protocols into verifiable human-machine workflows. Its protocol firewall diagnoses and repairs defects before compilation while preserving unaffected content, guided by troubleshooting knowledge accumulated through perturbation-guided self-evolution. A two-level, device-agnostic graph representation separates experimental semantics from hardware-specific implementation and supports capability-based device assignment with coordinated human execution. We further introduce a protocol recovery benchmark covering four controlled perturbation types and naturally occurring errors collected from protocols written by iGEM participants. Experiments show that LabCompiler outperforms frontier LLMs in protocol error correction while enabling coordinated human-machine execution across heterogeneous, partially automated laboratory settings.
0
cs.CLcs.AIcs.HC Yilin Jiang, Fei Tan, Xuanyu Yin et al. · Oct 14, 2026

This paper tackles the problem that LLM agents often return replies which a human requester cannot interpret because they rely on private working context unseen by the user. The authors define reply usability as the ability of a requester to understand and act on a reply from only what they have seen ($R$), and measure it with an LLM-based reader model that flags information gaps. Across eight current models, 54% of 480 replies fail, with even the best model failing 30% of the time. They show that appending explicit requirements or rewriting with a secondary model substantially lowers failures, making usability an actionable target for agent design.

People delegate multi-step work to LLM agents and read only the reply that the agent hands back. Current evaluation scores task completion and the faithfulness of reports, and it leaves open whether the requester can understand and use the reply. We call this property reply usability and measure it with a reader model that takes the requester's position and tests whether the reply can be interpreted from what the requester has seen, is in the requester's language and answers the request. Its agreement with the majority of five annotators lies within the range of the individual annotators. Across eight models from seven families, 54% of 480 replies fail, and the best model still fails on 30%. Failed replies mostly point to material the requester has not seen or use labels that the agent coined during its work. Stating explicit requirements for the reply reduces the failure rate from 0.52 to 0.43 together with errors and omissions, and a secondary model that rewrites the reply reduces it to 0.36, which human annotators confirm in a blind comparison. Reply usability can thus be scored alongside task success and improved with one appended message or one call to a secondary model.
0
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG Baowen Zhang, Hangting Ye, Hongyuan Zha · Oct 14, 2026

Typed decision models return probabilities over fixed answer choices instead of generating free text, making them a natural fit for tabular prediction tasks. This paper evaluates four such models against three large language models on row classification, fact verification, and anomaly detection, subjecting every request to 21 content-preserving rewrites. The authors find that decision models match LLM accuracy at far lower cost and are far more robust to how questions are phrased, yet no model escapes fragility when the table layout is altered.

Typed decision models are language models that answer a question with a fixed set of possible answers by returning a probability for each answer instead of generating text. We study them on tabular data and compare four decision models with three large language models (LLMs) on row classification, fact verification and anomaly detection. Every request is sent in its original form and under 21 types of rewrite that keep its content, such as renaming the options or writing the table in another format. The decision models perform as well as the LLMs at a lower cost. Three of them are also far more robust to how the question is formulated. No model we test is robust to how the table is organized. For every model, at least a third of the row decisions change under some rewrite of the table or the question. The decisions to which a decision model gives low probability are the ones most likely to change. Decision models are a practical choice for tabular decisions, but their robustness remains an open problem.
0
cs.CLcs.AIcs.CY Yilin Jiang, Fei Tan, Xuanyu Yin et al. · Oct 14, 2026

Simulated students let developers test tutoring systems before real learners are available, but LLM role-play suffers from competence leakage because the model substitutes its own knowledge for the learner's. HACHIMI-II counters this by recasting simulation as third-person prediction: it builds a student model, infers a fine-grained learner state for each step, and compiles that state into a deterministic behavior harness that constrains generation. On five datasets, this cuts the ability-distribution gap by 2.4–8.4× and more than doubles error-structure fidelity over the strongest baseline.

