Your paper timeline
Scroll AI takes the way you would scroll a great paper aggregator: quick signal first, deeper critique when something earns your attention, and challenges when a claim feels off.
698 papers in cs.AI
Trending mixes fresh papers with community signal.
0
cs.AIcs.LG Hanwei Fan, Yanqiao Wang, Yiqi Zhu et al. · Oct 14, 2026

Scientific taste varies across researchers, but learning individual preferences is hard when feedback is scarce and retrospective evidence only arrives after research unfolds. This paper proposes Privileged Hindsight Distillation (PHD), which trains a proposal-only student using later-emerging evidence to improve criterion assessment and population taste priors, then adapts the model to individuals with as few as 15 pairwise comparisons. The work matters because scaling research ideation requires filtering directions without collapsing diverse personal judgments into a single community consensus.

Scientific taste shapes which research directions researchers pursue, and it varies across individuals. Existing work evaluates research directions along multiple evaluation criteria or models scientific taste using community feedback signals such as citations and reviews, but neither directly captures how individuals translate assessments under the same criteria into different preferences. We model scientific taste as a researcher-specific mapping from criterion-level assessments in a shared, evidence-grounded evaluation space with proposal-visible evidence, to relative preferences. A population-level mapping learned from retrospective supervision provides a cold start when individual feedback is scarce. We introduce Privileged Hindsight Distillation (PHD), which uses later-emerging scientific evidence during training to improve proposal-time criterion assessment and the population mapping, while exposing only proposal-visible information at inference. We evaluate our approach primarily in quantum research, where structured public reviews are largely unavailable, and use pairwise proposal comparison as a direct interface for observing individual taste. With only 15 comparisons per researcher, our method captures sharply different tastes, including opposing preferences over the same research-direction pairs when they trade off across evaluation criteria. In an interactive study, personalized rankings also surface proposals associated with greater subsequent user engagement, connecting learned taste to downstream research exploration.
0
cs.ROcs.AIcs.MA Sajad Marvi, Julian Schmidt, Alessandro Canevaro et al. · Oct 14, 2026

The paper tackles robust multi-agent driving policies that generalize beyond their training domain. Its core idea is UncArms, a self-play scheme where probing agents are rewarded for increasing neighbors' epistemic uncertainty ($\Delta \mathrm{Unc}$), automatically generating a hard-case curriculum without hand-crafted scenarios. This matters because prior conditioned diversity methods impose a "diversity tax" on driving performance, and this work is the first to show a conditioned policy surpassing a strong unconditional self-play baseline.

Learning robust driving policies that generalize beyond their training domain remains a central challenge in motion planning. We propose an uncertainty-driven self-play scheme, in which half of the agents are rewarded for increasing their neighbors' epistemic uncertainty, while the other half learn to drive safely as the exploring agents continuously seek out their weaknesses. Epistemic uncertainty indicates where the policy is least confident and serves as an automatic proxy for scenario difficulty. Exploring agents use this signal to seek out hard cases, generating a challenging curriculum without manual scenario design. The resulting policy outperforms standard self-play, achieving best-in-class zero-shot transfer to nuplan Val14 (99.12% vs. 97.97%) and Argoverse 2 (82.39% vs. 78.03%) without fine-tuning, while also improving performance over standard self-play on Waymo. Our diversity-driven approach achieves 85% higher LSTM hidden-state coverage than the baseline, indicating a much richer set of behaviors. Further analysis shows that epistemic uncertainty serves as a calibrated difficulty detector, with highest-uncertain agents exhibiting 14.8 times the combined failure rate across collision, off-road, and DNF, of lowest-uncertain agents, enabling automatic prioritization of challenging scenarios without ground-truth labels.
0
cs.AI Tianxiang Gao, Yahan Li, Chenlu Guo et al. · Oct 14, 2026

Large language models often satisfy formatting requirements by chance rather than genuine correction, and standard pass rates cannot tell the difference. ReFormBench addresses this by using each model's own unconstrained response as a behavioral baseline, then tracking whether feature-and-mode targets are corrected across instruction variants. It introduces TCPR for complete compliance and EMCR for stable correction, showing that the two metrics yield different rankings across ten models.