Simulated students let researchers test tutoring systems and teaching strategies before real learners are available, but only if the simulation reproduces where a particular learner succeeds and fails. The common approach asks a large language model to role-play a student, but a role does not model what this learner knows or will do next, so the model's own competence fills the gap. Simulated students perform at a level set by the model, differ little from one another, and seldom make the real learners' errors. We model the learner's behavior and recast student simulation as third-person prediction of the learner's next action. HACHIMI-II builds a student model from the learner's history, infers the learner's state for the current item or tutor turn, and compiles it into a behavior harness that constrains the next action. On three item-response datasets, the Wasserstein-1 distance between simulated and real student ability is 2.4--8.4$\times$ smaller than that of the strongest baseline. On two dialogue datasets, HACHIMI-II reproduces real student errors with the same knowledge type, locus, and mechanism 1.8--5.1$\times$ more often than the strongest baseline, and ablations trace the gains mainly to the explicit learner state. Predicting the learner makes capable models usable as simulated students.
0
cs.LGcs.AI Xinjie Lan, Yunbo Mei, Leheng Zhou et al. · Oct 14, 2026

This paper tackles non-stationarity in long-term time series forecasting by asking how positional encoding shapes temporal dependencies in Transformer attention. The core idea is to reinterpret self-attention as a Bayesian posterior in which positional encoding acts as latent temporal evidence, and to replace static positional biases with an input-conditioned mixture-of-experts router that adaptively combines local and periodic kernels. The results matter because they offer a principled, lightweight, plug-and-play module that consistently improves forecasting across four diverse Transformer backbones.

Transformers have demonstrated strong performance in long-term time series forecasting (LTSF), yet modeling non-stationary temporal dependencies remains challenging. In this paper, we interpret self-attention as a Bayesian posterior over attended positions, combining a content-based prior induced by scaled dot-product similarity with a temporal-evidence likelihood induced by positional encoding. This formulation provides a probabilistic interpretation of how positional encoding shapes the temporal dependencies captured by self-attention. Building on this perspective, we derive a population-level evidence lower bound (ELBO) that characterizes the role of positional encoding in forecasting weakly stationary time series. Our analysis further highlights a limitation of static positional encoding: when temporal dependence structures vary across input windows, a fixed temporal bias must accommodate heterogeneous dynamics and can therefore be suboptimal for non-stationary forecasting. Motivated by this analysis, we propose Bayesian Time-aware Attention (BTA), which employs a mixture-of-experts (MoE) router to adaptively combine temporal kernels and generate input-conditioned, head-specific positional biases. Extensive experiments on standard LTSF benchmarks demonstrate that BTA consistently improves forecasting performance across multiple Transformer backbones and achieves competitive overall performance with modest computational overhead and stable training.
0
cs.CLcs.AIcs.IR Shijun Li, Yang Liu, Najmeh Sadoughi et al. · Oct 14, 2026

Existing retrieval-augmented MT applies retrieval uniformly, yet LLM parametric knowledge suffices for many inputs and external evidence is only conditionally useful. This paper proposes SRAT, an agentic RL framework that treats reasoning, retrieval, and translation as learnable actions optimized via GRPO for final translation quality. It learns when to retrieve, what to query, and how to integrate evidence, supported by two retriever-alignment strategies and evaluated across idiom, knowledge-intensive, and document-level settings. The work is important because it challenges the default assumption that retrieval is always beneficial and shows that adaptive, quality-aligned evidence acquisition consistently outperforms fixed pipelines.

Retrieving external knowledge can improve large language model (LLM) translation by providing supplementary information such as idiom interpretations and terminology. However, existing retrieval-augmented machine translation systems typically apply predefined retrieval strategies uniformly across all inputs. We argue that translation operates in a partial-evidence regime: LLM's parametric knowledge suffices for many inputs, while external evidence benefits a subset and usually supports rather than directly provides the desired translation. This creates two challenges: deciding when to retrieve and what evidence to acquire. We introduce Selective Retrieval-Augmented Translation (SRAT), an agentic reinforcement learning framework that learns when to translate directly or retrieve, what to retrieve, and how to integrate these decisions by optimizing final translation quality. To align evidence retrieval with downstream translation quality rather than simple semantic similarity, we further develop joint Plackett--Luce optimization and translation-quality contrastive training for retriever-training. Experiments on idiom, knowledge-intensive, and document-level translation with offline or online retrieval show that SRAT consistently outperforms never- and always-retrieve baselines, and quality-aligned retriever training provides further gains when similarity-based retrieval is insufficient. The results demonstrate the benefit of treating retrieval as a learnable translation action rather than fixed preprocessing.
0
cs.AI Chaoyang Zhu, Zhe Liao, Jiayi Zhang et al. · Oct 14, 2026