Reliable use of large language models requires responses to satisfy formatting requirements across changing instructions. Standard compliance scores do not distinguish preserving a model's observed format from correcting it, or reveal whether that correction holds across variants. We introduce ReFormBench, a benchmark that uses each model's unconstrained response to the same question as its formatting baseline. It links targets by feature and require/forbid mode, evaluating their instantiated requirements across variants. ReFormBench comprises 5,000 difficulty-screened three-constraint test instances derived from 910 source questions and covering 66 formatting features. TCPR measures complete instruction compliance, while EMCR measures individual and joint correction of targets opposed to the annotated baseline state. Across ten models, EMCR ranges from 34.04% to 64.72%, and the highest three-target correction estimate is 50.02%. Compliance and correction scores yield different model rankings and task-level profiles. A prompting experiment on Qwen3.5-9B improves both metrics, and the catalog covers over 95% of extracted instances on four additional models. ReFormBench makes response-conditioned correction across instruction variants a measurable dimension of format following. The code and data are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/ReFormBench/.
0
cs.ROcs.AI Yuhang Hu, Junlin Lyu, Yuan Fang et al. · Oct 14, 2026

The paper tackles realistic gaze generation for a humanoid robot, separating the semantic choice of where to look from the physical motion of neck, eyes, and eyelids. Its Realistic Gaze Transformer (RGT) is a Transformer-VAE trained on retargeted human recordings and fine-tuned autoregressively to handle closed-loop rollout. Combined with an asynchronous vision-language model for target selection, the framework aims to make robot gaze more lifelike in real time. The authors benchmark kinematic fidelity but explicitly acknowledge that perceived naturalness and full pipeline accuracy are still open questions.

Gaze coordinates attention in human interaction through coupled eye, head, and eyelid motion. A humanoid robot must choose where to look while generating a suitable movement toward that target; fixed tracking rules alone do not model the temporal structure of human gaze. We separate these tasks with an asynchronous vision-language model that selects a scene referent, a reactive perception module that maintains fixation, and a Realistic Gaze Transformer (RGT) that generates target-conditioned motion. RGT is a Transformer-VAE trained on markerless human recordings retargeted to the robot's 11-DoF joint space: self-supervised pretraining encodes recent full-head history, and autoregressive fine-tuning exposes the model to its own predictions during rollout. At inference, a four-dimensional binocular-eye trajectory conditions coordinated neck and eye motion; an auxiliary blink predictor triggers eyelid templates during playback. On a two-second benchmark in which all controllers receive the same ground-truth target, RGT-Base obtains the lowest reported overall seven-joint MSE, and physical demonstrations show the integrated targeting and control pipeline. The evidence establishes robot-space kinematic fidelity and real-time RGT inference; perceived naturalness and open-vocabulary target-selection accuracy remain questions for controlled evaluation.
0
cs.AI Jingyuan Li, Yujie Liu, Yijie Dai et al. · Oct 14, 2026

Laboratory experiments require adaptive, evidence-based decisions beyond rote protocol execution. LabOPBench introduces a 756-question multimodal benchmark in organic synthesis and materials science where each item pairs real laboratory evidence with procedural context and an open-ended judgment scored by expert-defined, question-specific rubrics. Evaluating eight frontier multimodal models reveals a sharp capability gap: even the best model reaches only 45.8%, below PhD-level human performance, with dominant failure modes in misreading evidence and contradicting it with proposed actions.

Laboratory experiments involve more than following predefined protocols; they require adaptive decision-making as the experimental state changes. Existing scientific benchmarks rarely assess such evidence-based decisions in laboratory settings. Here we present LabOPBench, a multimodal benchmark of 756 expert-authored, independently reviewed questions in organic synthesis and materials science. Each item pairs laboratory evidence with procedural context and an open-ended judgment, evaluated using a question-specific scoring rubric. Eight multimodal models obtain overall normalized scores of 28.8-45.8%, leaving substantial room for improvement. On a controlled 100-question subset, the strongest models outperform undergraduate participants on average but remain below the average performance of PhD participants. Expert analysis of responses from the three leading models identifies Evidence Misreading and Evidence-Decision Conflict as the dominant error patterns. These results reveal that current models still struggle to turn multimodal perception into reliable laboratory decision-making.
0
cs.CLcs.AI Ziyang Ling, Shuyu Lu, Ziyi Chen · Oct 14, 2026