This paper challenges the dominant triplet contrastive learning pipeline for 3D shape understanding, which aligns 3D point clouds with rendered images and text. The authors argue that rendered images are unreliable due to domain shift, self-occlusion, and rendering artifacts, and propose learning from language supervision only. Their core idea, HyperCL, embeds 3D shapes and text into hyperbolic space via the Lorentz model, using a geodesic-based contrastive loss and a batch-wise entailment loss that enforces the partial-order relation $\text{caption}\,\text{entails}\,\text{3D}\,\text{shape}$. They also introduce c-OLVIS, a manually cleaned subset of Objaverse-LVIS, for more rigorous evaluation. The work matters because it questions a multi-modal pre-training assumption and reports state-of-the-art zero-shot classification and retrieval under a smaller parameter budget.

In multi-modal 3D pre-training, aligning 3D shapes, their 2D image counterparts, and language descriptions has made tremendous progress. However, we find that supervision from rendered images is unreliable, the semantics encoded in synthetic views are distorted due to domain gap, self-occlusion, and rendering artifacts. Instead, we learn transferable 3D representations from language only. We observe that, in real world, 3D shapes are organized in a tree-like structure, ranging from general concepts to fine-grained instances with specific attributes, while language typically denotes generic concepts and subsumes these various 3D instantiations. Hence, we propose to embed 3D representations in hyperbolic space, whose geometry is well-suited for modeling tree-like data without distortion. To capture the asymmetric hierarchy between language and 3D shapes, we further impose a partial-order relation that language entails 3D shapes. Our method, Hyperbolic Contrastive Learning (HyperCL), jointly optimizes a hyperbolic geodesic-based contrastive objective and an entailment loss to learn discriminative cross-modal representations while explicitly preserving this hierarchy. We also introduce a rigorously verified benchmark for comprehensively evaluating cross-modal 3D alignment. Across two widely used benchmarks and ours, we improve the performance up to 4.6% absolute percentage on 3D shape classification and 5.5% on cross-modal text-to-3D retrieval under the same parameter budget. The code and evaluation benchmark will be made publicly available.
0
cs.AI Zerui Yang, Quan Xue, Chaorui Zhang et al. · Oct 14, 2026

This paper tackles questions about an agent's history that require aggregating multiple events, a task that pure retrieval cannot solve. It proposes Trajectory Memory (TM) for deferred, source-preserving evidence selection, and TallyMem for executable event aggregation via a typed query language over a reusable ledger. The core insight is that aggregation load—the number of events an answer must combine—predicts failure better than raw history length, with strong controlled evidence (+11.0 to +13.8 points) supporting the mechanism, though full-benchmark gains are more modest.

Questions about an agent's history often require aggregating events, which retrieval alone does not resolve. We combine source-preserving evidence access with executable aggregation. Trajectory Memory (TM) retains the original trajectory and constructs a source-addressable reading view at question time. TallyMem augments it with a reusable event ledger, model-generated event specifications and deterministic execution. With a commit-specific adaptation on 776 questions from 99 held-out MINTEval repositories, TallyMem raises Qwen3-32B exact match from 35.2% to 49.0%, a 13.8-point gain over TM; gains span 12.8-13.9 points across three readers. A controlled probe with event sets parsed independently from raw logs shows an 11.0-point gain, from 82.8% to 93.8%, without routing. On full AMA-Bench, the routed system yields a smaller 1.3-point gain, from 69.8% to 71.1%. These results support executable aggregation on tasks that require combining events, with benefits dependent on the task and event specification, the largest residual system-error category in our diagnostic analysis.
0
cs.AIcs.RO Diyuan Shi, Yiqi Tang, Hongyin Zhang et al. · Oct 14, 2026

Vision-language-action models enable instruction-conditioned robot manipulation, but they typically cannot improve from experience after deployment. This paper proposes VLRLA, a framework that equips frozen VLA models with in-context reinforcement learning by conditioning action generation on a recurrent memory of past observations, actions, rewards, and termination signals. Using algorithm distillation on constructed learning histories, VLRLA aims to gradually improve task success during deployment without updating network parameters.