Multimorbid prescribing is a high-stakes coordination problem: patients with multiple chronic conditions receive fragmented, single-disease treatment plans that frequently trigger adverse drug events. PRISMATIC addresses this by treating prescription generation as a multi-agent synthesis task rather than monolithic text generation. The system deploys six specialized agents—ranging from information extraction to safety and rationality critics—on a shared blackboard, coordinated by an inner iterative-refinement loop (DFPC) and an outer long-term weight-adaptation loop (DSWA). The work matters because it reframes clinical AI safety as an explicit multi-objective coordination problem, moving beyond end-to-end LLM output toward modular, auditable reasoning.

Medical prescribing errors for multimorbid patients, who require complex drug regimens, are a major patient safety concern. These errors often stem from fragmented decision-making across medical specialties, a critical coordination failure that leads to adverse drug events and rehospitalizations. To address this coordination challenge, we introduce PRISMATIC, a multi-agent architecture where specialized agents, each representing a workflow role, collaboratively generate and refine treatment plans. Operating on a blackboard architecture, the system first structures patient information from clinical notes, then iteratively develops safe, rational, and interpretable drug regimens. The agents' collaboration is governed by two novel adaptive coordination mechanisms: (1) Dynamic Self-Updating Weight Adjustment (DSWA), a long-term mechanism that adjusts the influence weights of agents based on historical case outcomes, enabling the system to adapt and trust more reliable specialists over time. (2) Discrepancy Feedback Precise Calibration (DFPC), a short-term mechanism where agents provide iterative feedback to resolve disagreements and eliminate prescription conflicts for the current patient. Experiments on patient records from the MIMIC-IV database show that PRISMATIC significantly reduces drug conflicts, improves prescription coverage, and enhances treatment consistency compared to strong LLM baselines. Our work demonstrates that structuring clinical co-treatment as a multi-agent coordination problem offers a promising path toward safer and more coherent multidisease management.
0
cs.GTcs.AIcs.MA Yasushi Kawase, Bodhayan Roy, Mohammad Azharuddin Sanpui · Oct 14, 2026

Cake cutting asks how to divide a resource so that every agent values their own share at least as much as any other's, but when each agent must receive a single connected piece the computational complexity has been stubbornly open. This paper resolves the question by proving that computing an $\varepsilon$-envy-free contiguous allocation is PPAD-complete for normalized rational piecewise-constant additive valuations, even when densities take only two values and have at most six breakpoints. It also settles that finding contiguous EF$c$ allocations of indivisible goods on a path is PPAD-complete for any fixed $c\ge1$, using a novel pricing gadget that forces nearly equal prices regardless of how pieces are permuted among agents.

We prove that computing a complete contiguous $\varepsilon$-envy-free cake allocation is PPAD-complete for normalized rational piecewise-constant additive valuations. The hardness holds even when $\varepsilon$ is given in unary, and even when every density takes only two values, which are the same for all agents, and is piecewise constant with at most six breakpoints. As a consequence, computing an exact contiguous envy-free allocation is also PPAD-complete, and the hardness holds under the same restrictions on the densities. Our key ingredient is to assign prices to the pieces so that, in every approximately envy-free allocation, all prices are nearly equal, regardless of how the pieces are assigned to the agents. We further show that, for every fixed integer $c\ge1$, computing a contiguous EF$c$ allocation of indivisible goods on a path is PPAD-complete for additive valuations, and the hardness holds even for binary valuations in which each good is valued by exactly one agent and all agents value the same number of goods.
0
cs.CLcs.AI Minghan Li, Guodong Zhou · Oct 14, 2026

The paper tackles the token inefficiency of visible reasoning traces in Chinese LLMs, which are typically generated in modern vernacular Chinese. It proposes Wenyan Thinking, a method that rewrites intermediate reasoning into Classical Chinese (wenyanwen) to produce more compact traces while keeping final answers short and benchmark-compatible. The work matters because it treats linguistic register itself as a controllable compression axis for reasoning, offering a practical way to improve accuracy under tight generation budgets without architectural changes.