Vision-language-action (VLA) models connect visual perception and language understanding with robot control, providing a foundation for instruction-conditioned manipulation. However, conventional pretrained VLA policies lack a mechanism for gradual adaptation through accumulated interaction experience during deployment. We therefore propose VLRLA, a general framework that equips existing VLA models with \textit{in-context reinforcement learning} capabilities for deployment-time adaptation. Our approach augments a VLA model with a reinforcement learning module that learns from historical observations, actions, rewards, and termination signals. During deployment, the policy gradually refines its action generation and progressively improves task success while keeping model parameters fixed. Our approach is also designed for general applicability and compatibility with diverse learning history construction strategies and model training pipelines. Finally, through extensive experiments, we systematically investigate the learning properties of VLRLA in simulation and demonstrate its ability to adapt to unseen scenarios during real-world deployment.
0
cs.SEcs.AI Jiahao Zhang, Yifan Zhang, Yu Huang · Oct 14, 2026

Coding agents consume substantial tokens as they repeatedly decide where to look, what to try, and when to stop during automated repair. This paper asks which of these decisions can be offloaded to a cheap probabilistic judge that answers fixed questions without generating explanations. The authors introduce JevCoder, a workflow built around the proprietary Jev judge to recommend initial code snippets, guide action types during repair, and trigger submission. On 400 SWE-bench tasks across three repair models, the system cuts repair-model token use by $21.6\%$–$50.6\%$ while raising observed repair rates.

A coding agent repeatedly makes decisions as it repairs code. These decisions shape repair trajectories and affect the token cost of successive model requests. We ask which repair decisions can be delegated to a low-cost probabilistic judge to reduce token use while maintaining repair quality. The judges answer questions with probabilities over predefined answers, without generating explanations. We evaluate judgment quality across repair stages and test how individual interventions change subsequent repair work. We compare these interventions with unguided repair, which uses no judge, and with the same workflow using the repair model itself as the judge. The benefit depends on the work an intervention changes, rather than the cost of the judgment alone. Based on these studies, we propose JevCoder, a workflow built around Jev, a low-cost probabilistic judge. It combines code-snippet recommendations with action-type guidance and uses judgments to determine when to submit. We evaluate three repair models, each on the same 400 tasks: 200 from SWE-bench Verified and 200 from SWE-Bench Pro Verified. Compared to unguided repair, JevCoder reduces mean repair-model token use by 21.6%-50.6%, with higher observed repair rates across all three models.
0
cs.AIq-bio.QM Ashish Acharya, Aman Al Amin, Hong Qin · Oct 14, 2026

This paper tackles the problem that agentic scientific workflows can finish without crashing yet still emit scientifically invalid results due to silent faults, stale inputs, or contaminated shared ancestors. The core idea is a directed acyclic graph harness that treats trust as a release decision: it enforces mandatory checks, contains failures to affected branches, and uses a fixed risk model plus optional validators to decide whether a deliverable may be released. Language-model agents operate inside this layer, choosing corrective actions and reviewing releases, but cannot override it. On two synthetic workflows with injected faults, the authors decompose which harness component supplies which property, finding that structure, not the LLM, drives reliability.