Visible reasoning traces of Chinese reasoning-oriented LLMs are typically written in modern vernacular Chinese, which may be verbose under limited decoding budgets. We ask whether the linguistic register of reasoning can be used to improve efficiency. We propose Wenyan Thinking, which emits intermediate reasoning in Classical Chinese (wenyanwen) while retaining a short direct-answer output. Starting from modern-Chinese reasoning traces, we rewrite only the reasoning field into wenyan and fine-tune Qwen3-4B-Thinking-2507 on the rewritten supervision. To distinguish register shift from generic compression, we construct a compact modern-Chinese control using the same source data, teacher family, base model, and SFT recipe. Across budget-sensitive evaluations on MMLU-ProX-Lite-ZH, CEVAL, and AGIEval-CN, Wenyan Thinking substantially reduces reasoning length and missing-answer rates under constrained decoding. Compact rewriting explains much of the efficiency gain, while wenyan consistently outperforms the compact modern-Chinese control on the primary benchmark and remains competitive across the additional benchmarks. These results identify linguistic register as a practical design axis for efficient visible reasoning in Chinese LLMs.
0
cs.AI Ilaria Imperatrice, Taisia Kameneva, Adam Eric Greenberg et al. · Oct 14, 2026

Do fast, structured AI decision models exhibit the same cognitive and social biases that plague human intuitive judgment? This study subjects Jev—a commercial "System One" model that returns probabilities over fixed choices rather than generating text—to 41,500 trials across cognitive reflection, classical bias paradigms, and a demographic pricing task. The core contribution is showing that pristine accuracy on famous benchmark items can collapse under minor rewordings or answer-order changes, and that probability scores often shift even when the top choice does not, which matters deeply when those probabilities drive downstream automation.

Do AI models designed for fast, structured decisions exhibit the cognitive and social biases observed in human judgment? We evaluate Jev, a model described as a System One decision-maker, using 41,500 responses across cognitive reflection tasks, five classical cognitive-bias paradigms, and a pricing experiment testing ethnic and gender bias. At the level of selected answers, the results are largely encouraging. We confirm previous findings that Jev performs extremely well on cognitive reflection problems. We also observe that it generally avoids the characteristic choice patterns associated with several well-documented human biases, and exhibits only small differences among demographic groups in the tested pricing scenario. However, this apparent robustness conceals important vulnerabilities. Its judgments are sensitive to irrelevant numerical information and the ordering of response options. Moreover, several cognitive-bias manipulations substantially affect returned probabilities even when selected answers remain unchanged. Most strikingly, Jev answers a well-known probability problem correctly in every response but violates the same underlying probability rule in every response to an adapted version. We investigate this discrepancy using 15,000 additional responses across 30 conjunction tasks. Jev violates the rule in 54\% of responses, with accuracy varying dramatically across formulations and answer orders. These findings suggest that evaluating decision models solely on familiar benchmarks and selected answers may substantially overstate their reliability in practical applications. They also identify vulnerabilities for developers to address and practical considerations for users integrating such models into automated decision-making systems.
0
cs.LGcs.AIq-bio.QM Alberto Mart\'inez, Natalia Flechas Manrique, Lloren\c{c} Espinosa-Portal\'es et al. · Oct 14, 2026

ProtModernBERT tackles the high cost of training protein language models by porting modern NLP encoder improvements—RoPE, FlashAttention, GeGLU, and bias-free layers—into a BERT-style protein model. The authors pre-train on the UR100P corpus and show that a 140M-parameter model can match ProtBert and Amplify-120M on structural benchmarks while using roughly one-tenth the pre-training FLOPs of ProtBert. The work matters because it tests whether architectural modernization alone can lower the barrier to custom protein LMs for resource-constrained labs, and it uses random-initialization baselines to separate inductive biases from transfer-learned features.

Large protein language models provide a powerful framework for learning sequence-function relationships and guiding experimental design. However, architectural improvements are underexplored, especially in low-compute regimes of relevance for resource-constrained research laboratories. We show that the training cost for encoder-only transformer architectures can be reduced by leveraging modern architectural refinements, offering an encouraging performance / compute-efficiency trade-off. We introduce ProtModernBERT, a modernized BERT-style model pre-trained on amino acid sequences, and compare it with ProtBert, Amplify, and ESM2 across a set of supervised structural tasks -encompassing secondary structure prediction, disorder prediction, and subcellular localization- and ProteinGym's zero-shot functional benchmark. We find that ProtModernBERT matches or closely tracks the performance of Amplify-120M and ProtBert with up to 80-90\% reduction in pre-training FLOPs, and narrows the gap to ESM2 when controlling for pre-training. Our analysis using a cluster-based validation protocol for hyperparameter selection and randomly initialized models disentangles the contributions of architecture and data, showing that modern components provide stronger inductive biases that are more consequential than parameter count in low-compute regimes.
0
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL Aryan Das, Arnab Bhattacharya, Vinay Kumar Verma · Oct 14, 2026

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards suffers from coarse scalar supervision and moving-target instability in self-distillation. FSPO eliminates the persistent teacher model by storing sparse historical next-token distributions as fixed function-space targets, combining them with privileged disagreement correction and reliability-adaptive grounding. Across scientific reasoning and tool-use benchmarks, it achieves roughly 4% higher average accuracy than SDPO under a 5-hour budget while cutting peak memory from about 70 GB to 56 GB on Olmo3-7B-Instruct.

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) improves reasoning in language models, but scalar outcomes provide coarse supervision over response trajectories. Self-distillation offers denser token-level guidance by comparing an unassisted policy with a feedback-informed self-teacher, yet the teacher evolves with the student, creating unstable targets and motivating additional regularization. We introduce Function-Space Policy Optimization (FSPO), a single-policy framework that combines current privileged adaptation with function-space temporal consolidation. FSPO stores sparse historical next-token distributions as fixed temporal targets, providing temporal separation without maintaining a persistent teacher model. It further introduces privileged disagreement correction to explicitly suppress locally overvalued actions, reliability-adaptive grounding that strengthens reference supervision when self-generated evidence repeatedly fails, and quality and coverage-aware temporal memory that retains verified behaviors and improves privileged demonstrations. Across reasoning and tool-use benchmarks, FSPO achieves the highest average accuracy under a 5-hour training budget, improving over the strongest baseline by approximately 4% points on average while reducing peak memory from about 70 GB to 56 GB on Olmo3-7B-Instruct.
0
cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG Minseok Ko, Hyunseok Lee, Woomin Song et al. · Oct 14, 2026

As large language models proliferate, identifying which model family generated a given text must remain reliable even when the domain or model version changes at test time. This paper proposes ATLAS, a generative framework that learns source-conditioned text distributions through lightweight adapter tuning and attributes text by comparing clipped token-level likelihoods. A new benchmark, MAABench, demonstrates that this likelihood-based approach outperforms direct discriminative classifiers under distribution shifts, while also enabling identification of distillation teachers.

As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate text, their misuse has become a growing societal problem, with implications for academic misconduct, model distillation, and cyberattacks. For these reasons, Model Authorship Attribution (MAA), which identifies the source model of a given text, is important for promoting the responsible use of LLMs and improving AI safety. In practice, attribution systems must remain reliable beyond the distributions observed during training. They may encounter texts from unseen domains and writing settings, as well as generations from future versions of model families that were not available when the system was trained. However, existing MAA methods often exhibit substantial performance degradation under such distribution shifts. To address this challenge, we propose Authorship Tracing via Likelihood-based Attribution of Sources (ATLAS), which formulates MAA through source-conditioned text modeling rather than direct source prediction. ATLAS learns how text from each source family is generated and attributes a given text by comparing its likelihood under each learned source condition. We aggregate this likelihood evidence at the token level with clipping so that no single token dominates the decision. We further introduce MAABench, a broad MAA benchmark for evaluating practical OOD settings such as domain and version. Our experiments show that ATLAS consistently outperforms existing baselines across MAABench and OpenTuringBench. In particular, when both the generation domain and the model version change on MAABench, ATLAS achieves 74.27% accuracy, 9.00pp higher than the strongest baseline. Beyond MAA, ATLAS can also help identify distillation source models by measuring which source model a target LLM most closely resembles. Our extended experiments show that ATLAS recovers the known teacher of every distilled model we evaluate.
0
cs.CVcs.AI Shuofeng Sun, Wenzhao Zheng, Yunpeng Zhang et al. · Oct 14, 2026

SceneAE proposes a sparse 3D-anchored latent representation for scene reconstruction and camera-controllable generation. Instead of viewpoint-aligned video latents, each latent couples an explicit 3D point with an implicit feature, enabling queryable rendering from arbitrary cameras. A two-stage diffusion model decouples geometry generation from content synthesis, improving camera control and cutting computational cost roughly in half compared with dense-grid baselines.