An agentic scientific workflow can run to completion and still release wrong results: a silent numerical error, a stale input, or a defect in a shared upstream step can contaminate several outputs while a sibling branch stays correct. We treat trust in such results as a release decision. A harness around the workflow's directed acyclic graph (DAG) decides which outputs may be used: it enforces mandatory checks, contains failures to the affected branch, recomputes from tracked versions, adds validators, and releases a result only if a risk model estimates its probability of being invalid as low. Language-model agents work inside the harness, choosing corrective actions and reviewing releases, but cannot override it. On 60 held-out paired instances of two workflows with injected faults, we switched components on and off. Each supplied a different property. Containment and recovery raised the number of correct results. Validation supplied safety: fixed rules without validation released 37 invalid results, while validating every candidate released none. Risk estimation supplied efficiency, matching that safety with 31% fewer validators at somewhat lower yield, although better targeting than random validation was not shown. Lineage evidence helped on one workflow. The language model added no measurable benefit: whether invalid results escaped depended on the harness, not the model. This proof of concept points to a practical path: placing agents inside explicit release-control structure can keep released scientific results trustworthy, and it gives more capable agents a measurable baseline to improve on.
0
cs.AI Xin Li, Liang Hu, Duoqian Miao et al. · Oct 14, 2026

MemCode targets the long-term memory bottleneck in LLM agents by arguing that standard continuous vector retrieval misses logically related but lexically distant facts. It proposes retrieval-oriented atomic memory units (AMUs) and indexes them with a learned discrete codebook via isomorphic semantic quantization (ISQ), enabling dual-path retrieval that combines dense vectors with associative codebook topology. On LongMemEval-S and LoCoMo, it reports the best overall accuracy and a construction runtime roughly $3\sim21\times$ faster than strong baselines.

Long-term memory remains a fundamental bottleneck for large language model (LLM) agents across sessions. Existing systems typically adopt a write-then-retrieve paradigm, storing context-dependent dialogue fragments and retrieving them via nearest-neighbor search in a continuous embedding space. This design yields unstable access units and systematically misses logically related but lexically distant evidence. We propose MemCode, a long-term agent memory framework that couples retrieval-oriented writing with discrete associative retrieval. MemCode rewrites dialogue into self-contained atomic memory units (AMUs), maps AMUs into a learnable codebook with isomorphic semantic quantization (ISQ), and uses codebook co-occurrence topology as a retrieval path complementary to vector search. For long-term memory stores, MemCode separates online atomic writes from asynchronous offline consolidation. On LongMemEval-S and LoCoMo with GPT-4o-mini and Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 backbones, MemCode achieves the best overall accuracy while keeping per-dialogue memory construction within roughly 40~130 seconds, making it 3~21 times faster than LightMem and over an order of magnitude faster than A-MEM and MemoryOS.
0
cs.CLcs.AI Ruilin Shang, Shilong Hou, Zi Long et al. · Oct 14, 2026

Data augmentation for document-level NLP risks breaking inter-sentential coherence and invalidating sentence-aligned labels. This paper proposes an LLM-driven discourse parsing framework that preserves sentence order, count, and rhetorical relations $R_{i,j}$ while replacing key phrases $\mathbf{K}_i$ to generate augmented documents $\mathbf{D}'$. By keeping the $n$-sentence structure fixed, labels such as summary indices or QA spans can be transferred without expensive LLM relabeling.

Data augmentation (DA) plays a vital role in improving model performance in low-resource or limited-supervision scenarios within Natural Language Processing (NLP). Existing DA methods, such as synonym replacement and back-translation, have demonstrated effectiveness on the word or sentence level; however, they frequently neglect discourse-level coherence and logical flow, which are essential for complex tasks dependent on inter-sentential relationships. In this paper, we propose a structure-preserving document-level data augmentation framework based on large language models (LLMs) and document-level discourse structure parsing. Our approach identifies rhetorical relations between sentence pairs and extracts key phrases, which are then replaced with semantically coherent but topically shifted content while preserving the original discourse structure. Experimental results on text summarization and question answering show that the proposed augmented data provides complementary supervision and improves combined-data training across the evaluated tasks. Comparisons with a standard RST parser and controlled ablations further support the proposed discourse representation.
0
cs.CLcs.AI Yi Ding, Mengyu Wang, Min Zhou et al. · Oct 14, 2026

Language models frequently derail on multi-step reasoning because a single early error propagates through the rest of the generation. REWIND attacks this by treating token-level entropy as a diagnostic: it traces backward from high-entropy peaks to the sharpest local gradient jumps, uses those positions as cut points for suffix regeneration, and filters proposals with a likelihood-based acceptance rule. The result is a targeted, test-time repair loop that requires no fine-tuning or external verifier and that the authors show improves accuracy across multiple model families and reasoning benchmarks.