Recent video world models have increasingly adopted 3D memory mechanisms to integrate historical observations into a lightweight and persistent scene representation. This naturally raises a complementary question: if 3D representations can serve as an effective mechanism for memorizing observed scenes, can they also be directly used as the latent space for reconstructing and generating scenes? Motivated by this idea, we represent a scene as a compact and unstructured 3D-anchored latent space (\textbf{SceneAE}). Each latent combines an explicit 3D position with an implicit content feature and is spatially grounded to describe its local scene region, forming a sparse latent point cloud. Unlike conventional video-VAE latents that describe how a scene appears from particular viewpoints, our representation directly describes the scene itself, making it naturally applicable to both reconstruction and generation. For reconstruction, once the scene has been generated, our persistent 3D representation can be projected and decoded into RGB-D observations by different target cameras, without the need to regenerate a video for each new camera trajectory. For generation, we leverage the geometry-content separation to first generate camera-controlled 3D geometry and then synthesize content conditioned on it, reducing camera-appearance entanglement and improving camera controllability. Experiments show that this 3D latent achieves superior generation quality, computational cost, and camera controllability.
0
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG Raavi Gupta, Ziqing Yang, Karli R. Hochstatter et al. · Oct 14, 2026

The paper tackles the months-long lag in confirming US overdose deaths by predicting suspected overdoses directly from death investigation reports available days after a fatality. Its core idea is an expert-guided pipeline that extracts verbatim evidence spans—feature-guided rationales—to support classification, comparing them against templated verbalizations and against joint self-rationalizing models. The best configuration improves over a deployed rule-based system by roughly 15% relative macro-F1 while preserving expert oversight, offering a plausible path to faster public-health surveillance.

Confirmation of overdose deaths in the United States is often delayed due to the complexities of certifying drug-involved deaths. Death investigation reports represent a rich but underutilized data source that could be used to predict whether a death is a suspected overdose (i.e., a death preliminarily identified as an overdose prior to the final cause and manner of death determination). We present an automated framework that classifies suspected overdoses from death investigation reports, while producing supporting explanations guided by expert knowledge. Through an expert-guided design process, we investigate 1) what type of explanations are best for model prediction performance, and 2) which architecture is better suited for this task: pipeline models that rationalize first and then predict, or self-rationalizing models that jointly predict and rationalize? Our experiments show that a pipeline model with explanations grounded in the input death investigation reports outperforms the other settings. Our best model also outperforms a rule-based system currently in deployment by 15%, while allowing expert interventions for final decisions.
0
cs.AIcs.LG Yan Xu, Dandan Song, Luan Zhang et al. · Oct 14, 2026

LLM-based agents can produce final reports that falsely claim task success even when their execution trajectories failed to follow required sources or procedures. This paper defines Agent Completion Unfaithfulness as a misalignment between what an agent actually did and what it ultimately reports, and proposes MCAIR, a runtime framework that uses step-level internal representations to train a lightweight linear probe for online risk detection and correction. Because users typically rely on final reports rather than inspecting full execution traces, detecting and mitigating such overstatement is critical for trustworthy autonomous agents.

Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in completing complex tasks through multi-step reasoning and tool interactions. However, recent studies have revealed that LLM-based agents can exhibit unfaithful behaviors, where their final reports fail to faithfully reflect their actual execution trajectories. Specifically, when agents fail to accomplish tasks through the intended sources or procedures, they may resort to alternative sources or strategies while failing to disclose such deviations, leading users to incorrectly believe that the tasks have been completed according to the original requirements. We refer to this specific form of agent unfaithfulness as Agent Completion Unfaithfulness. Detecting and mitigating agent completion unfaithfulness is critical yet remains largely unexplored. In this work, we propose MCAIR, a runtime monitoring and correction framework that leverages internal representations of LLM-based agents. MCAIR uses multi-step internal representations as inputs to train a risk-aware probe, enabling online detection of potential completion unfaithfulness during execution. Furthermore, MCAIR introduces a risk-guided correction loop that prompts agents to review their execution history and mitigate potential inconsistencies between their execution trajectories and final reports. Additionally, we construct ACUD, a dataset for Agent Completion Unfaithfulness detection that provides step-level execution traces, step-level internal representations, and consistency annotations for training and evaluating runtime detection probes. Experiments demonstrate that MCAIR outperforms LLM-as-a-judge baselines, generalizes across prompts and tasks, and effectively reduces agent completion unfaithfulness.
0
cs.MAcs.AI Weihao Li, Jun Bai, Shijie Chen et al. · Oct 14, 2026

XferAgent tackles the problem of sharing reusable task experience across heterogeneous LLM agents. Instead of trapping effective strategies inside individual memories, it organizes local and shared experience graphs and reconciles cross-agent contributions with a similarity-margin merge rule that avoids unreliable unions. For each new task, it routes a connected, task-relevant subgraph and integrates it with local experience so agents benefit from collective exploration without sacrificing agent-specific context.

Large language model (LLM) agents can reuse experience from prior task executions to improve performance on subsequent tasks. Although existing methods enable cross-agent experience sharing, differences in agents' execution histories and task requirements make shared experiences difficult to reuse effectively. We propose XferAgent, a framework for cross-agent experience transfer that organizes reusable experience in local and shared experience graphs. XferAgent reconciles compatible contributions from heterogeneous agents while avoiding unreliable merges. For each new task, it selects shared experiences and integrates them with the target agent's local experience to support task execution. Experiments across diverse task domains show improvements over representative memory-based methods and effective experience transfer between heterogeneous agent frameworks. Cumulative task success also increases over successive task passes as agents update and reuse their experiences.
0
cs.LGcs.AI Minwoo Yu, Young-guk Ha · Oct 14, 2026

Temporal graph data come in different formats, but it is unclear whether representation boundaries limit how learned predictive structure can be reused. This paper proposes that Relational Dynamics—the predictive regularities in relational histories—can be transferred across continuous-time dynamic graphs and temporal knowledge graphs while keeping their input and prediction layers separate. The core idea is to train a shared history encoder on one representation, freeze it, and drop it beneath a different representation’s interface, then use controlled source-history reorganizations to identify which organizational aspects actually drive reuse. If the empirical claims hold up, the work implies that temporal graph foundation models need not be siloed by representation.

Temporal graph data are recorded in different representations, but whether these differences also determine the scope of learned knowledge reuse remains unclear. This study investigates whether predictive structure learned from relational histories can be reused between continuous-time dynamic graphs (CTDGs) and temporal knowledge graphs (TKGs). Bidirectional reuse emerges while retaining distinct input and prediction interfaces and independent vocabularies, and sources with the same representation are not always more useful. Controlled reorganizations of source histories show that the organization contributing to reuse varies across source-target conditions. We show that learned aspects of Relational Dynamics, the predictive structure present in relational histories, can be reused across conventional representation boundaries. Independently pretrained TKG and CTDG learners can also be fused at the score level to improve prediction on a third dataset without entity or relation-semantic alignment. Two proofs of concept in recommendation and security detection illustrate that external temporal sources without direct alignment can also become useful pretraining resources.
0
cs.AIcs.SYeess.SY Mirco Giacobbe, Thomas A. Henzinger, Konstantin Kueffner et al. · Oct 14, 2026

Supermartingale certificates guarantee temporal properties of stochastic dynamical systems, but their validity depends on a design-time model that may not match the black-box deployment environment. This paper introduces a runtime monitoring framework that observes a single live trajectory and uses betting-based sequential testing to raise an alarm when statistical evidence suggests the certificate has been violated. By applying Ville’s inequality, the method provides a user-specified bound on the probability of ever raising a false alarm, closing the sim-to-real gap for probabilistic certificates.