An early mistake in the generated reasoning can constrain all subsequent reasoning. Repeated-generation methods, like MCMC-based approaches, attempt to improve output quality by sampling multiple generations, but their effectiveness can be limited by randomly selecting where to regenerate. On MATH500 with Qwen2.5-Math-7B, we find that incorrect responses have substantially higher mean token entropy than correct responses, with an average within-question relative increase of approximately 112%, suggesting that entropy can signal reasoning errors. Motivated by this finding, we introduce REWIND, a training-free controller that uses entropy dynamics to propose targeted suffix regenerations. Across three model families and five benchmarks, REWIND outperforms all baselines, with gains of 0.51-10.00 percentage points over the strongest baseline. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of targeted, uncertainty-guided trajectory repair across models and tasks. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/rewind-D310.
0
cs.AIcs.CL Rishitosh Kumar Singh, Amir Saeidi, Shamanthak Hegde et al. · Oct 14, 2026

Existing agent benchmarks generally assume cooperative, emotionally stable users, overlooking a major source of real-world failure. This paper introduces τ-Emotion-Bench, a ten-domain benchmark that evaluates tool-calling agents under controlled emotion-conditioned user interactions, together with Tracer, a pipeline that collects training trajectories through an interaction-aware harness where dissatisfied users can terminate inefficient exchanges. It matters because it reveals large reliability gaps in frontier models and shows that small models can be trained to substantially improve interaction consistency with far less data than prior methods.

In long-horizon tool-calling tasks, LLM agents can fail not only because of tool-use errors, but also because of ineffective interaction with users. Yet existing benchmarks largely assume cooperative and behaviorally stable users, leaving the effect of emotional variation on agent reliability underexplored. We introduce $\tau$-Emotion-Bench, a ten-domain benchmark for evaluating tool-calling agents under controlled emotion-conditioned user interactions while preserving the underlying task objective. To scale both benchmark construction and agent training, we introduce Tracer, a scalable agentic data-generation pipeline that constructs grounded, policy-valid tasks and collects trajectories through an interactive agent--user--environment harness. By allowing dissatisfied users to terminate inefficient interactions, the harness provides an interaction-aware signal that filters trajectories with excessive user dependence and favors effective tool use. Experiments with two user simulators show that frontier agents remain unreliable, with substantial gaps between average task success and consistent task completion. Tracer-generated supervision consistently improves Qwen3 models across scales, generalizes to unseen domains, and transfers to $\tau$-Bench and $\tau$-Trait. Behavioral analyses further show that higher task success is associated with a better balance between tool execution and necessary user follow-up. Overall, $\tau$-Emotion-Bench and Tracer provide a scalable framework for evaluating agent reliability under diverse user behaviors and improving tool-calling agents through interaction-aware supervision.
0
cs.AI Shuai Li, Shengyuan Liu, Fan Qi et al. · Oct 14, 2026

PFedMA tackles reliable multi-round collaboration in Federated Multi-Agent Systems by jointly adapting agent selection and heterogeneous privacy rules as reasoning unfolds. Its core idea is a closed-loop orchestration that feeds response reliability and capability signals back into an RL-trained router, while a bidirectional local-global mechanism co-evolves privacy rules without overriding personalized constraints. This matters because existing approaches either select agents without historical accountability or enforce static privacy rules that cannot adapt to changing information needs across rounds, leading to error propagation and rigid privacy-utility trade-offs.

Federated Multi-Agent Systems (FedMAS) offer a promising paradigm for collaborative reasoning among LLM-based agents while keeping raw client data decentralized. However, reliable multi-round collaboration remains challenging. Agent selection must take into consideration evolving task requirements and the agent's historical reliability, while privacy rules must adapt to changing collaboration contexts and meet the client's personalized needs. To address these challenges, we propose PFedMA, a federated multi-agent framework for feedback driven multi-round collaboration under heterogeneous privacy requirements. Across rounds, PFedMA maintains historical capability and reliability states to guide agent selection, evaluates task responses before aggregation, and refines subsequent queries according to accumulated collaboration feedback. PFedMA enables bidirectional local to global and global to local private rule evolution across heterogeneous clients. Clients generalize locally updated privacy rules and selectively incorporate globally maintained rules, thereby facilitating cross-client privacy rule evolution while preserving personalized constraints. Extensive experiments across reasoning, privacy sensitive, and adversarial settings show that PFedMA improves task performance, reduces measured privacy leakage, and improves system robustness.
0
cs.LGcs.AI Aditya Radhakrishnan, Maxwell A. Xu, Wanting Mao et al. · Oct 14, 2026

TEX-MEX attacks the central challenge in time-series contrastive learning: how to define similarity when semantic-preserving augmentations are scarce or unreliable. It unifies structural and temporal similarity by letting the encoder grade windows by cosine similarity, then pulling an anchor toward the time-shifted versions of similar batch windows and pushing it away from those of dissimilar ones. The result is a graded, efficient objective that learns what typically accompanies a physiological pattern in time, and it powers a 560K-parameter PPG foundation model that beats architectures roughly 50× larger.

Contrastive learning for time series depends on deciding which pairs of inputs should be treated as similar and dissimilar. Because few augmentations reliably preserve meaning in time series, prior methods have relied on two disjoint notions of similarity between windows: structural similarity, which relates windows with similar morphology, and temporal similarity, which relates windows that occur close together in time. We introduce TEX-MEX, to our knowledge the first approach to unify the two into a single relationship. Given a random batch of windows drawn across the dataset, TEX-MEX uses the encoder to identify which windows are structurally similar or dissimilar to each other. It then pulls each window toward the temporally shifted versions of similar windows and pushes it away from those of dissimilar ones, learning what typically accompanies similar windows in time. Across PPG, EEG, ECG, accelerometry, and continuous glucose monitoring, TEX-MEX broadly achieves state-of-the-art performance against contrastive, reconstructive, JEPA-based, and modality-specific approaches, establishing it as a strong general SSL objective. We further train a 560K-parameter PPG foundation model that achieves state-of-the-art performance across a broad range of downstream benchmarks while being roughly 50x smaller than the next-best unimodally pretrained PPG foundation model in our evaluation. We will release this foundation model open-source and open-weight to the community to support future work and practical applications.
0
cs.LGcs.AI Armaan Sandhu, Abhijeet Sinha, Dianbo Liu · Oct 14, 2026

Standard expected-reward RL suffers from mode collapse, concentrating probability on a few outcomes even when tasks require many distinct, high-quality solutions. MIPS tackles this by estimating marginal outcome probabilities through a learned trajectory-conditional model, avoiding frequency-based estimation that breaks down when the outcome space is much larger than the rollout group. Using the identity $P_\theta(o) = P_\theta(\tau) / P_\theta(\tau|o)$, it scales rewards by inverse estimated probabilities within a standard GRPO update. On enumerable Hypergrids, molecular synthesis, and phylogenetic inference, MIPS maintains reward-aligned diversity where group-count IPS collapses.

Expected-reward maximization in reinforcement learning concentrates probability mass on a few outcomes, even in tasks that require many distinct, high-quality solutions, a failure known as mode collapse. Inverse Probability Scaling (IPS) counters this in group-based policy gradients such as GRPO by dividing each reward by the outcome's probability, estimated from its frequency within the sampled group. When the outcome space is large relative to the group, outcomes rarely repeat and these estimates become uninformative. Since an outcome can be constructed along many trajectories, its probability is a sum over all of them, and computing it directly is intractable. We propose Marginal IPS (MIPS), which performs marginal evaluation by combining the sampled trajectory with a learned model of the trajectories that lead to each outcome. On Hypergrids, where the exact sampling distribution is computable, MIPS stays near the reward-distribution target as the outcome space grows relative to the rollout group, while frequency-based IPS degrades. In molecular synthesis and phylogenetic inference, MIPS sustains diverse, high-quality sampling where GRPO and frequency-based IPS collapse, showing that MIPS serves as a reliable solution to mode collapse in RL.
0
cs.AIcs.IRcs.MA Tianzhu Hu, Hang Yu, Zeyuan Zhao et al. · Oct 14, 2026