Supermartingale certificates formally guarantee temporal properties of discrete and continuous-time stochastic dynamical systems. However, these guarantees rely on a mathematical model of the world, leaving a sim-to-real gap that can invalidate them for the deployed system. We formulate the runtime monitoring problem for supermartingale certificates, in which a monitor observes a single system trajectory and raises an alarm when there is sufficient statistical evidence that the supermartingale certificate has been violated during execution. We present an algorithm to automatically construct a monitor using betting-based sequential tests that bound the probability of ever raising a false alarm at a user-specified level. Within this betting framework, we formulate strategies that allow the monitor to exploit spatial regularity to improve detection power while preserving this statistical guarantee. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach on supermartingale certificate benchmarks from the literature.
0
cs.AI Hui Zhang, Yujia Zeng, Yuhao Xin · Oct 14, 2026

Clinical LLMs must import external medical knowledge that can be poisoned, outdated, or hallucinated, yet the gravest risk is regression—turning a correct answer into an incorrect one. This paper introduces Med-TrustRouter, a lightweight per-instance router that selects among five knowledge-use actions using only leakage-free runtime signals, preserving the base answer unless another action is confidently better. On a new benchmark with seven attack families and paired clean controls, it raises the worst-case accuracy floor to 69.2%, well above any fixed-strategy competitor.

Clinical reasoning LLMs need external medical knowledge, but retrieved evidence and reasoning chains can be outdated, poisoned, or hallucinated. Harmful knowledge can cause regression: changing a correct answer into an incorrect one. We construct a medical knowledge-poisoning benchmark covering retrieved evidence and reasoning chains, with seven attack families filtered by a three-judge "subtle-but-wrong" vote and paired clean exams that separate poisoning effects from question difficulty. No fixed knowledge-use strategy is robust across these settings: strong RAG methods trade robustness to poisoned evidence against accuracy when evidence is useful. We formulate knowledge use as per-instance routing and introduce Med-TrustRouter, a lightweight controller that keeps the solver frozen. From leakage-free runtime signals, it estimates each action's expected correctness gain and uncertainty, preserving the base answer unless another action is confidently better. Across seven medical reasoning settings, Med-TrustRouter achieves 78.9 macro and 69.2 worst-case accuracy, matching the strongest competitor on macro accuracy while substantially improving the worst-case floor. Its gains transfer across solvers and evidence judges, unlike a hand-coded router using the same signals. Similar performance across linear, tree, and neural action-value heads suggests that the benefit comes from routing rather than estimator complexity. These results support learning when to trust external knowledge for robust clinical reasoning.
0
cs.AI Tiantian Peng, Guannan Lv, Hongyang Li et al. · Oct 14, 2026

On-policy distillation (OPD) trains a student on its own trajectories with reverse-KL, but reverse-KL gives weak gradients for teacher-supported tokens where the student assigns very low probability, causing teacher-mode under-coverage. This paper proposes Divergence-Routed OPD (DrOPD), which uses cross-sampling to show that teacher-student Jensen-Shannon divergence pinpoints behaviorally critical positions better than single-model entropy, then adds forward-KL selectively at the highest-JS positions while keeping reverse-KL everywhere. Across six math benchmarks and two student-teacher pairs, DrOPD reduces severe under-coverage by 37.9% and improves mean Avg@8 by up to 1.84 points, offering a principled token-level strategy for allocating distillation supervision.

On-policy distillation (OPD) transfers knowledge from a teacher model to a student along student-generated trajectories, typically by minimizing the reverse Kullback-Leibler (RKL) divergence. However, RKL can provide weak corrective signals for teacher-supported tokens to which the student assigns very low probability. This raises two questions: which positions are most consequential for the behavioral gap between the student and teacher, and what additional supervision is needed at these positions? Through cross-sampling, we find that divergence-based routing more effectively pinpoints positions contributing to the teacher-student performance gap than entropy-based routing. Further analysis reveals teacher-mode under-coverage at high Jensen-Shannon (JS) divergence positions, where standard OPD increases the large teacher-student probability gaps. Motivated by these findings, we propose Divergence-Routed On-Policy Distillation (DrOPD). DrOPD retains RKL supervision at all positions and selectively adds forward Kullback-Leibler (FKL) divergence supervision at positions with high JS divergence. Experiments across six math benchmarks show that DrOPD improves over standard OPD and entropy-based routing. DrOPD also reduces severe under-coverage cases by 37.9 percent relative to OPD, supporting targeted FKL as an effective complement to OPD.