Advertising delivery still relies heavily on manual coordination across budgeting, bidding, and diagnosis, limiting scale and performance. AdCoEvo automates this pipeline by assigning Planner, Optimizer, and Inspector roles to an 8B-parameter language model and updating their LoRA adapters in rotation using settled business feedback, so the agents mutually adapt during continuous simulated delivery. The authors report gains of roughly 14% in advertiser value and 7% lower cost per acquisition over rule-based baselines in the AuctionNet simulator.

Digital advertising is an important means for platforms to reach potential users and drive business growth. Advertising delivery is the core link between marketing objectives and actual returns. Existing methods have achieved partial automation in individual tasks such as bidding and budget allocation, but they still rely on human operators for overall coordination, making it difficult to support large-scale operations. They also often fail to achieve optimal performance, and individual experience remains difficult to turn into reusable operational capabilities. In addition, as advertising markets change, advertising delivery systems need timely strategy updates to remain effective in dynamic markets. To automate the entire advertising operations process and improve adaptability to market changes, we propose AdCoEvo, a co-evolving multi-agent advertising delivery system. Specifically, the system connects delivery decisions across different timescales and operational granularities through role specialization. Diagnostic results guide account planning and strategy adjustment in the next period. The multi-agent system updates its model parameters based on actual delivery outcomes and continually improves delivery strategies through mutual feedback among planning, adjustment, and diagnosis, thereby achieving co-evolution. Experiments show that, relative to the rule-based operational baseline (Rule), AdCoEvo increases advertiser value by 14.02% while reducing cost per acquisition by 7.07%. Compared with a multi-agent system with fixed parameters, AdCoEvo increases advertiser value by 3.96% and reduces cost per acquisition by 1.24%, indicating that co-evolution can yield greater delivery returns.
0
cs.ROcs.AI Yiquan Li, Aidan Bradshaw, Chenfeng Gao et al. · Oct 14, 2026

Wrist-worn IMUs power everything from gesture recognition to clinical motor assessment, yet most prior benchmarks evaluate each task in isolation, leaving unclear whether a single pretrained representation can serve all of them. This paper introduces IMU-Bench, a unified evaluation of ten tasks spanning kinematic estimation, semantic retrieval, activity recognition and Parkinson's assessment, and proposes InrtlWrist, a masked autoencoder pretrained on recorded and simulated wrist motion. The core finding is that pretraining yields broadly useful features—leading on nine of ten frozen-probe tasks—but that supervision from one downstream task rarely helps unrelated ones, distinguishing universal representation quality from task compatibility.

Wrist-worn inertial measurement units (IMUs) provide a common sensing modality for tasks ranging from activity and gesture recognition to pose estimation, inertial odometry and clinical motor assessment. Existing wearable benchmarks evaluate performance across multiple tasks, but leave open how supervision for one task affects transfer to others and whether these tasks benefit from a shared representation. We present IMU-Bench, a benchmark of ten tasks from eight datasets for studying IMU multi-task performance and cross-task transfer. We compare six self-supervised methods pretrained on unlabeled recorded and simulated wrist motion, evaluating classification, pose and velocity estimation, and IMU-language retrieval. We find that our masked autoencoder, InrtlWrist, achieves the best or joint-best frozen-probe performance on nine of ten tasks, and fine-tuning improves on training from scratch on nine of ten tasks, including full-body pose, odometry and retrieval. Across transfer and joint-training experiments, supervision that benefits one target can reduce performance on others, with supervised sources transferring within kinematic estimation while, under frozen probing, none approaches the pretrained encoder on language retrieval, and joint-training gains that come at a cost to the paired task. These findings distinguish broad downstream usefulness from complementary task supervision. Code, task cards and a leaderboard are publicly available.